> "AI" == Artur Iwicki writes:
AI> I imagine the reason is that this allows us to add new
AI> architectures to FPC and do some trial-and-error builds of FPC
AI> without affecting dependent packages - if FPC itself used
AI> %{fpc_arches}, then adding new architectures to FPC would require
AI>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:35:23AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Free_Pascal_Compiler_3.2.0
>
> == Summary ==
> Update the Free Pascal Compiler used within Fedora to version 3.2.0,
> once it is published, and enable building (previously unsupported)
> AArch64
Il 11/10/19 11:39, Artur Iwicki ha scritto:
> Yes, dependent packages should use %{fpc_arches}. FPC itself doesn't do that.
>
Ah, I misunderstood the phrase `Add AArch64 and ppc64le to the
`ExclusiveArch:` tag in the package spec.`.
I thought you were saying to add those ExclusiveArch to all
Yes, dependent packages should use %{fpc_arches}. FPC itself doesn't do that.
I imagine the reason is that this allows us to add new architectures to FPC and
do some trial-and-error builds of FPC without affecting dependent packages - if
FPC itself used %{fpc_arches}, then adding new
FPC 3.2.0 hasn't been released yet - this Change Proposal is a bit of a early
heads-up. The FPC website says it should be out before the end of the year.
Once it's released, after updating rawhide, a COPR repo can be prepared.
___
devel mailing list --
Il 10/10/19 16:35, Ben Cotton ha scritto:
> == Scope ==
> All packages depending on `fpc` should be rebuilt with the new `fpc`
> once it hits F32, or, if there is not enough time for that, just all
> packages built after the new `fpc` hits the buildroots.
>
> * Proposal owners:
> ** Update the
Is there a COPR available for testing?
hedgewars just released 1.0 and I need to see if I have any issues with the
new compiler stack, especially since it looks like I won't need ExcludeArch
anymore.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list --
