W dniu 17.09.2019 o 08:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek pisze:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:33:49AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>> W dniu 11.09.2019 o 14:54, Miroslav Suchý pisze:
>>> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better?
>>
>> I migrated to F31 beta some time ago. Today decided to
>> go
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 08:25:49PM +0200, Guido Aulisi wrote:
> Errore:
> Problema: problem with installed package rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-
> 1.5.0-0.9.alpha.16.fc30.noarch
> - rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.9.alpha.16.fc30.noarch does not
> belong to a distupgrade repository
> - nothing
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:33:49AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 11.09.2019 o 14:54, Miroslav Suchý pisze:
> > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better?
>
> I migrated to F31 beta some time ago. Today decided to
> go with 'dnf distro-sync' instead of usual 'dnf update'
> command:
>
>
W dniu 11.09.2019 o 14:54, Miroslav Suchý pisze:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better?
I migrated to F31 beta some time ago. Today decided to
go with 'dnf distro-sync' instead of usual 'dnf update'
command:
Problem: problem with installed package kf5-ktexteditor-5.61.0-1.fc31.x86_64
-
Il giorno mer, 11/09/2019 alle 14.54 +0200, Miroslav Suchý ha scritto:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
>
> If you
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 7:14 PM Jerry James wrote:
> No errors for me, but 3 downgrades:
>
> Downgrading:
> gap-pkg-edim x86_64 1.3.3-6.fc31fedora78
> k
> gap-pkg-genssnoarch 1.6.5-6.fc31fedora56
> k
> python3-parso
On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 06:23 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 02:47:20PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> > Is this an error with gegl03?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703828
>
The update there seems to have fixed the issue and I now get
Dne 13. 09. 19 v 13:30 Solomon Peachy napsal(a):
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:48:44PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> There are a couple
>>> of F29 stragglers left behind from the last upgrade too. Not sure what
>>> I should file tickets about here..
>> There is `dnf autoremove`. You should try
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:48:44PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > There are a couple
> > of F29 stragglers left behind from the last upgrade too. Not sure what
> > I should file tickets about here..
>
> There is `dnf autoremove`. You should try that.
Hate to state the obvious, but blindly
Dne 11. 09. 19 v 17:04 Solomon Peachy napsal(a):
> There are a couple
> of F29 stragglers left behind from the last upgrade too. Not sure what
> I should file tickets about here..
There is `dnf autoremove`. You should try that.
Vít
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 07:33:17AM +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Problem 1: conflicting requests
>
> - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64
>
> Problem 2: module jmc:latest:3120190813124555:7188e41a-0.x86_64
> requires
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 02:47:20PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> I've since run
>
> sudo dnf module reset eclipse
>
> Which results in the following error when trying a distro-sync.
>
> Problem: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides module(eclipse) needed by module
>
W dniu 11.09.2019 o 14:54, Miroslav Suchý pisze:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
>
> If you get this prompt:
>
>
Thanks for letting me know!
On 12.09.19 10:06, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 05:18:36PM +0100, chedi toueiti wrote:
Error:
Problem 1: problem with installed package
mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64
- mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64 does not belong
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019, 10:24 AM Ankur Sinha, wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 10:48:51 -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> > - vtk-8.1.1-5.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
>
> There's vtk 8.2.0-6 that is already in F31 stable. So not sure what this
> implies:
>
On 9/12/19 1:37 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 07:12:37AM +0200, Franta Hanzlík wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:54:45 +0200
>> Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>
>>> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
>>> and try to run [*]:
>>>
>>>
I've since run
sudo dnf module reset eclipse
Which results in the following error when trying a distro-sync.
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(eclipse) needed by module
jmc:latest:3120190813124555:7188e41a-0.x86_64
Error:
Problem: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64
Hello,
I had a few problems. To clear some I had to run.
sudo dnf module reset libgit2
This resulted in the rest of the errors.
