On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:21:34AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Full report available at:
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-12-06.txt
> grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
Could we get rid of the limit
"Too many dependencies for wsdl4j, not all
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On 11/22/21 08:39, Jan K wrote:
Most seem to come because of dependency of truth. I have not been able
to take it due to lacking rights, so someone should take it for now and
can transfer it to me once I have needed access rights.
Jan
fas: copperi
I've taken truth for now since I
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 12:12:03PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Sérgio Basto said:
> > and why ipmitool was orphaned ? it was built successfully , its
> > maintain upstream ...
>
> It also has mulitple co-maintainers... hopefully somebody can step up?
Yeah, I use ipmitool all
Once upon a time, Sérgio Basto said:
> and why ipmitool was orphaned ? it was built successfully , its
> maintain upstream ...
It also has mulitple co-maintainers... hopefully somebody can step up?
--
Chris Adams
___
devel mailing list --
On 22. 11. 21 16:48, Sérgio Basto wrote:
1. ipmitool will be retired in 6 weeks
and why ipmitool was orphaned ? it was built successfully , its
maintain upstream ...
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ipmitool
says "Orphaned for: Lack of time"
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 03:48:46PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-11-22 at 14:44 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > 1. ipmitool will be retired in 6 weeks
>
> and why ipmitool was orphaned ? it was built successfully , its
> maintain upstream ...
Unclear - also unclear why
On Mon, 2021-11-22 at 14:44 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 22. 11. 21 14:11, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:12:28PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > Full report available at:
> > > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-11-22.txt
> > > grep it for your FAS
, 2021 2:12 PM
To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
; Development discussions related to
Fedora
Subject: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
On 22. 11. 21 15:11, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 03:00:04PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 22. 11. 21 14:56, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 02:44:16PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 22. 11. 21 14:11, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 03:00:04PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 22. 11. 21 14:56, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 02:44:16PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>On 22. 11. 21 14:11, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:12:28PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
On 22. 11. 21 14:56, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 02:44:16PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 22. 11. 21 14:11, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:12:28PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Full report available at:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 02:44:16PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 22. 11. 21 14:11, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:12:28PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>Full report available at:
> >>https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-11-22.txt
> >>grep it for your FAS
On 22. 11. 21 14:11, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:12:28PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Full report available at:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-11-22.txt
grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
A lot of virt and filesystem
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:12:28PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Full report available at:
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2021-11-22.txt
> grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
A lot of virt and filesystem packages are shown in the report, but I
think it
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On 11/8/21 22:52, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
reason:
On 11/8/21 22:52, Miro Hrončok wrote:
jacoco jvanek, kdaniel, lef, orphan 1 weeks ago
I'd like to take this package.
--
Regards,
Didik Supriadi (he/him)
https://getfedora.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 4:53 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> python-pylibmcabompard, orphan, pjp1 weeks
> ago
>
Taken.
--
Best regards / S pozdravem,
František Zatloukal
Quality Engineer
Red Hat
___
devel mailing list --
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 4:55 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
I've taken it, but I can let you work on the FTBFS if you like. Or I can.
Whichever. :)
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original
> SDL2_gfx ignatenkobrain, orphan 1 weeks ago
I'd like to pick this up, but I have next to zero experience working with
autotools,
so I'll defer adopting the package until I have a working fix for the FTBFS.
___
devel
On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 04:52:38PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
On Mon, 2021-11-08 at 16:52 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> platform orphan, sergiomb 4
> weeks ago
I took it because is needed by libcec , I was already maintainer of the
package
--
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel
Hi,
On 11/8/21 22:52, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
reason:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 3:44 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 12:41:59PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > ocaml-charinfo-width orphan 2 weeks
> > ago
> > ocaml-cmdlinerorphan 2 weeks
> > ago
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 12:41:59PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> ocaml-charinfo-width orphan 2 weeks ago
> ocaml-cmdlinerorphan 2 weeks ago
> ocaml-cudforphan 2
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, October 25th, 2021 at 5:41 AM, Miro Hrončok
wrote:
>
> speech-dispatcher orphan 2 weeks ago
Taken.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list --
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 6:43 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> ghc-HStringTemplate orphan 2 weeks
> ago
> ghc-filestore orphan 2 weeks
> ago
> ghc-hoauth2 orphan 2 weeks
>
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Le lundi 04 octobre 2021 à 14:36 +0200, Miro Hrončok a écrit :
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 18:16:17 +0200,
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
Am 20.09.21 um 13:31 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
0ad ignatenkobrain, orphan, pwalter 1
weeks ago
I would be interested in becoming a (co)maintainer for this, but would
need sponsorship.
