Review swaps

[Kan-Ru Chen]

Hi all,

I have 3 packages awaiting reviews. I'm happy to exchange.

First is a new IBus input method (code includes bits of C and Python):

  ibus-array: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275556

The other two are trivial rust packages that I need for upcoming libchewing 
release:

  rust-xflags-macrios: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276537
  rust-xflags: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276539

Cheers,
Kan-ru
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SoPlex and SCIP review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 10:05 AM Benson Muite
 wrote:
> Will get mine done tomorrow.

I'd just like to give a shout out to Benson, who has done the lion's
share of the reviews for this effort.  Thank you, Benson!  You have
been an enormous help.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SoPlex and SCIP review swaps

[Benson Muite]

On 20/02/2024 19.08, Kai A. Hiller wrote:
> I’ll take care of scip. I’d be glad if you could take a look at one or
> more of these (not urgent, though):
> 
> golang-gopkg-macaroon2:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2250314
> golang-github-matrix-org-util:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250311
> golang-github-matrix-org-gomatrix:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2250312
> 
 - papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
 - soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
 - scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
 - coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363

 These will need to be reviewed with respect to the [COPR mentioned
 above](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/SCIP/), since I
 can't build asl in Rawhide without breaking the existing mp package,
 so the rest all has to be done at once in a side tag.

 Let me know what I can review for you in exchange for the above
 reviews.
>>> Thanks to Benson Muite, papilo has been reviewed and soplex is under
>>> review.  I still need reviewers for scip and coin-or-HiGHS.  If you
>>> don't have a package that needs review right now, I can give you a
>>> rain check, or I can do some other task for you.
>> I still need a reviewer for scip.  If we can get the last couple of
>> reviews finished by tomorrow, I will still have time to get this all
>> built before F40 beta freeze.  Please help.
Will get mine done tomorrow.
> -- 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SoPlex and SCIP review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 9:09 AM Kai A. Hiller  wrote:
> I’ll take care of scip. I’d be glad if you could take a look at one or
> more of these (not urgent, though):
>
> golang-gopkg-macaroon2:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2250314
> golang-github-matrix-org-util:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250311
> golang-github-matrix-org-gomatrix:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2250312

Will do.  Thank you, Kai!
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SoPlex and SCIP review swaps

[Kai A. Hiller]

I’ll take care of scip. I’d be glad if you could take a look at one or 
more of these (not urgent, though):


golang-gopkg-macaroon2: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2250314
golang-github-matrix-org-util: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250311
golang-github-matrix-org-gomatrix: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2250312


On 2024-02-20 16:58, Jerry James wrote:

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 2:22 PM Jerry James  wrote:

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:11 AM Jerry James  wrote:

On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:10 PM Jerry James  wrote:

I need reviews for the following new packages.  I am willing to swap reviews.
- asl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354
- ccluster: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253355
- lusol: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253356
- pdqsort: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253357
- zimpl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253358
- zstr: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253359
- papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
- soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
- scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
- coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363
- spasm: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253364

Just a few package reviews to go!  This is what remains to be done:

- papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
- soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
- scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
- coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363

These will need to be reviewed with respect to the [COPR mentioned
above](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/SCIP/), since I
can't build asl in Rawhide without breaking the existing mp package,
so the rest all has to be done at once in a side tag.

Let me know what I can review for you in exchange for the above reviews.

Thanks to Benson Muite, papilo has been reviewed and soplex is under
review.  I still need reviewers for scip and coin-or-HiGHS.  If you
don't have a package that needs review right now, I can give you a
rain check, or I can do some other task for you.

I still need a reviewer for scip.  If we can get the last couple of
reviews finished by tomorrow, I will still have time to get this all
built before F40 beta freeze.  Please help.

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SoPlex and SCIP review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 2:22 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:11 AM Jerry James  wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:10 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> > > I need reviews for the following new packages.  I am willing to swap 
> > > reviews.
> > > - asl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354
> > > - ccluster: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253355
> > > - lusol: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253356
> > > - pdqsort: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253357
> > > - zimpl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253358
> > > - zstr: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253359
> > > - papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
> > > - soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
> > > - scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
> > > - coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363
> > > - spasm: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253364
> >
> > Just a few package reviews to go!  This is what remains to be done:
> >
> > - papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
> > - soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
> > - scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
> > - coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363
> >
> > These will need to be reviewed with respect to the [COPR mentioned
> > above](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/SCIP/), since I
> > can't build asl in Rawhide without breaking the existing mp package,
> > so the rest all has to be done at once in a side tag.
> >
> > Let me know what I can review for you in exchange for the above reviews.
>
> Thanks to Benson Muite, papilo has been reviewed and soplex is under
> review.  I still need reviewers for scip and coin-or-HiGHS.  If you
> don't have a package that needs review right now, I can give you a
> rain check, or I can do some other task for you.

I still need a reviewer for scip.  If we can get the last couple of
reviews finished by tomorrow, I will still have time to get this all
built before F40 beta freeze.  Please help.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SoPlex and SCIP review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:11 AM Jerry James  wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:10 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> > I need reviews for the following new packages.  I am willing to swap 
> > reviews.
> > - asl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354
> > - ccluster: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253355
> > - lusol: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253356
> > - pdqsort: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253357
> > - zimpl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253358
> > - zstr: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253359
> > - papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
> > - soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
> > - scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
> > - coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363
> > - spasm: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253364
>
> Just a few package reviews to go!  This is what remains to be done:
>
> - papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
> - soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
> - scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
> - coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363
>
> These will need to be reviewed with respect to the [COPR mentioned
> above](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/SCIP/), since I
> can't build asl in Rawhide without breaking the existing mp package,
> so the rest all has to be done at once in a side tag.
>
> Let me know what I can review for you in exchange for the above reviews.

Thanks to Benson Muite, papilo has been reviewed and soplex is under
review.  I still need reviewers for scip and coin-or-HiGHS.  If you
don't have a package that needs review right now, I can give you a
rain check, or I can do some other task for you.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: SoPlex and SCIP review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:10 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> I need reviews for the following new packages.  I am willing to swap reviews.
> - asl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354
> - ccluster: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253355
> - lusol: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253356
> - pdqsort: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253357
> - zimpl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253358
> - zstr: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253359
> - papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
> - soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
> - scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
> - coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363
> - spasm: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253364

Just a few package reviews to go!  This is what remains to be done:

- papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
- soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
- scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
- coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363

These will need to be reviewed with respect to the [COPR mentioned
above](https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/SCIP/), since I
can't build asl in Rawhide without breaking the existing mp package,
so the rest all has to be done at once in a side tag.

Let me know what I can review for you in exchange for the above reviews.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Two review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 7:31 PM Lyes Saadi  wrote:
> I have two review requests I'd like to swap with anyone willing to !

I have taken both reviews.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Two review swaps

[Lyes Saadi]

Hello and happy holidays !

I have two review requests I'd like to swap with anyone willing to !

1. python-pyfiglet : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876108
This one has been in a legal hell for a 3 years ! But, it is finally freed from 
legal and updated to the new guidelines ! I'm swapping this because it would 
otherwise never get reviewed ^^'. Everything concerning legalese should be 
sorted and it had initially been approved, but it might cause you some trouble 
if you are allergic to anything legal :P.

2. python-willow : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255935
Just a simple dependency needed to upgrade Setzer ! This package though needs 
another one to be updated before being shipped to Fedora, I'm just hoping to 
get it approved so that I can push it as soon as the dependency in question is 
updated. A successful COPR build with the updated dependency is provided, so 
that shouldn't be a problem.

Happy holidays,
Lyes Saadi--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps for deps needed for conda update

[Orion Poplawski]

On 12/2/23 19:32, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I have a number of packages needing review that are required for the 
latest round of updates to the conda package manager:


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2025802_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=13378412#

I'm particularly excited by libmamba and its micromamba 
package/executable as a faster/leaner replacement for conda itself.


Just for the record - Jerry James picked up the reviews.  Big shout out 
for that!


