Re: [Fedora-packaging] Package naming question

2017-12-07 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 6 December 2017 at 05:33, Michal Sekletar wrote: > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > >> We have solved this years ago. man alternatives > > alternatives is a terrible solution if you ask me. Symlink hackery in > /etc/alternatives

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Package naming question

2017-12-06 Thread Michal Sekletar
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > We have solved this years ago. man alternatives alternatives is a terrible solution if you ask me. Symlink hackery in /etc/alternatives is awful and I these days with Fedora kernel supporting mount namespaces we could

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Package naming question

2017-12-05 Thread Björn Persson
"Tomasz Torcz" wrote: > December 4, 2017 11:21 PM, "Björn Persson" wrote: > > Is your package meant to be parallel-installable with the parallel > > package? If so, what is the program called, since /usr/bin/parallel is > > taken? Or is it meant to

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Package naming question

2017-12-05 Thread Tomasz Torcz
December 4, 2017 11:21 PM, "Björn Persson" wrote: > Is your package meant to be parallel-installable with the parallel > package? If so, what is the program called, since /usr/bin/parallel is > taken? Or is it meant to conflict with GNU Parallel? We have solved this years

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Package naming question

2017-12-04 Thread Björn Persson
Igor Gnatenko wrote: > I would like to hear opinion of other packagers about naming. We have > `parallel` utility implemented in Rust which is drop-in replacement for GNU > parallel. I was thinking how to name package and how people would expect it to > be named.