I think I
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 17:44:07 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
So it looks like, one way or another the mozjs78 stuff will need to
get patched after the source gets extracted in the build step.
I found the reference to how to patch mozjs78 in 0ad. You need to
have your patch file drop off
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 16:06:24 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I thought of that. I tried some naive ways to do that without success.
I'm not sure if any extra python packages are needed. Probably not,
but if so it won't work since those will be for 3.10.
There doesn't seem to be a standard
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 23:03:12 +0200,
Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 21. 09. 21 19:19, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
If there is no Python version runtime dependency there, you could
temporaily use the python3.9 package to build the bundled mozjs78.
I thought of that. I tried some naive ways to do that
On 21. 09. 21 19:19, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 18:16:17 +0200,
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
Am 20.09.21 um 13:31 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
0ad ignatenkobrain, orphan, pwalter 1 weeks ago
I would be interested in becoming a (co)maintainer for
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 18:16:17 +0200,
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
Am 20.09.21 um 13:31 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
0ad ignatenkobrain, orphan, pwalter 1
weeks ago
I would be interested in becoming a (co)maintainer for this, but would
need sponsorship.
The main
On Mon, 2021-09-20 at 22:13 +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> Jonathan Schleifer kirjoitti 20.9.2021 klo 19.16:
> > Am 20.09.21 um 13:31 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
> >
> > > 0ad ignatenkobrain, orphan, pwalter
> > > 1
> > > weeks ago
> >
> > Also, how is the flatpak
Jonathan Schleifer kirjoitti 20.9.2021 klo 19.16:
Am 20.09.21 um 13:31 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
0ad ignatenkobrain, orphan, pwalter 1
weeks ago
Also, how is the flatpak package handled? I know how it works for RPM,
but flatpak's all new to me and I see there's
Am 20.09.21 um 13:31 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
0ad ignatenkobrain, orphan, pwalter 1
weeks ago
I would be interested in becoming a (co)maintainer for this, but would
need sponsorship.
Also, how is the flatpak package handled? I know how it works for RPM,
but
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
I was so focussed on work for the past year or so (including some work on
bugzilla.redhat.com ironically) I have severely neglected my Fedora role.
Last night I started reclaiming the packages still orphaned and I will be
updating them as needed.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 5:42 AM Miro Hrončok
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 7:07 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 8:05 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if we should retire the remaining eclipse packages from f35
>> before the final freeze, as well? The main "eclipse" package is
>> already gone, so most of them are
On 08. 09. 21 11:35, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 07/09/2021 à 11:51, Miro Hrončok a écrit :
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
php-EasyRdf orphan 1 weeks ago
Le 07/09/2021 à 11:51, Miro Hrončok a écrit :
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
for sure
php-EasyRdf orphan 1 weeks ago
php-Faker orphan 1
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 8:05 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
>
> (...)
>
> > Package (co)maintainers
> Status Change
> >
>
> >
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
(...)
> Package (co)maintainers Status
> Change
>
> cbi-plugins eclipse-sig, kdaniel, mbooth,
I'll take php-google-apiclient1, php-pear-OLE, and php-fedora-autoloader to
keep Moodle in Fedora, but if someone more involved in PHP wants them instead
or wants to be a co-maintainer, please let me know.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On 8/24/21 7:24 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 7:50 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
binA_H3nIaeSi.bin
Description: PGP/MIME version identification
encrypted.asc
Description: OpenPGP encrypted message
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
I have taken rust-ab_glyph_rasterizer and rust-owned_ttf_parser since i will
need them for a future package.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
Le lundi 19 juillet 2021 à 03:49, Miro Hrončok a écrit :
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 02:06:16PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> * The guile maintainers don't want guile to be a dependency of the
> core toolchain either.
It was pointed out to me off list that this statement isn't accurate -
I confused a toolchain maintainer with a guile maintainer.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 9:06 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>
> I hope a reasonable summary is:
>
> * The core toolchain maintainers don't want guile to be a requirement.
>
> * The guile maintainers don't want guile to be a dependency of the
> core toolchain either.
>
> * With a small
I hope a reasonable summary is:
* The core toolchain maintainers don't want guile to be a requirement.
