On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:05 PM Jared K. Smith wrote:
> I went ahead and grabbed the two remaining ones.
Thank you very much, Jared. I appreciate you taking time to help me
out. Let me know if I can do something for you.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 10:23 AM Jerry James wrote:
> Many thanks to Jared Smith, Fabio Valentini, and Ankur Sinha for doing
> the first 10 reviews on this list. I appreciate the time all of you
put into those reviews. I've still got two to go. Who would like to
> swap?
>
> 11.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:10 PM Jerry James wrote:
> Thanks to Jared, #1 and #2 are done. Who has packages sitting in the
> review queue? You scratch my back and I'll scratch yours ... from 6
> feet away while wearing masks, of course. Here is the rest of what I
> need:
Many thanks to Jared
On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 1:44 PM Jerry James wrote:
> Hello everybody. The latest version of ocaml-ppx-inline-test requires
> ocaml-time-now, which we do not currently have in Fedora. That
> package is at the terminus of a small tree of dependencies we don't
> have. I would like to swap reviews
Hello everybody. The latest version of ocaml-ppx-inline-test requires
ocaml-time-now, which we do not currently have in Fedora. That
package is at the terminus of a small tree of dependencies we don't
have. I would like to swap reviews for the following. Please let me
know what I can review
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 9:16 AM Qiyu Yan wrote:
> This works, but due to the mass rebuild and the mirrors available for
> me didn't get synced. Preparing the buildroot will take unreasonable
> long time here, maybe letting others interested to continue.
Sure, thank you for the antic review, Qiyu.
Robert-André Mauchin 于2020年8月2日周日 上午1:47写道：
>
> On Saturday, 1 August 2020 05:07:52 CEST Qiyu Yan wrote:
> > Jerry James 于 2020年8月1日周六 上午5:24写道：
> >
> > > I need two packages reviewed to enable some optional functionality in
> > > the normaliz package. The second depends on the first:
> > >
> >
On Saturday, 1 August 2020 05:07:52 CEST Qiyu Yan wrote:
> Jerry James 于 2020年8月1日周六 上午5:24写道：
>
> > I need two packages reviewed to enable some optional functionality in
> > the normaliz package. The second depends on the first:
> >
> > antic:
Jerry James 于 2020年8月1日周六 上午5:24写道：
> I need two packages reviewed to enable some optional functionality in
> the normaliz package. The second depends on the first:
>
> antic: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862615
Done for this.
>
> e-antic:
I need two packages reviewed to enable some optional functionality in
the normaliz package. The second depends on the first:
antic: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862615
e-antic: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862616
Let me know what I can review for you in exchange.
Hi all,
I know I unretired non-daw, but the Linux Audio community has developed
a drop-in replacement for non-session-manager as a fork called
new-session-manager. I've packaged it for both Ubuntu and now Fedora.
If anybody would be so kind as to review this package, the bug is at
I took it.
вт, 30 июн. 2020 г. в 06:28, Chenxiong Qi :
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Could anyone please review these three packages?
>
> python-django-uuslug
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851463
>
> python-django-contrib-comments
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851562
>
Hello everyone,
Could anyone please review these three packages?
python-django-uuslug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851463
python-django-contrib-comments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851562
This is not a new package. It has been retired more than 8 weeks ago.
CVC 1.8 is out, and it has a new dependency.
kissat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850262
utop 2.6.0 is out and brings ocaml 4.11 compatibility with it, so
we'll need this version soon. It has a new dependency, which has a
new dependency, which has a new dependency:
ocaml-trie:
Hi all,
I have these 2 packages that are probably almost OK.
They were reviewed and should be probably good now.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811777
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811774
Would anyone give me a hand?
They are important for having puppet and
Who would like to swap reviews? I need the following:
ocaml-fieldslib: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
ocaml-variantslib: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833471
ocaml-ppx-inline-test: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833474
ocaml-ppx-compare:
El jue., 7 may. 2020 a las 18:04, Ian McInerney ()
escribió:
> I'll swap my git-revise (
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830306) package for
> python-ovirt-engine-sdk4. And if no one else needs a swap I could also take
> sqm-scripts.
>
> I will hopefully do the review in the next
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 4:03 PM Juan Orti Alcaine
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for these packages to be reviewed. Anyone interested in some
> reviews in exchange?
>
> python-ovirt-engine-sdk4 - Python SDK for version 4 of the oVirt Engine API
>
Hello,
I'm looking for these packages to be reviewed. Anyone interested in some
reviews in exchange?
python-ovirt-engine-sdk4 - Python SDK for version 4 of the oVirt Engine API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832979
sqm-scripts - Traffic shaper scripts of the CeroWrt project
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 9:01 AM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I can review these. Would you be able to review these two if you have
> some time please?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827957
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828079
Will do. Thank you, Ankur!