--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his  - surely the least important thing about me
IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

SoPlex and SCIP review swaps

[Jerry James]

Kevin Kofler noted about a year ago [1] that new versions of the solvers
SoPlex [2] and SCIP [3] were released under free software licenses.  Over the
last year, I've been working little by little on building them in a COPR [4]
and rebuilding various Fedora packages with SoPlex and SCIP support.  I
believe we have reached the point where we can start integrating this work
into Fedora.

References:
[1] 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GGGRTBI3ZQYXMNLTPAYCW5IT4FYNY6GX/
[2] https://soplex.zib.de/
[3] https://scipopt.org/
[4] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/SCIP/

I need reviews for the following new packages.  I am willing to swap reviews.
- asl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253354
- ccluster: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253355
- lusol: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253356
- pdqsort: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253357
- zimpl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253358
- zstr: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253359
- papilo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253360
- soplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253361
- scip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253362
- coin-or-HiGHS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253363
- spasm: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2253364

I will shortly open pull requests for each of the following packages.  I wanted
to post this message first so that the PR text can include a reference to it.
- bliss
- coin-or-Alps
- coin-or-Bcp
- coin-or-Bcps
- coin-or-Blis
- coin-or-Bonmin
- coin-or-Cbc
- coin-or-Cgl
- coin-or-Clp
- coin-or-CoinMP
- coin-or-CoinUtils
- coin-or-Couenne
- coin-or-Dip
- coin-or-DyLP
- coin-or-FlopC++
- coin-or-lemon
- coin-or-Ipopt
- coin-or-OS
- coin-or-Osi
- coin-or-SYMPHONY
- freefem++
- gfan
- latte-integrale
- Macaulay2
- mp
- opencv
- openms
- polymake
- python-cyipopt
- python-pysingular
- qsopt-ex
- seqan
- seqan2
- seqan3
- Singular
- sympol
- TOPCOM

ASL vs. mp
--
Many of the coin-or packages currently BuildRequires mp-devel.  They really
only need the ASL part of mp.  Upstream has split the two projects into
separate git repositories; see the new asl package listed above.  This will
reduce the number of runtime dependencies for the coin-or packages.

Since the new asl package conflicts with the current mp package, the
introduction of asl, modification of mp, and rebuilding of affected coin-or
packages all need to be done at once.  Once all of the reviews are complete,
they will be built in a side tag.

i386 removal

Some of the new packages need some work to build correctly on i386.  Why
bother?  Let's not build for i386 in the first place.  That means, however,
that some of the packages that sit on top of them will need to be modified to
stop building for i386 as well.  That is the extent of the modifications to
some of these packages (e.g., freefem++).

Since opencv and openms are both still built for i386, the packages that they
depend on (including the new asl package) must also be built for i386 for now.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps for deps needed for conda update

[Orion Poplawski]

I have a number of packages needing review that are required for the 
latest round of updates to the conda package manager:


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2025802_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=13378412#

I'm particularly excited by libmamba and its micromamba 
package/executable as a faster/leaner replacement for conda itself.


I think I have some bandwidth now to do some reviews in exchange.

Thanks.

--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his  - surely the least important thing about me
IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 07:05:35PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 09:16:41AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> > Who would like to swap package reviews?  I've got 4 packages that need to be
> > reviewed:
> > 
> > ocaml-ptime: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242903
> > ocaml-crunch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242904
> > ocaml-stdlib-random: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242905
> 
> I should be able to look at the OCaml ones, but not til Monday,
> so if anyone wants to take them in the meantime please go ahead.

I just took these 3.  Looking at them right now.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 09:16:41AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> Who would like to swap package reviews?  I've got 4 packages that need to be
> reviewed:
> 
> ocaml-ptime: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242903
> ocaml-crunch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242904
> ocaml-stdlib-random: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242905

I should be able to look at the OCaml ones, but not til Monday,
so if anyone wants to take them in the meantime please go ahead.

Rich.

> JUnitParams: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247877
> 
> Let me know what I can review for you.
> 
> A note for those trying to get us to move from this mailing list to
> discussion.fedoraproject.org.  I have been asking for these reviews there for 
> 3
> weeks now [1], and am getting nowhere.  We don't seem to have a critical mass
> of packagers looking there for package reviews.
> 
> [1] 
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/1-c-1-java-and-3-ocaml-reviews/93946
> --
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/

> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Benson Muite]

On 11/17/23 19:16, Jerry James wrote:
> Who would like to swap package reviews?  I've got 4 packages that need
> to be reviewed:
> 
> ocaml-ptime: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242903
> 
> ocaml-crunch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242904
> 
> ocaml-stdlib-random: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242905
> 
> JUnitParams: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247877
> 
> 
Will take JUnitParams
> Let me know what I can review for you.
> 
> A note for those trying to get us to move from this mailing list to
> discussion.fedoraproject.org .  I
> have been asking for these reviews there for 3 weeks now [1], and am
> getting nowhere.  We don't seem to have a critical mass of packagers
> looking there for package reviews.
> 
> [1]
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/1-c-1-java-and-3-ocaml-reviews/93946 
> 
> -- 
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/ 
> 
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

Who would like to swap package reviews?  I've got 4 packages that need to
be reviewed:

ocaml-ptime: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242903
ocaml-crunch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242904
ocaml-stdlib-random: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242905
JUnitParams: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247877

Let me know what I can review for you.

A note for those trying to get us to move from this mailing list to
discussion.fedoraproject.org.  I have been asking for these reviews there
for 3 weeks now [1], and am getting nowhere.  We don't seem to have a
critical mass of packagers looking there for package reviews.

[1]
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/1-c-1-java-and-3-ocaml-reviews/93946
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps - hyprland packages

[Pavel Solovev]

Could someone (perhaps someone interested in Hyprland) please review:

hyprland-protocols - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244285
hyprland - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244377
xdg-desktop-portal-hyprland - 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2244378

I'd love to offer a review swap, but note I'm not very experienced in it.

Thanks!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Trivial review swaps

[Leigh Scott]

I have this simple review pending if you interested.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213540
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Trivial review swaps

[Mattia Verga via devel]

Hello folks,

I have a couple of trivial packages waiting for reviews:

- libahp-gt - Driver library for the AHP GT Controllers 
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237299)
- libahp-xc - Driver library for the AHP XC Correlators 
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237300)

I'd happy to swap reviews with anyone in need. Comments from new 
packagers in need of sponsorship are welcome (though I'm not a sponsor).

Thank you

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:35 PM Scott Talbert  wrote:
> I'm happy to take cvc5, since I just packaged it for Debian a little while
> back.  But yeah, it would be nice to have a working fedora-review.

Thank you, Scott.  Having someone familiar with cvc5 review it would be great.

Like I just told Richard, there is a thread about fixing fedora-review
in place: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/QMCHW3ZUTKLPIDARUFKPINA3VBSI3OT5/

I've used that to do ... what?  Four reviews, I think?  I haven't
encountered any trouble so far.  (Which doesn't mean you won't, of
course!)
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:26 PM Richard W.M. Jones  wrote:
> Just to let you know I'm still up for reviewing those ocaml-* packages
> (without swaps), but I'm waiting on a final resolution of
> fedora-review on Rawhide.

Thank you.  I can wait. :-)

I started a thread about fixing fedora-review in place, although I
won't claim that is a good idea:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/QMCHW3ZUTKLPIDARUFKPINA3VBSI3OT5/
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Scott Talbert]

On Wed, 19 Jul 2023, Jerry James wrote:


Finally, a replacement for the existing cvc4 package:
cvc5: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223012


I'm happy to take cvc5, since I just packaged it for Debian a little while 
back.  But yeah, it would be nice to have a working fedora-review.


Scott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Richard W.M. Jones]

Just to let you know I'm still up for reviewing those ocaml-* packages
(without swaps), but I'm waiting on a final resolution of
fedora-review on Rawhide.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines.  Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.  http://libguestfs.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

Hi all,

Is anyone interested in swapping reviews?  I've got some nontrivial
packages awaiting review, and am willing to review nontrivial packages
in exchange.