Modular dependency problems:
Problem 1: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
Dne 11. 09. 19 v 17:04 Solomon Peachy napsal(a):
> There are a couple
> of F29 stragglers left behind from the last upgrade too. Not sure what
> I should file tickets about here..
If the package does not cause an issue, then it can be left behind. But it can
be removed using
Dne 12. 09. 19 v 5:02 Harish Pillay napsal(a):
> after adding --allowerasing to the commandline.
Try it without it. The point is not to "pass it somehow", but pass it properly
according documentation. If erasing is
needed, then there is likely missing some obsolete somewhere.
--
Miroslav
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 02:57:55PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:37:42PM +0200, Martin Kolman wrote:
> > Looks like I have something uniqe I haven't seen in the other mails,
> > related to packit:
> >
> > $ LANG=en_US sudo dnf --releasever=31
> >
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:37:42PM +0200, Martin Kolman wrote:
> Looks like I have something uniqe I haven't seen in the other mails, related
> to packit:
>
> $ LANG=en_US sudo dnf --releasever=31
> --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 --enablerepo=updates-testing
> distro-sync
> RCM Tools
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 03:23:43PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> So, aeskulap was orphaned. I don't even see an F31 branch somehow:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/aeskulap/branches?branchname=master
>
> What should be done here?
>
> > - dcmtk-3.6.2-4.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a
Looks like I have something uniqe I haven't seen in the other mails, related to
packit:
$ LANG=en_US sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
--enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
RCM Tools for Fedora 31 (RPMs)
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
The third one, python3-parso, has builds for 0.5.1-2.fc30 and
0.5.1-2.fc32, but there is no 0.5.1-2 build for fc31.
File a bug please. It's against the guidelines to have a
higher-numbered build in F30 compared to F31. Maintainers need
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 10:48:51 -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> Problem 2: package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires
> libdcmdata.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires
> libdcmimage.so.12()(64bit), but
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 07:12:37AM +0200, Franta Hanzlík wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:54:45 +0200
> Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> > and try to run [*]:
> >
> > sudo dnf --releasever=31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 07:14:43PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> The third one, python3-parso, has builds for 0.5.1-2.fc30 and
> 0.5.1-2.fc32, but there is no 0.5.1-2 build for fc31.
File a bug please. It's against the guidelines to have a
higher-numbered build in F30 compared to F31. Maintainers
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:30:12PM -0400, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 9:01 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> > and try to run [*]:
> >
> > sudo dnf --releasever=31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:42:27PM -0400, Code Zombie wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here's my output (I am running F30):
>
> Problem 1: problem with installed package eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch
> - eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
> - nothing provides
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:30:51AM -0500, Ron Olson wrote:
> This is what I got:
>
> Error:
> Problem 1: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 requires
> libIlmImf-2_2.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> installed
> - OpenEXR-libs-2.2.0-16.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a
>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 05:18:36PM +0100, chedi toueiti wrote:
> Error:
> Problem 1: problem with installed package
> mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64
> - mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
> - nothing provides
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:10:41AM -0400, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> On 9/11/19 8:54 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> > and try to run [*]:
> >
> > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> >
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:51:42PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:48:51AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:16:28PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> > > > time
On 9/12/19 9:52 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 11. 09. 19 v 17:14 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
sudo dnf module disable libgit2 standard-test-roles
sudo dnf remove rust-libgit2-sys-devel
sudo dnf upgrade libgit2
sudo dnf module reset libgit2
is option as well.
Thanks this worked.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:55 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
>
> If you get this
Dne 11. 09. 19 v 17:14 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> sudo dnf module disable libgit2 standard-test-roles
> sudo dnf remove rust-libgit2-sys-devel
> sudo dnf upgrade libgit2
sudo dnf module reset libgit2
is option as well.
The question is how to handle this generally.
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:54:45 +0200
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
> ...