* The guile maintainers don't want guile to be a dependency of the
core toolchain either.
* With a small adjustment, Makefiles which use guile can be changed
even if make itelf doesn't
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Wednesday, 7 July 2021 11.59.18 WEST Chuck Anderson wrote:
> I'm not listed as a (co)maintainer, so I'm not sure how I ended up on
> this list.
By a transitive dependency relation... :-)
Basically one of your packages depends on another package that depends on
guile22.
--
José
On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 06:59:18 -0400
Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 11:18:04AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > cra: guile22
>
> I'm not listed as a (co)maintainer, so I'm not sure how I ended up on
> this list.
because a package you maintain depends (even indirectly) on guile22,
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 11:18:04AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> cra: guile22
I'm not listed as a (co)maintainer, so I'm not sure how I ended up on
this list.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 6:08 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 11:18:04AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > guile22 mlichvar, orphan 1 weeks
> > ago
>
> There's a dependency chain going from guile22 -> gnutls-devel -> lots
> of
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 11:18:04AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> guile22 mlichvar, orphan 1 weeks ago
There's a dependency chain going from guile22 -> gnutls-devel -> lots
of virtualization packages.
This dependency provides gnutls bindings for guile
Hi,
On 7/7/21 11:18 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Thanks Mikolaj - Just saw your reply and have added you as an admin.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 2:54 PM Andrew Bauer
wrote:
>
> Looks like jakarta-mail affects quite a few packages. I have taken it.
You can transfer jakarta-mail package to me if you like. It's a
dependency of Ant which I'm maintainer of .
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
>
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Looks like jakarta-mail affects quite a few packages. I have taken it.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Monday, 07 June 2021 at 10:25, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
Hello, I took the plasma-pass package and I am already able to build from
source as well.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 11:28 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
> sure
>
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 4:29 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> (I've added a few opam devs to CC)
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:14:41PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > opam orphan 1 weeks
> > ago
>
> I didn't notice that opam had been
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:14 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> There is some tooling written by Jerry James to turn opam metadata
> into Fedora packages and with a bit more coordination and development
> this could be mostly automated. (Fedora package review gets in the
> way, but I think even most
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 03:48:09PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Eh, I though initially that OPAM is a new abbreviation of *O*rphaned
> *PA*ckages looking for new *M*aintainers
OCaml Package Manager :-)
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 07:51:48AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > (Fedora package review gets in the
> > way, but I think even most Fedora developers think Fedora package
> > review is the wrong approach.)
> >
>
> *I* certainly don't think that. I do think that the method of
> execution for package
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 5:15 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 09:43:07AM +0100, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> > On 19 May 2021, at 18:38, David Allsopp wrote:
> > >
> > > Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >> (I've added a few opam devs to CC)
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, May 18, 2021
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:14:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> There is some tooling written by Jerry James to turn opam metadata
> into Fedora packages and with a bit more coordination and development
> this could be mostly automated. (Fedora package review gets in the
> way, but I think
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 09:43:07AM +0100, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> On 19 May 2021, at 18:38, David Allsopp wrote:
> >
> > Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> (I've added a few opam devs to CC)
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:14:41PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>> opam
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 05:38:08PM +, David Allsopp wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > (I've added a few opam devs to CC)
> >
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:14:41PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > opam orphan 1
> > weeks ago
> >
> >
On Thursday, May 20, 2021 1:15:57 AM WEST Ian McInerney wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 9:56 PM Jerry James wrote:
> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:39 AM Michael J Gruber
> >
> > wrote:
> > > I'd say that packaging a texlive file in another package is wrong
> >
> > anyways, so I'd suggest 3) in
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 9:56 PM Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:39 AM Michael J Gruber
> wrote:
> > I'd say that packaging a texlive file in another package is wrong
> anyways, so I'd suggest 3) in any case, with the possibility that someone
> can still take up auctex, fix the
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:39 AM Michael J Gruber wrote:
> I'd say that packaging a texlive file in another package is wrong anyways, so
> I'd suggest 3) in any case, with the possibility that someone can still take
> up auctex, fix the emacs-lisp error and make auctex depend on texlive-preview
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:39 PM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> > spec
> > actually provides a "tex-preview" package that is just preview.sty and
> > is used by several packages to do tex rendering and preview:
> > $ repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires tex-preview
> > Last metadata
401 - 500 of 1047 matches
Mail list logo