Font packages needed to update MuseScore to 4.x:
makemusic-finale-fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347
edwin-fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180241
leland-fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180242

MuseScore 4.1.0, along with a package rename:
musescore: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180243

All of the above are available in a COPR:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jjames/MuseScore4/

Finally, a replacement for the existing cvc4 package:
cvc5: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223012

Thank you!
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps for easy Rust packages

[Fabio Valentini]

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:21 AM Fabio Valentini  wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In order to update the "log" crate (the canonical logging facade for
> Rust; packaged as rust-log) to the latest version, I need to package a
> few new dependencies. Some have already been updated / built in a
> rawhide side tag (f39-build-side-69898), but some are still missing. I
> hope to be able to finish this update before the mass rebuild happens,
> otherwise the packages will be broken.

Sorry, that was a typo, it should've been f39-build-side-69808.
Packages that are pending review can be test-built against the
packages in this side tag.

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps for easy Rust packages

[Fabio Valentini]

Hi all,

In order to update the "log" crate (the canonical logging facade for
Rust; packaged as rust-log) to the latest version, I need to package a
few new dependencies. Some have already been updated / built in a
rawhide side tag (f39-build-side-69898), but some are still missing. I
hope to be able to finish this update before the mass rebuild happens,
otherwise the packages will be broken.

The packages that are still pending review are very simple. They are
100% unmodified output of rust2rpm, with tests enabled, with license
files included, etc. I can offer to review similarly simple packages
(Rust, Python, CMake, meson) in return.

- rust-sval_test: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217030
- rust-sval_ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217032
- rust-sval_buffer: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217037
- rust-sval_fmt: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217034
- rust-serde_buf: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217023
- rust-sval_serde: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217044
- rust-value-bag-serde1: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217024
- rust-value-bag-sval2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217056

I'm also waiting for reviews of the missing dependencies of ntpd-rs
(an NTP implementation with NTS support written in Rust):

- rust-tower: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214392
- rust-tower-http: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214428
- rust-axum: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214429
- rust-prometheus-client: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214431

These are pretty simple packages as well, but not quite 100%
boilerplate as the sval/value-bag stuff.

I've also submitted a review for the "gimoji" application:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214339

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: review swaps

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 12:17:09AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hi Zbigniew,
> 
> 
> On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 11:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>  wrote:
> >
> > I have a bunch of nice python packages looking for a reviewer:
> >
> > #2121902 pyinstrument - Python profiler with colorful output
> 
> I've taken the profiler. Do you think you could take 2180418? I would
> really appreciate your input.

Thanks. It's definitely an interesting package ;). I left some initial
comments.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: review swaps

[Alexander Ploumistos]

Hi Zbigniew,


On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 11:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
 wrote:
>
> I have a bunch of nice python packages looking for a reviewer:
>
> #2121902 pyinstrument - Python profiler with colorful output

I've taken the profiler. Do you think you could take 2180418? I would
really appreciate your input.
pyinstrument seems simple enough, I think I might be able to take on
another review if nobody else steps up.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

review swaps

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

I have a bunch of nice python packages looking for a reviewer:

#2121902 pyinstrument - Python profiler with colorful output
#2203529 blosc2 - High performance compressor optimized for binary data
#2203544 python-ndindex - Python library for manipulating indices of ndarrays
#2203546 python-blosc2 - Python wrapper for the Blosc2 compression library

The last three are for python-tables update to the latest version.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Alexander Ploumistos]

Hello Jerry,

I've taken the musescore review (I haven't been able to keep up with
the font packaging changes).
Could you please have a look at this package in return?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180418
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Benson Muite]

On 3/21/23 08:18, Riya Bisht wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm interested in reviewing packages. Can you tell me how do I start ?
> I'm beginner trying to understand fedora packaging.
> 
Welcome to Fedora!
https://jamezone.org/pleasure/software/Fedora/packager/
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/
> Thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Riya Bisht]

Hello,

I'm interested in reviewing packages. Can you tell me how do I start ? I'm
beginner trying to understand fedora packaging.

Thanks.



On Tue, 21 Mar 2023, 8:58 am Jerry James,  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I am in need of some package reviews, and am happy to swap.  First, I
> think I have finally beaten MuseScore 4.x into good enough shape for
> Fedora.  This has been a months-long process.  I need some font
> reviews:
>
> makemusic-finale-fonts:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347
> edwin-fonts
> :
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180241
> leland-fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180242
>
> We currently have MuseScore in the mscore package.  I have been asked
> a couple of times to rename the package to musescore, to make it
> easier for users to discover.  Here is a rename review, while
> simultaneously changing to version 4.0.2, just to make things more
> complicated:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180243
>
> I also have a couple of simple python packages that need reviews, but
> these are lower priority for me than the reviews above.
>
> python-accessible-pygments:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176933
> python-pytest-cython
> :
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173018
>
> Regards,
> --
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

Hi all,

I am in need of some package reviews, and am happy to swap.  First, I
think I have finally beaten MuseScore 4.x into good enough shape for
Fedora.  This has been a months-long process.  I need some font
reviews:

makemusic-finale-fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347
edwin-fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180241
leland-fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180242

We currently have MuseScore in the mscore package.  I have been asked
a couple of times to rename the package to musescore, to make it
easier for users to discover.  Here is a rename review, while
simultaneously changing to version 4.0.2, just to make things more
complicated:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180243

I also have a couple of simple python packages that need reviews, but
these are lower priority for me than the reviews above.

python-accessible-pygments: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176933
python-pytest-cython: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173018

Regards,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Mattia Verga via devel]

I have filed a few package requests to get python's openapi-core into
Fedora repositories, each one depends on the previous one:

- python-pathable https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154186
  |- python-jsonschema-spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154188
     |- python-openapi-spec-validator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154236
     |- python-openapi-core
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2154240

They should be all quite straightforward, I can swap some reviews in
exchange.

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Jonny Heggheim]

Hello fellow packagers,

I'd like to ask your help for a handful of reviews.

Most of them are Lua dependencies for the SILE Typesetter,
any help is appreciated.

I offer my help in exchange for reviews, I have experience with Java, Python,
Lua, C and C++ packages.

Best regards,

Jonny Heggheim

lua-fluent - Lua implementation of Project Fluent:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142798 

lua-cliargs - A command-line argument parser:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143056 

lua-vstruct - Lua library to manipulate binary data:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143351 

lua-cosmo - Safe templates for Lua:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142671 

lua-luarepl - REPL.lua a reusable Lua REPL written in Lua:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143382 

lua-linenoise - A binding for the linenoise command line library:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143020 

lua-cldr - Lua interface to Unicode CLDR data:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142653 

lua-zlib - Simple streaming interface to zlib for Lua:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143050 

lua-epnf - Extended PEG Notation Format (easy grammars for LPeg):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142786 

lua-utf8 - A UTF-8 support module for Lua:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143391 

lua-loadkit - Loadkit allows you to load arbitrary files within the Lua package 
path:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143028 

libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626 

hack-fonts - A typeface designed for source code:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149686 

sile - The SILE Typesetter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149698 

randomx - A proof-of-work algorithm that is optimized for general-purpose CPUs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2078535
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review Swaps

[Mark E. Fuller]

Hi all,

I have two packages for which I'd like to offer to swap reviews:

1) Bug 2135036 - Review Request: golang-github-sajari-fuzzy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2135036

This is a new dependency blocking an update to one of my existing (Go) 
packages. Autogenerated spec, should be a trivial review.


2) Bug 2126785 - Review Request: usbrelay
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126785

USB-connected electrical relay control, based on hidapi


Thank you

--
Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.
ful...@fedoraproject.org
ful...@mefuller.dev
@fuller:fedora.im
@fuller:one.ems.host
https://mefuller.dev
PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

[Gwyn Ciesla via devel]

Wi do, thank you!