--
Jerry James
Hi Jerry,
On Tue, May 05, 2020 15:16:03 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> The latest version of gap-pkg-semigroups has two new dependencies.
> Who would like to swap reviews? I need these two:
>
> gap-pkg-ferret: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830322
> gap-pkg-images:
The latest version of gap-pkg-semigroups has two new dependencies.
Who would like to swap reviews? I need these two:
gap-pkg-ferret: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830322
gap-pkg-images: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830323
The latter depends on the former. Thanks,
Hello,
I managed to package another two tools on the NeuroFedora list over the
weekend:
- python-sciunit: A Test-Driven Framework for Formally Validating
Scientific Models Against Data
- jneuroml-core: The NeuroML 2 Schema and ComponentType definitions in
LEMS
Would someone like to swap
Hi,
anyone up for review swaps? I'm updating clojure and
it requires two new dependencies, here are the review requests:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821025
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821026
Best wishes,
Markku
Great, thanks, I'll take yours!
El jue., 20 feb. 2020 4:01, Jerry James escribió:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:17 PM Iñaki Ucar
> wrote:
> > I managed to solve the issue with the Java stack size for the s390x
> > builder. The new koji scratch build succeeded, and now the review
> > should be
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:17 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> I managed to solve the issue with the Java stack size for the s390x
> builder. The new koji scratch build succeeded, and now the review
> should be quick and easy:
That's great! I will take the review. If an OCaml review is okay,
would you
I managed to solve the issue with the Java stack size for the s390x
builder. The new koji scratch build succeeded, and now the review
should be quick and easy:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803528
Iñaki
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 20:23, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 08:39, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 01:11, Jerry James wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 10:06 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > > If anyone is interested in pushing this forward, I can review
> > > something in exchange. Note that the koji scratch build fails
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 01:11, Jerry James wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 10:06 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > If anyone is interested in pushing this forward, I can review
> > something in exchange. Note that the koji scratch build fails on s390x
> > due to a Java stack overflow. Does anyone know
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 10:06 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> If anyone is interested in pushing this forward, I can review
> something in exchange. Note that the koji scratch build fails on s390x
> due to a Java stack overflow. Does anyone know what's the default in
> that arch and how to increase it?
Hi all,
There were some efforts to package RStudio in the past [1], but
they're all dead. So following recent work by Dan Čermák for openSUSE
[2], I adapted it for Fedora and submitted it for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803528
If anyone is interested in pushing this
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 1:40 PM Jerry James wrote:
> It turns out that, in addition to the above, I need 3 other packages
> to update Frama-C properly, which means I need to swap six reviews in
> all.
Let's try this again. I managed to forget one (I really need seven
reviews), and two have been
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 13:40:31 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 8:16 PM Jerry James wrote:
> > The latest release of Frama-C needs ocaml-ppx-deriving, which in turn
> > needs two other packages we don't have in Fedora. I'm willing to swap
> > reviews for the following:
> >
>
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 8:16 PM Jerry James wrote:
> The latest release of Frama-C needs ocaml-ppx-deriving, which in turn
> needs two other packages we don't have in Fedora. I'm willing to swap
> reviews for the following:
>
> ocaml-ppxfind:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798796
Hello there
I will be happy to take these reviews (since they seem to be very easy :P).
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 5:36 PM Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Updating python-pingouin to the latest version requires python-outdated,
> which requires python-littleutils.
>
> Would anyone like to swap
Hello,
Updating python-pingouin to the latest version requires python-outdated,
which requires python-littleutils.
Would anyone like to swap reviews please?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798944
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798940
These are trivial python
The latest release of Frama-C needs ocaml-ppx-deriving, which in turn
needs two other packages we don't have in Fedora. I'm willing to swap
reviews for the following:
ocaml-ppxfind:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798796
ocaml-ppx-tools:
Thanks a lot, Ankur!
I will follow up in the BZ itself.
Jirka
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:44 PM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 01:18:48 +0100, Jiri Hladky wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Jirka,
>
> > I have a simple package for review. It's called practrand - a Software
> package
> > for the
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 01:18:48 +0100, Jiri Hladky wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Jirka,
> I have a simple package for review. It's called practrand - a Software package
> for the Randon number generation & testing
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795461
I see that it hasn't been taken up for
Hi Fabio,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:42 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> I'll take a look at your review requests. I've been steeping in Java
> packaging for so long that I might as well do it ;)
Thank you! I'm glad to have your expert eye take a look.
> I'll have some simple packages for you to
Hi,
I have a simple package for review. It's called practrand - a Software
package for the Randon number generation & testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795461
I offer to review some simple package in return.
Thanks!
