Once upon a time, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com said:
The Fedora Server Product will provide a standard deployment mechanism for a
Linux Database Server (powered by the postgresql project).
How about just calling this the PostgreSQL Server role? Why should this
get the generic database
On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 08:03 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com said:
The Fedora Server Product will provide a standard deployment mechanism for
a
Linux Database Server (powered by the postgresql project).
How about just calling this the
Am 20.01.2015 um 15:28 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 08:03 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com said:
The Fedora Server Product will provide a standard deployment mechanism for a
Linux Database Server (powered by the postgresql
Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com said:
One of the core focuses of Fedora Server is to simplify things. It's
meant to help less-experienced users of Linux get up and running with
common activities more quickly. Providing the PostgreSQL role and the
MariaDB role means that
- Original Message -
Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com said:
One of the core focuses of Fedora Server is to simplify things. It's
meant to help less-experienced users of Linux get up and running with
common activities more quickly. Providing the PostgreSQL role
== Scope ==
* Release engineering:
** Pre-loading roles will need to be a capability of the Anaconda install
system, both in the graphical installer and kickstart
While this functionality is desirable, it seems not to be directly related to
the database server.
Mirek
--
devel mailing
On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 10:20 -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
== Scope ==
* Release engineering:
** Pre-loading roles will need to be a capability of the Anaconda install
system, both in the graphical installer and kickstart
While this functionality is desirable, it seems not to be