-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
 
in your fear, seek only peace 
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, October 5th, 2022 at 7:10 AM, Mattia Verga via devel 
 wrote:


> Il 04/10/22 17:34, Gwyn Ciesla via devel ha scritto:
> 

> > Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If 
> > you'd be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more 
> > of yours.
> > 

> > QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838
> > CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
> > indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014
> > 

> > And if you're feeling really generous, this unrelated review:
> > 

> > libchipcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958
> > 

> > Thanks in advance!
> > 

> > 

> 

> I've taken CalcMySky.
> 

> If you have some time to spare, I'd like a review of XEphem 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123242
> 

> Mattia

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

[Mattia Verga via devel]

Il 04/10/22 17:34, Gwyn Ciesla via devel ha scritto:

> Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If you'd 
> be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more of 
> yours.
>
> QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838
> CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
> indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014
>
> And if you're feeling really generous, this unrelated review:
>
> libchipcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958
>
> Thanks in advance!

I've taken CalcMySky.

If you have some time to spare, I'd like a review of XEphem 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123242

Mattia___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

[Dan Horák]

On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 16:14:08 +
Mattia Verga via devel  wrote:

> Il 04/10/22 17:46, Dan Horák ha scritto:
> > On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 +
> > Gwyn Ciesla via devel  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If 
> >> you'd be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or 
> >> more of yours.
> >>
> >> QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838
> >> CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
> >> indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014
> > I have taken indi
> 
> INDI is already packaged, see "libindi".
> 
> I'm about to update it to the latest version (1.9.8).

I have vaguely recalled that we have something like "indi", but I
searched only for "indi", not for "*indi*" :-)

Taking QXlsx then ...


Dan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

[Gwyn Ciesla via devel]

Thank you!



-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
 
in your fear, seek only peace 
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, October 4th, 2022 at 11:14 AM, Mattia Verga via devel 
 wrote:


> Il 04/10/22 17:46, Dan Horák ha scritto:
> 

> > On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 +
> > Gwyn Ciesla via devel devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > 

> > > Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If 
> > > you'd be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or 
> > > more of yours.
> > > 

> > > QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838
> > > CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
> > > indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014
> > > I have taken indi
> 

> 

> INDI is already packaged, see "libindi".
> 

> I'm about to update it to the latest version (1.9.8).
> 

> Mattia
> 

> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

[Mattia Verga via devel]

Il 04/10/22 17:46, Dan Horák ha scritto:
> On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 +
> Gwyn Ciesla via devel  wrote:
>
>> Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If 
>> you'd be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more 
>> of yours.
>>
>> QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838
>> CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
>> indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014
> I have taken indi

INDI is already packaged, see "libindi".

I'm about to update it to the latest version (1.9.8).

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

[Gwyn Ciesla via devel]

Thank you, on it!



-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
 
in your fear, seek only peace 
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

--- Original Message ---
On Tuesday, October 4th, 2022 at 10:46 AM, Dan Horák  wrote:


> On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 +
> Gwyn Ciesla via devel devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> 

> > Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If 
> > you'd be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more 
> > of yours.
> > 

> > QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838
> > CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
> > indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014
> 

> 

> I have taken indi and would appreciate a review for pageedit
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2131949), it
> should be pretty straightforward
> 

> 

> Dan
> 

> > And if you're feeling really generous, this unrelated review:
> > 

> > libchipcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958
> > 

> > Thanks in advance!
> > 

> > --
> > Gwyn Ciesla
> > she/her/hers
> > 
> > in your fear, seek only peace
> > in your fear, seek only love
> > -d. bowie
> > 

> > Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> 

> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

[Dan Horák]

On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 +
Gwyn Ciesla via devel  wrote:

> Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If you'd 
> be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more of 
> yours.
> 
> QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838
> CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
> indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014

I have taken indi and would appreciate a review for pageedit
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2131949), it
should be pretty straightforward


Dan

> 
> And if you're feeling really generous, this unrelated review:
> 
> libchipcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> -- 
> Gwyn Ciesla
> she/her/hers
>  
> in your fear, seek only peace 
> in your fear, seek only love
> -d. bowie
> 
> 
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

[Gwyn Ciesla via devel]

Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If you'd 
be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more of yours.

QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838
CalcMySky https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131842
indi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132014

And if you're feeling really generous, this unrelated review:

libchipcard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035958

Thanks in advance!

-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
 
in your fear, seek only peace 
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps for 3 nagios plugins

[Otto Liljalaakso]

2. lokakuuta 2022 22.30.02 GMT+03:00 Till Hofmann  
kirjoitti:
>I'm looking for reviews or review swaps for 3 nagios plugins:
>
>python-nagios-plugins-check_systemd
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886
>
>nagios-plugins-check_ssl_cert
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131602
>
>nagios-plugins-check_newest_file_age
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131603
>
>All those packages are trivial to review. I'd be happy to review 
>packages in exchange!

I can review these later today. I have the following simple CMake C++ library 
to swap:

iir1 - DSP IIR Realtime C++ filter library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129191

And another CMake C++ library, Loguru, coming up soon. I will ask you about 
when I get the review request up.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps for 3 nagios plugins

[Till Hofmann]

Hi all,

I'm looking for reviews or review swaps for 3 nagios plugins:

python-nagios-plugins-check_systemd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886

nagios-plugins-check_ssl_cert
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131602

nagios-plugins-check_newest_file_age
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131603

All those packages are trivial to review. I'd be happy to review 
packages in exchange!


Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Sympy 1.11 (review swaps)

[Jerry James]

On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 1:37 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> They're all done, except for this one:
>
> python-furo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121594
>
> It's a bit complicated, due to needing a pile of JavaScript at build
> time.  Who would like to swap reviews?  Give me a complicated one. :-)

I am still looking for a reviewer for python-furo.  Who needs a
review?  I'll swap you.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Sympy 1.11 (review swaps)

[Jerry James]

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 7:36 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> It is no longer possible to build the sympy documentation, due to
> missing dependencies.  However, I have already noted other packages I
> maintain that need each of these.  That tells me it is time to get
> them into Fedora.  I would like to swap reviews for the following:

They're all done, except for this one:

python-furo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121594

It's a bit complicated, due to needing a pile of JavaScript at build
time.  Who would like to swap reviews?  Give me a complicated one. :-)
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Sympy 1.11 (review swaps)

[Jerry James]

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 7:46 PM Jonathan Wright via devel
 wrote:
> I'll start on yours if you'll start on mine, I have a pile of my own :)

It's a deal.  I'll get started on yours.  Thank you!
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Sympy 1.11 (review swaps)

[Jonathan Wright via devel]

I'll start on yours if you'll start on mine, I have a pile of my own :)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW=Package%20Review=jonathan%40almalinux.org=1=equals_name=My%20review%20requests_id=12864886=Fedora_based_on=My%20review%20requests_format=advanced

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 8:38 PM Jerry James  wrote:

> I'm working on an update to sympy, to version 1.11.  This version has
> several backwards incompatible changes.  I inspected the consuming
> packages for use of the backwards incompatible APIs and found none.
> Just in case, I did local mock builds of each one, and the builds were
> all successful, including runs of their test suites.  The consuming
> packages are:
>
> - python-boutdata
> - python-brian2
> - python-fiat
> - python-nipy
> - python-pysb
> - python-trimesh
> - sagemath
>
> It is no longer possible to build the sympy documentation, due to
> missing dependencies.  However, I have already noted other packages I
> maintain that need each of these.  That tells me it is time to get
> them into Fedora.  I would like to swap reviews for the following:
>
> - python-sphinx-basic-ng:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121593
> - python-furo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121594,
> needs python-sphinx-basic-ng
> - python-uc-micro-py: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121595
> - python-linkify-it-py:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121596, needs
> python-uc-micro-py
> - python-sphinx-documatt-theme:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121597
> - python-sphinx-reredirects:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121598, needs
> python-sphinx-documatt-theme
>
> Let me know what I can review for you.
> --
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>


-- 
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Sympy 1.11 (review swaps)

[Jerry James]

I'm working on an update to sympy, to version 1.11.  This version has
several backwards incompatible changes.  I inspected the consuming
packages for use of the backwards incompatible APIs and found none.
Just in case, I did local mock builds of each one, and the builds were
all successful, including runs of their test suites.  The consuming
packages are:

- python-boutdata
- python-brian2
- python-fiat
- python-nipy
- python-pysb
- python-trimesh
- sagemath

It is no longer possible to build the sympy documentation, due to
missing dependencies.  However, I have already noted other packages I
maintain that need each of these.  That tells me it is time to get
them into Fedora.  I would like to swap reviews for the following:

- python-sphinx-basic-ng: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121593
- python-furo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121594,
needs python-sphinx-basic-ng
- python-uc-micro-py: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121595
- python-linkify-it-py:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121596, needs
python-uc-micro-py
- python-sphinx-documatt-theme:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121597
- python-sphinx-reredirects:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121598, needs
python-sphinx-documatt-theme

Let me know what I can review for you.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Review swaps

[Artur Frenszek-Iwicki]

Hey all, 

I have two packages which have been sitting in review for some time now:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095732
daniel-wikholm-segment16-fonts - collection of 3 font families.
Bit problematic because of missing license text, not having an official source 
website, nor a way to contact the author.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098373
gearhead2 - an RPG game, written in Pascal, using SDL1.2.
Fairly straight-forward. The prequel, gearhead1, is already in the repos, and 
the spec files are very similar.