Jirka
___
devel
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 05:44 Jerry James wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The antlr4 package needs a reboot so that it can ship the various
> language runtime libraries, and so that it can be updated to the
> latest version. I have been in contact with the maintainers of the
> current antlr4 package and
Greetings,
The antlr4 package needs a reboot so that it can ship the various
language runtime libraries, and so that it can be updated to the
latest version. I have been in contact with the maintainers of the
current antlr4 package and have received approval to proceed with
this.
I would like
On Sunday, 12 January 2020 06:40:41 CET Jerry James wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> Dan Čermák and I have been talking about getting Facebook's Infer tool
> into Fedora. Infer is a static code analyzer for C, C#, C++, and
> Java. I've put together package reviews for a batch of dependencies.
> The
Greetings all,
Dan Čermák and I have been talking about getting Facebook's Infer tool
into Fedora. Infer is a static code analyzer for C, C#, C++, and
Java. I've put together package reviews for a batch of dependencies.
The point of all of these is to get the documentation building tool
odoc
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 3:47 PM Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> Can somebody help me with some reviews, the first two
>
> being more urgent than others. I can swap with anything
>
> in exchange.
>
I've reviewed the first two. I'll try to get to the others over the next
day or two.
Hello,
Can somebody help me with some reviews, the first two
being more urgent than others. I can swap with anything
in exchange.
Happy holidays,
Robert-André
1786858[1]
_Review Request: golang-rsc-binaryregexp - Go regexp for binary/latin-1 data _
1786857[2]
_Review Request:
Hello,
I have a bunch of Rust package to review, would you please give some help in
exchange
of swaps?
1763433[1]
_Review Request: rust-chunked_transfer - Encoder and decoder for HTTP chunked
transfer coding (RFC 7230 § 4 _
2019-12-07 21:27:57 UTC
1763459[2]
_Review Request:
Awhile back, polymake upstream started shipping two new components in
the polymake tarball: JuPyMake (a python interface to polymake) and
jupyter-polymake (a Jupyter kernel for polymake). Even though they
are all shipped in the same tarball, they have different version
numbers. This has made the
Hello,
Two more NeuroFedora packages need review if anyone would like to swap
reviews please?
- 1150441 – Review Request: iv - InterViews graphical library:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150441
- 1770582 – (jLEMS) Review Request: jLEMS - Java Interpreter for the Low
Entropy
Hello,
I'd like some help to review a handful of Rust packages:
1763459[1]
_Review Request: rust-multipart - Backend-agnostic extension for HTTP libraries_
1763457[2]
_Review Request: rust-nickel - Express _
1763448[3]
_Review Request: rust-mustache - Rust implementation of Mustache _
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 19:27:31 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like some help to review a handful of Golang packages:
Missed this e-mail. Sorry Robert! I'm happy to help with Golang reviews
too. Are there any more reviews pending?
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha
On Saturday, 27 July 2019 01:59:11 CEST Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 2:26 PM Robert-André Mauchin
>
> wrote:
> > Review Request: wgctrl - Control of WireGuard interfaces on multiple
> > platforms
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1730911
>
> Done.
>
> > Review
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 2:26 PM Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
> Review Request: wgctrl - Control of WireGuard interfaces on multiple
> platforms
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1730911
>
Done.
> Review Request: golang-github-mattn-ieproxy - Detect the proxy settings on
> Windows
Hello,
I'd like some help to review a handful of Golang packages:
Review Request: wgctrl - Control of WireGuard interfaces on multiple platforms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1730911
Review Request: golang-github-mattn-ieproxy - Detect the proxy settings on
Windows platform
On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 20:49:29 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On Saturday, 20 July 2019 18:01:54 CEST Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Two more deps require review. Swaps welcome again :)
> >
> > - python-airspeed: https://bugzilla.r
On Saturday, 20 July 2019 18:01:54 CEST Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Two more deps require review. Swaps welcome again :)
>
> - python-airspeed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731648
> - python-pyelectro: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
Hello everyone,
Two more deps require review. Swaps welcome again :)
- python-airspeed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731648
- python-pyelectro: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731657
These are both relatively straightforward Python packages.
--
Thanks,
Regards
On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 04:57:10 -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> Hi Ankur,
>
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 19:54, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Here are a few new NeuroFedora packages that need review. Happy to swap
> > reviews---I only have the one review to do at the moment which
Hi Ankur,
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 19:54, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Here are a few new NeuroFedora packages that need review. Happy to swap
> reviews---I only have the one review to do at the moment which I intend
> to complete over the weekend.
>
If you could, please have a look at:
Hello,
Here are a few new NeuroFedora packages that need review. Happy to swap
reviews---I only have the one review to do at the moment which I intend
to complete over the weekend.
- calcium-calculator: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731528
This is a trivial review. If you are a
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 5:20 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Done the remaining ones :)
Robert-André, you are amazing. Thank you again. Let me know if I can
help you at all. I am deeply in your debt.
