Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Broken dependencies: vim-syntastic

On Monday, November 14, 2016 4:37:57 PM CET Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 12:55:48 PM CET Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >> First off, the guidelines have: > >>

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Broken dependencies: vim-syntastic

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 12:55:48 PM CET Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> First off, the guidelines have: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Noarch_with_unported_dependencies >> >> I've been

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Broken dependencies: vim-syntastic

On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 12:55:48 PM CET Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > First off, the guidelines have: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Noarch_with_unported_dependencies > > I've been assuming that you're talking about the BuildRequires: case. > If you're just talking

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Broken dependencies: vim-syntastic

On 10/03/2016 08:53 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Even more interesting, %arm is not on ExclusiveArch list for > 'vim-syntastic-d' package, while the build on arm machine succeeded: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15919447 I drive-by fixed the ldc package on arm last night (I

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Broken dependencies: vim-syntastic

On Monday, October 3, 2016 8:53:41 AM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Monday, October 3, 2016 8:12:50 AM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:45:32 PM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > Thanks a lot for this discussion. I'll go (probably) the hacky > > > ExclusiveArch way,

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Broken dependencies: vim-syntastic

On Monday, October 3, 2016 8:12:50 AM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:45:32 PM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > Thanks a lot for this discussion. I'll go (probably) the hacky > > ExclusiveArch way, just because I want to give it a try. Once this > > becomes too tiring

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Broken dependencies: vim-syntastic

On Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:45:32 PM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Thanks a lot for this discussion. I'll go (probably) the hacky > ExclusiveArch way, just because I want to give it a try. Once this > becomes too tiring (because the package has non-trivial amount of > run-time-only

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Broken dependencies: vim-syntastic

> "PR" == Pavel Raiskup writes: PR> The design issue (probably hard to solve) is that there is no PR> automatic way to _not_ include such package into particular ARCH yum PR> repo; and we rather bother packagers. I'm not entirely sure how the compose tools would that a

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Broken dependencies: vim-syntastic

On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 12:55:48 PM CEST Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > First off, the guidelines have: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Noarch_with_unported_dependencies > > I've been assuming that you're talking about the BuildRequires: case. > If you're just

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Broken dependencies: vim-syntastic

First off, the guidelines have: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Noarch_with_unported_dependencies I've been assuming that you're talking about the BuildRequires: case. If you're just talking about the case where you can build it anywhere because you're just copying files

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Broken dependencies: vim-syntastic

On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 11:57:06 AM CEST Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "PR" == Pavel Raiskup writes: > > PR> Here comes the same argument as with ExclusiveArch .. I don't want > PR> to, because this _is_ noarch package and _is_ expected to work on > PR> all

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Broken dependencies: vim-syntastic

> "PR" == Pavel Raiskup writes: PR> Here comes the same argument as with ExclusiveArch .. I don't want PR> to, because this _is_ noarch package and _is_ expected to work on PR> all arches, at some point. It's not noarch, sorry. It doesn't work on all architectures,

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Broken dependencies: vim-syntastic

On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 11:37:09 AM CEST Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "PR" == Pavel Raiskup writes: > > PR> What's should packager do in such case? Recap: noarch package > PR> depends on arch-dependant package, which is not available > PR> everywhere. > >

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Broken dependencies: vim-syntastic

> "PR" == Pavel Raiskup writes: PR> What's should packager do in such case? Recap: noarch package PR> depends on arch-dependant package, which is not available PR> everywhere. Then the package is not noarch. Make it archful, add ExcludeArch: appropriately. - J<