If anyone could take a look at one of these, I'd be grateful.
I'm willing to review some C, C++, Pascal or shell stuff in return.

A.FI.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 3:31 AM Richard W.M. Jones  wrote:
> I took this one, it's a core package needed all over the place.

Thank you!

> > ocaml-ppx-import: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104693
>
> Do you know which other package(s) need this?

The latest version of frama-c needs it.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 08:43:43PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> I need 2 OCaml package reviews in order to update existing packages to
> the most recent versions.
> 
> ocaml-camlp-streams: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104283

I took this one, it's a core package needed all over the place.

> ocaml-ppx-import: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104693

Do you know which other package(s) need this?

Rich.

> I am willing to swap reviews.  (But note that I am vanishing in a puff
> of smoke on Saturday and will be largely incommunicado for about a
> week.)
> -- 
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

I need 2 OCaml package reviews in order to update existing packages to
the most recent versions.

ocaml-camlp-streams: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104283
ocaml-ppx-import: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104693

I am willing to swap reviews.  (But note that I am vanishing in a puff
of smoke on Saturday and will be largely incommunicado for about a
week.)
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Looking for 2 review swaps

[Robert-André Mauchin]

Hi,

I'm looking to get review of these two packages:

#2103380 NEW- nob...@fedoraproject.org - Review Request: rust-cradle - Execute child 
processes with ease https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103380


which depends on:

#2103367 NEW- nob...@fedoraproject.org - Review Request: rust-gag - Redirect, or 
hold stdout/stderr output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103367


Can do anything in exchange.

Best regards,

Robert-André
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Arthur Bols]

Hi,

I have 2 small python packages and 1 C/C++/Qt program, but it shouldn't 
be too much work.


btrfs-assistant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2093585
python-axolotl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2043231
python-axolotl-curve25519 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2043228


Let me know if you'd like to swap (or do some of them)!

Kind regards,
Arthur
fas: principis

On 3/06/2022 21:46, Mark E. Fuller wrote:

Dear all,

I'm looking to package task (https://taskfile.dev/) for Fedora and 
would like to offer to swap reviews:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2078117
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2078118
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2093467

All three spec files were generated automatically and the reviews 
should be trivial (at least I hope so).


Thanks all,
fuller

--
Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.
ful...@fedoraproject.org
ful...@stossrohr.net
@fuller:one.ems.host
https://www.stossrohr.net
PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps

[Mark E. Fuller]

Dear all,

I'm looking to package task (https://taskfile.dev/) for Fedora and would 
like to offer to swap reviews:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2078117
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2078118
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2093467

All three spec files were generated automatically and the reviews should 
be trivial (at least I hope so).


Thanks all,
fuller

--
Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.
ful...@fedoraproject.org
ful...@stossrohr.net
@fuller:one.ems.host
https://www.stossrohr.net
PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 5:04 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
 wrote:
> Taken all three.

Thank you!

> I have the following two python packages up for review:
> python-mrcfile - MRC2014 file format used in structural biology to store 
> image and volume data
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063369
>
> python-vcert - Automate key generation and certificate enrollment using 
> Venafi machine identity services
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072428
>
> I also have a golang package up for a rename review, if anyone is available:
> golang-github-jfrog-gofrog - Collection of Go utilities
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063191

I have taken all 3 of these.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Tuesday, 12 April 2022 at 21:54, Jerry James wrote:
> I need three new python packages to update python-pydata-sphinx-theme
> to its latest version.  Who would like to swap reviews?
> 
> python-pep621: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074647
> python-sphinx-autobuild (unretire):
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074651
> python-sphinx-theme-builder (depends on the previous two):
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074652

Taken all three.

I have the following two python packages up for review:
python-mrcfile - MRC2014 file format used in structural biology to store image 
and volume data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063369

python-vcert - Automate key generation and certificate enrollment using Venafi 
machine identity services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072428

I also have a golang package up for a rename review, if anyone is available:
golang-github-jfrog-gofrog - Collection of Go utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2063191

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://getfedora.org  |  RPM Fusion  http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

I need three new python packages to update python-pydata-sphinx-theme
to its latest version.  Who would like to swap reviews?

python-pep621: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074647
python-sphinx-autobuild (unretire):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074651
python-sphinx-theme-builder (depends on the previous two):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074652

-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Looking for some review swaps

[Major Hayden]

On 3/1/22 07:06, Ben Beasley wrote:
I’d like to find some reviewers to clear out my backlog of mostly-Python 
packages. These vary from near-trivial to moderately complicated.


I’m happy to review packages in exchange. I’m particularly comfortable 
with C, C++, and Python, but reviewing other kinds of packages is a 
possibility. It might be a few days before I have a chance to reciprocate.


I'll be happy to look at some of these today for you! I have several 
Google Cloud Python SDK components up for review but some might need to 
be updated to the latest version since they've been hanging out there 
for a while. Most of them are nearly identical.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012989
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012990
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012991
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012992
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012994
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012996

--
Major Hayden


OpenPGP_0x737051E0C1011FB1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Looking for some review swaps

[Ben Beasley]

I’d like to find some reviewers to clear out my backlog of mostly-Python 
packages. These vary from near-trivial to moderately complicated.


I’m happy to review packages in exchange. I’m particularly comfortable 
with C, C++, and Python, but reviewing other kinds of packages is a 
possibility. It might be a few days before I have a chance to reciprocate.


Thanks!

– Ben


Pure Python:

python-opentype-sanitizer: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049273 (for renaming 
python-ots to satisfy the PyPI parity policy)


python-autoprop: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038330

python-signature-dispatch: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038330


python-autoclasstoc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038159


Python with Cython:

python-asyncmy: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041221

python-ezdxf: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040816


C++:

c4log: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2040461 (for 
packaging rapidyaml)


casc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027121
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Dave Dykstra]

I would really appreciate a review for 'apptainer', just a name change
from 'singularity':
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034758

Dave


On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:47:10AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 8:34 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
>  wrote:
> > I've got this sad boy waiting for a review since September:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006685 
> > pasdoc - Documentation generator for Pascal source code
> >
> > I can review some C, C++, Pascal or shell stuff in return.
> 
> Since Arthur Bols is giving me some freebies (thank you, Arthur!), I
> will do the same for you.
> -- 
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/ 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ 
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines 
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 8:34 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
 wrote:
> I've got this sad boy waiting for a review since September:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006685
> pasdoc - Documentation generator for Pascal source code
>
> I can review some C, C++, Pascal or shell stuff in return.

Since Arthur Bols is giving me some freebies (thank you, Arthur!), I
will do the same for you.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Artur Frenszek-Iwicki]

I've got this sad boy waiting for a review since September:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006685
pasdoc - Documentation generator for Pascal source code

I can review some C, C++, Pascal or shell stuff in return.

A.FI.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Arthur Bols]

On 5/01/2022 05:04, Jerry James wrote:

On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 7:46 PM Jerry James  wrote:

Happy New Year!

