On 6 December 2017 at 05:33, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
>> We have solved this years ago. man alternatives
>
> alternatives is a terrible solution if you ask me. Symlink hackery in
> /etc/alternatives
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> We have solved this years ago. man alternatives
alternatives is a terrible solution if you ask me. Symlink hackery in
/etc/alternatives is awful and I these days with Fedora kernel
supporting mount namespaces we could
"Tomasz Torcz" wrote:
> December 4, 2017 11:21 PM, "Björn Persson" wrote:
> > Is your package meant to be parallel-installable with the parallel
> > package? If so, what is the program called, since /usr/bin/parallel is
> > taken? Or is it meant to
December 4, 2017 11:21 PM, "Björn Persson" wrote:
> Is your package meant to be parallel-installable with the parallel
> package? If so, what is the program called, since /usr/bin/parallel is
> taken? Or is it meant to conflict with GNU Parallel?
We have solved this years
Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> I would like to hear opinion of other packagers about naming. We have
> `parallel` utility implemented in Rust which is drop-in replacement for GNU
> parallel. I was thinking how to name package and how people would expect it to
> be named.