# dnf
Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
A variant:
# dnf --releasever=31
* on the Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:54:45PM +0200, Miroslav Such? was commenting:
| Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run [*]:
|
| sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
--enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
|
| If
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 6:55 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run [*]:
No errors for me, but 3 downgrades:
Downgrading:
gap-pkg-edim x86_64 1.3.3-6.fc31fedora78 k
gap-pkg-genss
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 11:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:48:51AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:16:28PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> > > > time and try to
I rebase on silverblue, flawless..
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 9:01 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
>
Error:
Problem 1: package
Hi
Here's my output (I am running F30):
Problem 1: problem with installed package eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch
- eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- nothing provides jgit = 5.3.0-5.fc31 needed by
eclipse-jgit-5.3.0-5.fc31.noarch
Problem 2:
Here's the error I run into on my desktop:
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch
- eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- nothing provides jgit = 5.3.0-5.fc31 needed by
eclipse-jgit-5.3.0-5.fc31.noarch
Error:
Problem 1: problem with installed package
mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64
- mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- nothing provides mono(ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib) = 1.1.0.0 needed by
mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-15.fc31.x86_64
Problem 2:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:48:51AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:16:28PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> > > time and try to run [*]:
> > >
> > > sudo dnf --releasever=31
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
and try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
--enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
>
> If you get this prompt:
On ppc64le power8 Fedora 30 server(?) image on PowerVM 2.1.1.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 04:55:05PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote:
> A few errors reported when testing on KDE (one ticket for problem 4
> at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751242):
>
> Error:
> Problem 1: package plasma-discover-snap-5.15.5-1.fc30.x86_64
> requires plasma-discover =
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:48:51AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> System 2: (Workstation)
Adding in --allowerasing allows the upgrade to proceed:
Removing dependent packages:
0ad x86_64 0.0.23b-6.fc30 @fedora 16 M
aeskulap x86_64
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:16:28PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> > time and try to run [*]:
> >
> > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
Here's an
W dniu 11.09.2019 o 14:54, Miroslav Suchý pisze:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
Had to remove 'openshot' (FTBFS
My attempt revealed these errors
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64
Error:
Problem 1: problem with installed package
eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.module_f30+5264+0fe54b96.noarch
-
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 08:33:24AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Not sure where this one should go but looks like there's a problem with
> policycoreutils-python...
>
> Problem 5: problem with installed package unifi-5.10.25-1.fc30.x86_64
> - package unifi-5.10.25-2.fc31.x86_64 requires
This is what I got:
Error:
Problem 1: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 requires
libIlmImf-2_2.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- OpenEXR-libs-2.2.0-16.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- problem with installed package
On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 14:54 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
>
> If you get this prompt:
On 9/11/19 8:54 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
>
> If you get this prompt:
>
> ...
>
A few errors reported when testing on KDE (one ticket for problem 4 at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751242):
Error:
Problem 1: package plasma-discover-snap-5.15.5-1.fc30.x86_64 requires
plasma-discover = 5.15.5-1.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed
-
I separated the policycoreutils one since it seemed more dire but here's my
full output (with some RPM Fusion specific stuff filtered out):
Modular dependency problems:
Problem 1: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
-Original message-
> From:Miroslav Suchý
> Sent: Wednesday 11th September 2019 12:55
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> Subject: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
Not sure where this one should go but looks like there's a problem with
policycoreutils-python...
Problem 5: problem with installed package unifi-5.10.25-1.fc30.x86_64
- package unifi-5.10.25-2.fc31.x86_64 requires policycoreutils-python,
but none of the providers can be installed
-
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package
bat-0.10.0-1.module_f30+4037+f98ba4b0.x86_64
- package bat-0.11.0-3.module_f31+5338+1c55392b.x86_64 requires
libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- bat-0.10.0-1.module_f30+4037+f98ba4b0.x86_64 does not belong to a
63 matches
Mail list logo