I am in need of some package reviews to update parts of the OCaml stack:

- ocaml-bos: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031160
- ocaml-odoc-parser: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036395
- ocaml-mdx: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036396
- ocaml-stdcompat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036398
- ocaml-pyml: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036399

Let me know what I can review for you.  Regards,

I am still in need of these reviews.  If you don't need a package
reviewed, I am willing to swap for something else.  Let me know what I
can do for you.

Happy new year to you too!

It's been a bit quiet over the holidays, so I'll take the reviews.

I currently don't need any help, if someone else is in desperate need of 
a review (and maybe didn't have time to do yours), maybe you could help 
them!


Arthur
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 7:46 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> Happy New Year!
>
> I am in need of some package reviews to update parts of the OCaml stack:
>
> - ocaml-bos: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031160
> - ocaml-odoc-parser: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036395
> - ocaml-mdx: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036396
> - ocaml-stdcompat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036398
> - ocaml-pyml: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036399
>
> Let me know what I can review for you.  Regards,

I am still in need of these reviews.  If you don't need a package
reviewed, I am willing to swap for something else.  Let me know what I
can do for you.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

Happy New Year!

I am in need of some package reviews to update parts of the OCaml stack:

- ocaml-bos: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031160
- ocaml-odoc-parser: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036395
- ocaml-mdx: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036396
- ocaml-stdcompat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036398
- ocaml-pyml: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036399

Let me know what I can review for you.  Regards,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

Hello all,

The odoc (OCaml documentation) project has started releasing its
version 2.x series.  They come with a small tree of new dependencies.
Here are the first few.  I am willing to swap for reviews of these
packages.  Let me know what I can review for you.

ocaml-logs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2029560
ocaml-rresult: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2031159
ocaml-bos: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2031160
ocaml-version: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2031161

Regards,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps for git-lfs/go-minify deps

[Sandro Mani]

Hi

I can take these.

I'd have a bunch of mingw-qt6-* packages up for review, all straight 
forward:


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009214 - 
mingw-qt6-qtlocation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009215 - 
mingw-qt6-qtsensors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009217 - 
mingw-qt6-qtserialport
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009221 - 
mingw-qt6-qtshadertools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009223 - 
mingw-qt6-qtwebsockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009268 - 
mingw-qt6-qtmultimedia (depends on mingw-qt6-qtshadertools)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009269 - 
mingw-qt6-qtwebchannel (depends on mingw-qt6-qtwebsockets)


Thanks
Sandro

On 29.09.21 23:31, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:

Hello,

I haven't done a review in a while, and since I need some new reviews, 
I thought I'd see if anyone wanted to swap.


The latest git-lfs requires 2 new dependencies:

- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2007909 golang-github-git-lfs-pktline - 
Git pkt-line Toolkit
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2007920 
golang-github-git-lfs-wildmatch-2 - Pattern matching language for 
filepaths compatible with Git


The latest go-minify requires 1 new dependency:

- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2003415 golang-github-djherbis-atime - 
Access Times for files


I can review C, Go, Python, R packages in return.

--
Elliott

___
devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of 
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List 
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report 
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps for git-lfs/go-minify deps

[Elliott Sales de Andrade]

Hello,

I haven't done a review in a while, and since I need some new reviews, I
thought I'd see if anyone wanted to swap.

The latest git-lfs requires 2 new dependencies:

- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2007909 golang-github-git-lfs-pktline - Git
pkt-line Toolkit
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2007920 golang-github-git-lfs-wildmatch-2 -
Pattern matching language for filepaths compatible with Git

The latest go-minify requires 1 new dependency:

- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2003415 golang-github-djherbis-atime - Access
Times for files

I can review C, Go, Python, R packages in return.

--
Elliott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps: python-keyrings-alt and python-annexremote

[Ankur Sinha]

On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 10:13:39 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> 
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001684

This one remains to be reviewed, any one for a swap please? :)

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps: python-keyrings-alt and python-annexremote

[Ankur Sinha]

Hi folks,

I'd like to get these two Python modules reviewed please. Would anyone
like to swap reviews?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001678
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001684

They're required to package datalad, which is required for
spikeextractors---both on the Neuro SIG's package queue.

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:16 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> Who would like to swap package reviews?  I need these 6:
>
> fontawesome5-fonts
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1989300
> This one has been mentioned previously on this mailing list.  It is
> blocking the review of python-pydata-sphinx-theme, which is needed to
> update python-networkx.

Many thanks to Ben Beasley, who reviewed all of the other packages.  I
still need a reviewer for this one.  Who is up for a font package
review?  I'll do something for you in return.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

Hi all,

Who would like to swap package reviews?  I need these 6:

fontawesome5-fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1989300
This one has been mentioned previously on this mailing list.  It is
blocking the review of python-pydata-sphinx-theme, which is needed to
update python-networkx.

flintqs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1992877
Currently bundled with sagemath, but useful in its own right.

gp2c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1992878
A PARI/GP script to C converter, needed by sagemath.

pari-nflistdata
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1992879
Data tables for PARI, needed by sagemath.

pari-nflistdata
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1992880
More data tables for PARI, needed by sagemath.

python-pari-jupyter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1992881
A Jupyter kernel for PARI/GP, needed by sagemath.

Regards,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 5:02 PM Jerry James  wrote:
> python-pydata-sphinx-theme:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981997, requires
> python-jupyter-sphinx and python-pytest-regressions

This is the last review I need for the python-networkx update.  I'm
willing to swap reviews or other technical favors.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps: A bunch of PHP libraries

[Remi Collet]

Le 16/07/2021 à 10:39, Christopher Engelhard a écrit :

Hi all,
I finally found some time to unbundle all the 3rdparty PHP/composer
libraries from the nextcloud package.

The bad news is that due to their various dependency trees, I now have a
total of 24 new packages that need reviewing.
The good news is that I think quite a few of them will be generally
useful beyond just nextcloud.

They are all fairly small & simple PHP libraries, build without issues
and are basically identical in terms of packaging. If there are people
out there who'd like to try their hand at reviewing for the first time,
one of these might be a good place to start.


From a quick look, for all these packages
it seems useful to include upstream test suite
by pulling a git snapshot (common practice in PHP to workaround
the stupid .gitattributes usage)

Unbundling make sense when we can run CI (Koschei) and ensure
changes in the PHP stack (ex PHP 8.0 in F35 or 8.1 in F36) don't break

Also use range dependencies everywhere (even if a single version 
packaged), this can change in the future.


I should be able to review (or help) on this set of reviews.

the PHP SIG mailing list (php-devel@...) is probably a better
place if you have any question about PHP specific packaging


Remi



Obviously, if you need something reviewed in return, I'd be happy to do
that.

Full list of links is below, but to make it easier for people
- I set up a dependency tree (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1981857_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12016550
) so you can pick a leaf.
- I made a copr repository (
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lcts/nextcloud/packages/ ) that
has builds for all of these, including fedora-review/rpmlint logs (and a
big thank you to whoever made that last bit possible in Copr, that was
*extremely* useful). The repo also contains a few forks of existing
packages, ignore those :) .

Best,
Christopher

List of links:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982616
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982618
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982619
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982621
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982624
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982627
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982629
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982630
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982631
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982632
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982633
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982635
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982636
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982637
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982638
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982639
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982640
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982643
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982645
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982646
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982647
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982648
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982651
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982652





___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps: A bunch of PHP libraries

[Christopher Engelhard]

On 2021-07-19 11:58, Tomas Korbar wrote:

Hi guys,

I will review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982618
and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982621


Thanks. Note that php-giggsey-libphonenumber-for-php requires 
php-giggsey-locale, which is also not in the repos yet.



For exchange could you Christopher please review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983601 ?


Sure.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps: A bunch of PHP libraries

[Tomas Korbar]

Hi guys,
I will review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982618
and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982621
For exchange could you Christopher please review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983601 ?


On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 8:40 PM Christopher Engelhard  wrote:

> On 18.07.21 16:06, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> > mt32emu - C/C++ library for emulating Roland MT-32, CM-32L and LAPC-I
> > synthesizer modules
> > A cmake project that is somewhat complicated by the fact that it comes
> > from a monorepo that also contains other related projects.
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980482
> >
> > rubygem-sync - A module that provides a two-phase lock with a counter
> > Ruby library whose specfile was automatically generated with gem2rpm,
> > only small adjustements were needed on top of that.
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978395
>
> Sure, I'd be happy to. And thanks.
>
> Christopher
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps: A bunch of PHP libraries

[Christopher Engelhard]

On 18.07.21 16:06, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> mt32emu - C/C++ library for emulating Roland MT-32, CM-32L and LAPC-I
> synthesizer modules
> A cmake project that is somewhat complicated by the fact that it comes
> from a monorepo that also contains other related projects.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980482
> 
> rubygem-sync - A module that provides a two-phase lock with a counter
> Ruby library whose specfile was automatically generated with gem2rpm,
> only small adjustements were needed on top of that.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978395

Sure, I'd be happy to. And thanks.

Christopher
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps: A bunch of PHP libraries

[Otto Urpelainen]

Christopher Engelhard kirjoitti 16.7.2021 klo 11.39:

Hi all,
I finally found some time to unbundle all the 3rdparty PHP/composer
libraries from the nextcloud package.

The bad news is that due to their various dependency trees, I now have a
total of 24 new packages that need reviewing.
The good news is that I think quite a few of them will be generally
useful beyond just nextcloud.

They are all fairly small & simple PHP libraries, build without issues
and are basically identical in terms of packaging. If there are people
out there who'd like to try their hand at reviewing for the first time,
one of these might be a good place to start.

Obviously, if you need something reviewed in return, I'd be happy to do
that.

Full list of links is below, but to make it easier for people
- I set up a dependency tree (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1981857_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12016550
) so you can pick a leaf.
- I made a copr repository (
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lcts/nextcloud/packages/ ) that
has builds for all of these, including fedora-review/rpmlint logs (and a
big thank you to whoever made that last bit possible in Copr, that was
*extremely* useful). The repo also contains a few forks of existing
packages, ignore those :) .


I will review at least some of these, depending on how much time I find. 
I will flag anything I have ongoing as appropriate, so others are free 
to take any that have not been flagged.


In exchange, you could take a look at either or both of these that I 
have waiting for a reviewer:


mt32emu - C/C++ library for emulating Roland MT-32, CM-32L and LAPC-I 
synthesizer modules
A cmake project that is somewhat complicated by the fact that it comes 
from a monorepo that also contains other related projects.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980482

rubygem-sync - A module that provides a two-phase lock with a counter
Ruby library whose specfile was automatically generated with gem2rpm, 
only small adjustements were needed on top of that.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978395

Otto
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps: A bunch of PHP libraries

[Christopher Engelhard]

Hi all,
I finally found some time to unbundle all the 3rdparty PHP/composer 
libraries from the nextcloud package.

The bad news is that due to their various dependency trees, I now have a 
total of 24 new packages that need reviewing.
The good news is that I think quite a few of them will be generally 
useful beyond just nextcloud.

They are all fairly small & simple PHP libraries, build without issues 
and are basically identical in terms of packaging. If there are people 
out there who'd like to try their hand at reviewing for the first time, 
one of these might be a good place to start.

Obviously, if you need something reviewed in return, I'd be happy to do 
that.

Full list of links is below, but to make it easier for people
- I set up a dependency tree ( 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1981857_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12016550
 
) so you can pick a leaf.
- I made a copr repository ( 
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lcts/nextcloud/packages/ ) that 
has builds for all of these, including fedora-review/rpmlint logs (and a 
big thank you to whoever made that last bit possible in Copr, that was 
*extremely* useful). The repo also contains a few forks of existing 
packages, ignore those :) .

Best,
Christopher

List of links:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982616
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982618
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982619
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982621
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982624
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982627
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982629
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982630
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982631
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982632
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982633
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982635
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982636
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982637
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982638
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982639
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982640
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982643
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982645
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982646
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982647
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982648
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982651
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982652





___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 3:40 AM Karolina Surma  wrote:
> I've taken python-pytest-datadir and python-pytest-regressions which I
> started to work on independently.

Thank you!  Let me know if I can do anything for you.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Karolina Surma]

Hey Jerry,

I've taken python-pytest-datadir and python-pytest-regressions which I 
started to work on independently.


Cheers,

Karolina


On 7/14/21 1:02 AM, Jerry James wrote:

A new version of python-networkx is out.  In order to keep building
documentation for it, the following new packages are needed.  I am
willing to swap reviews, or help out with fixing a bug in exchange for
a review.

python-bash-kernel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981993

python-jupyter-sphinx:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981994, requires
python-bash-kernel

python-pytest-datadir: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981995

python-pytest-regressions:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981996, requires
python-pytest-datadir

python-pydata-sphinx-theme:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981997, requires
python-jupyter-sphinx and python-pytest-regressions


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

A new version of python-networkx is out.  In order to keep building
documentation for it, the following new packages are needed.  I am
willing to swap reviews, or help out with fixing a bug in exchange for
a review.

python-bash-kernel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981993

python-jupyter-sphinx:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981994, requires
python-bash-kernel

python-pytest-datadir: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981995

python-pytest-regressions:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981996, requires
python-pytest-datadir

python-pydata-sphinx-theme:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981997, requires
python-jupyter-sphinx and python-pytest-regressions

-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps: python-ppft and python-pox

[Ankur Sinha]

Hi folks,

I have a few new simple dependencies that require review. These are
required to update the python-SALib package.

Would anyone like to swap reviews please?

- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980415
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980142

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Jerry James]

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 6:46 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
 wrote:
> I'll take them. Apart from ocaml-atd I will have more ocaml
> dependencies for infer soon.

Thank you, Michel.  I'm happy to review those when you have them ready.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 15:49 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have mentioned previously on this list that I want to update
> ocaml-ocamlgraph to version 2.0.0.  It has two consumers in Fedora:
> frama-c (which is ready to move to the new version) and ocaml-dose3
> (which is not).
> 
> There is a new upstream location for ocaml-dose3:
> https://gitlab.com/irill/dose3.  That has a version which is ready
> for
> ocaml-ocamlgraph 2.0.0, but it needs two packages not currently
> available in Fedora:
> 
> ocaml-camlbz2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950554
> ocaml-parmap: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950555
> 
I'll take them. Apart from ocaml-atd I will have more ocaml
dependencies for infer soon.

Best regards,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

Hi all,

I have mentioned previously on this list that I want to update
ocaml-ocamlgraph to version 2.0.0.  It has two consumers in Fedora:
frama-c (which is ready to move to the new version) and ocaml-dose3
(which is not).

There is a new upstream location for ocaml-dose3:
https://gitlab.com/irill/dose3.  That has a version which is ready for
ocaml-ocamlgraph 2.0.0, but it needs two packages not currently
available in Fedora:

ocaml-camlbz2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950554
ocaml-parmap: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1950555

Who would like to swap reviews?
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Review swaps

[Mattia Verga via devel]

Il 17/03/21 16:51, Robert-André Mauchin ha scritto:
> Hello!
>
> I have a dozen or more packages waiting to be reviewed and I'm looking for 
> someone to
> help in exchange of some of yours.
>
I'll try to work on some of them in the weekend, I already own you a
couple of reviews, at least.

BTW, I approved golang-github-gl some days ago.

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Review swaps

[Robert-André Mauchin]

Hello!

I have a dozen or more packages waiting to be reviewed and I'm looking for 
someone to
help in exchange of some of yours.

Silver is cross-shell customizable powerline-like prompt heavily inspired by 
Agnoster.
It needs to be updated to 2.0.0.

- [ ] rust-silver update

  - [ ] rust-confy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=rust-confy

  - [ ] rust-humantime-serde
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=rust-humantime-serde


wormhole-william is a Go (golang) implementation of magic wormhole. It provides
secure end-to-end encrypted file transfers between computers. The endpoints are
connected using the same "wormhole code".

- [ ] wormhole-william
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=wormhole-william

  - [x] golang-github-cheggaaa-pb-3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1910860

  - [ ] golang-salsa-debian-vasudev-gospake2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=golang-salsa-debian-vasudev-gospake2


Wormhole-gui is a cross-platform graphical interface for magic-wormhole that
lets you easily share files, folders and text between devices. It uses the Go
implementation of magic-wormhole, called wormhole-william, and compiles
statically into a single binary. Wormhole-gui is compatible with the cli
applications from both wormhole-william and magic-wormhole.

- [ ] wormhole-gui
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=wormhole-gui

  - [ ] golang-fyne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=golang-fyne

- [ ] golang-github-kodeworks-image-ico
  
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=golang-github-kodeworks-image-ico

- [ ] golang-github-fyne-io-mobile
  
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=golang-github-fyne-io-mobile

- [ ] golang-github-gl
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=golang-github-gl

- [ ] golang-github-fyne-io-glfw
  
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=golang-github-fyne-io-glfw

- [ ] golang-github-goki-freetype
  
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=golang-github-goki-freetype

- [ ] golang-github-jackmordaunt-icns
  
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=golang-github-jackmordaunt-icns

- [ ] golang-github-josephspurrier-goversioninfo
  
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=golang-github-josephspurrier-goversionin

  - [ ] golang-github-akavel-rsrc

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=golang-github-akavel-rsrc

- [ ] golang-github-lucor-goinfo
  
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=golang-github-lucor-goinfo

- [ ] golang-github-srwiley-oksvg
  
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=golang-github-srwiley-oksvg

  - [ ] golang-github-srwiley-rasterx

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=golang-github-srwiley-rasterx

Thanks to all for taking a look,

Robert-André
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

NeuroFedora review swaps: python-pynn and compneuro container image

[Ankur Sinha]

Hi everyone,

I'd like to get these two tickets reviewed:

- 1150105 – (python-pynn) Review Request: python-pynn -
  Simulator-independent specification of neuronal network models
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150105

- 1913491 – Container Review Request - compneuro - The CompNeuro
  container image includes commonly used neuron modelling and simulation
  tools
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1913491

The second one is for our self contained change:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Comp_Neuro_Container

Would anyone like to swap reviews please?

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Review swaps

[Jerry James]

I need a handful of package reviews to finish reviving the scala package:

jline2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908038
This is a re-review, as we have had a jline2 package before.  This is
basically just the existing jline spec file with a new name, so that
the jline package can move on to version 3.x.

java-diff-utils: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908039

jol: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908040

material-icon-fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908042

I'm happy to review in exchange.  Thank you,
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Rust library and binary review swaps

[Ed Neville]

Hello,

I'm new here. Would anyone like to do a review swap for the following, 
please?

  

  

  

  

The first three are dependencies for rust-pleaser. Not wanting to put 
words in somebody's mouth, the set was looked at by decathorpe on 
freenode/#fedora-rust, so should be at a good point.

I'll review simple packages in return as best I can :)

-- 
Best regards,
Ed http://www.s5h.net/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swaps and advice for python / fortran / octave modules

[Orion Poplawski]

On 11/6/20 2:09 AM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:

Hello all,

I have a couple of new review tickets for which I may need some advice
from experts of Python / Fortran / Octave modules:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893539 (calceph)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895290 (python-calcephpy)

Ideally, the python module could be built from the calceph package, but
upstream developer told me that the build from make is deprecated, so I
created the python-calcephpy package that builds from Pypi sources.This
is my first python related package and it also uses Cython to produce
architecture dependent modules, so I hope to not have made mistakes.

The main package (calceph) also carries a Fortran interface, for which
provides a .mod file in the includes directory. I'm not expert of
Fortran neither, so I assumed that the fortran interface doesn't require
the C shared libraries. (?)


No, the .mod file really is more like a compiled header file, so you 
still need the library.  It should be installed into %{_fmoddir} and go 
into the -devel sub-package.


https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Fortran/


That package could also build an Octave module: in fact, the build
process puts some sources in %{buildroot}%{_libexecdir} that I currently
remove, since I have no idea if they're useful or if they need to be
compiled... I do not plan to use this module, so if things get
complicated I would just drop this sources.


This might help you:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Octave/

though it is geared towards pure octave module packages.  You could also 
look at plplot as an example of something that builds an octave package 
as part of a larger package with other APIs.



Aside from these questions, I'm open to swap reviews to speed up the
process.

Thanks
Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org




--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems  720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Review swaps and advice for python / fortran / octave modules

[Mattia Verga via devel]

Hello all,

I have a couple of new review tickets for which I may need some advice 
from experts of Python / Fortran / Octave modules:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893539 (calceph)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895290 (python-calcephpy)

Ideally, the python module could be built from the calceph package, but 
upstream developer told me that the build from make is deprecated, so I 
created the python-calcephpy package that builds from Pypi sources.This 
is my first python related package and it also uses Cython to produce 
architecture dependent modules, so I hope to not have made mistakes.

The main package (calceph) also carries a Fortran interface, for which 
provides a .mod file in the includes directory. I'm not expert of 
Fortran neither, so I assumed that the fortran interface doesn't require 
the C shared libraries. (?)

That package could also build an Octave module: in fact, the build 
process puts some sources in %{buildroot}%{_libexecdir} that I currently 
remove, since I have no idea if they're useful or if they need to be 
compiled... I do not plan to use this module, so if things get 
complicated I would just drop this sources.

Aside from these questions, I'm open to swap reviews to speed up the 
process.

Thanks
Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Easy Review Swaps For New Packages That Block Rust Stack Updates

[Jared K. Smith]

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 5:59 AM Fabio Valentini 
wrote:

> I've been working through open bugs in the Rust stack for the past
> week, trying to contribute a few package updates. Some are, however,
> blocked by new dependencies that aren't packaged yet.
>
> These new packages are *very simple* and 99% automatically generated,
> so the reviews should be easy. Below is a numbered list of packages
> that are for review, which package updates they block, and how they
> depend on each other.
>

I've reviewed the bottom three or four, and will continue to work my way up
from the bottom as time permits today.


> I'll gladly review *simple* packages in return :)
>

I don't have any to exchange right now, but thanks for offering.

-Jared
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Easy Review Swaps For New Packages That Block Rust Stack Updates

[Fabio Valentini]

Hi everybody,

I've been working through open bugs in the Rust stack for the past
week, trying to contribute a few package updates. Some are, however,
blocked by new dependencies that aren't packaged yet.

These new packages are *very simple* and 99% automatically generated,
so the reviews should be easy. Below is a numbered list of packages
that are for review, which package updates they block, and how they
depend on each other.

1. rust-peg-runtime: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879207
blocks 2. and rust-peg 0.6.3 update
2. rust-peg-macros: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879209
blocks rust-peg 0.6.3 update
blocks rust-varlink_parser 4.0.4 update

3. rust-quick-xml: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879692
blocks rust-feed-rs 0.4.0 update

4. rust-pure-rust-locales: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879716
blocks rust-chrono 0.4.15 update

5. rust-const_fn: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879888
blocks rust-time 0.2.21 update

6. rust-rusttype: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880718
blocks 13
7. rust-palette_derive: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880719
blocks 8
8. rust-palette: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880720
blocks 13
9. rust-pathfinder_simd: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880722
blocks 10, 12
10. rust-pathfinder_geometry:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880724
blocks 12
11. rust-freetype: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880727
blocks 12
12. rust-font-kit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880728
blocks 13
13. rust-plotters: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880729
blocks rust-criterion 0.3.3 update

14. rust-httpdate: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880800
blocks rust-hyper 0.13.8 update

15. rust-cedarwood: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880840
blocks 16
16. rust-jieba-rs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880841
blocks rust-elasticlunr-rs 2.3.9 update

17. rust-buf-min: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881231
blocks rust-v_escape 0.12.1 update

18. rust-binfarce: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881978
blocks rust-cargo-bloat 0.10.0 update

19. rust-spinning_top: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881987
blocks rust-flume 0.9.0 update

I'll gladly review *simple* packages in return :)

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org