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
On Sunday, 7 July 2019 05:01:04 CEST Jerry James wrote:
> I'm working on getting some optional dependencies of sagemath into
> Fedora. All of these should be fairly simple reviews. Let me know
> what I can review for you in exchange.
>
> gap-pkg-happrime:
On Sat, 2019-07-06 at 21:01 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> I'm working on getting some optional dependencies of sagemath into
> Fedora. All of these should be fairly simple reviews. Let me know
> what I can review for you in exchange.
>
> gap-pkg-happrime:
I'm working on getting some optional dependencies of sagemath into
Fedora. All of these should be fairly simple reviews. Let me know
what I can review for you in exchange.
gap-pkg-happrime: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1723997
coxeter:
Hi!
Would anyone like to swap reviews? I've got python-pylatex ready for
review here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721409
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:55 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Still okay for swapping? I'm looking for a review for:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1719798
>
> It's Intel SVT-AV1 encoder, x86_64 only. It is a dev snapshot as the latest
> release does not have the decoder enabled.
On Sunday, 9 June 2019 03:41:00 CEST Jerry James wrote:
> It's time for another game of "my package just grew some new
> dependencies." I need reviews for the following and am willing to do
> reviews in exchange:
>
> 1. catch2: a C++ header-only test framework for unit tests
>
It's time for another game of "my package just grew some new
dependencies." I need reviews for the following and am willing to do
reviews in exchange:
1. catch2: a C++ header-only test framework for unit tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718597
2. cli11: a header-only
Hello folks,
In order to update a few Golang packages, new dependencies needing to
be packaged have appeared. Please, if you have time to help, take a look at
these. They are standard Go packages and all have been tested in Koji or
COPR.
golang-github-getsentry-raven-go
→ need
Hello,
I'd like some help to review my packages, I'll review anything in exchange:
Review Request: golang-github-anacrolix-dms - A UPnP DLNA Digital Media Server
that includes basic video transcoding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684956
Review Request:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:36 AM Tom Hughes wrote:
> I've already done those two...
Well, then, I owe Jared some reviews. Jared, give me a yell the next
time you have packages that need to be reviewed. I'll try to beat Tom
to them next time. :-)
Regards,
--
Jerry James
I've already done those two...
Tom
On 15/02/2019 18:25, Jared K. Smith wrote:
OK, I think your packages all have reviews now. Would you be willing to
do these two in return? They're both re-reviews of previously approved
but then retired NodeJS packages.
nodejs-is-plain-obj:
OK, I think your packages all have reviews now. Would you be willing to do
these two in return? They're both re-reviews of previously approved but
then retired NodeJS packages.
nodejs-is-plain-obj: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1676540
nodejs-event-stream:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 8:09 AM Jared K. Smith wrote:
> I'm reviewing them now, and will respond with two that I'd like you to review
> after I'm done.
Thank you, Jared! Much appreciated.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:01 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> I still need one or more reviewers for these packages.
>
I'm reviewing them now, and will respond with two that I'd like you to
review after I'm done.
-Jared
___
devel mailing list --
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 9:22 PM Jerry James wrote:
> Sagemath 8.6 is out, which means that at long last we can upgrade the
> gap package. Upgrading gap means dealing with the fact that some of
> the fundamental group libraries have now been split out of the main
> package and have their own
Hi all,
Sagemath 8.6 is out, which means that at long last we can upgrade the
gap package. Upgrading gap means dealing with the fact that some of
the fundamental group libraries have now been split out of the main
package and have their own upstream repositories. That means that I
need reviews
Hello,
Here's the next NeuroFedora package that needs review:
- auryn: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671171
Always happy to swap reviews :)
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
If you've submitted a review ticket for wdune already, I will be happy
to review it and provide comments.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153
so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 15:47:00 +0100, J. Scheurich wrote:
>
> > I'd like to get this package reviewed please:
> >
> > - python-pyscaffold: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1669913#
> >
> > Would anyone like to swap reviews?
>
> I would review it for wdune sponsoring.
Sorry---I'm not
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 15:47:00 +0100, J. Scheurich wrote:
>
> > I'd like to get this package reviewed please:
> >
> > - python-pyscaffold: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1669913#
> >
> > Would anyone like to swap reviews?
> >
> I would review it for wdune sponsoring.
Sure. Please
Hello,
I'd like to get this package reviewed please:
- python-pyscaffold: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1669913#
Would anyone like to swap reviews?
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 20:06:27 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Dne 06. 01. 19 v 15:56 Ankur Sinha napsal(a):
> > Thanks for the unofficial review and comments, Manas and Miro.
> >
> > Would someone like to swap reviews please?
> >
> > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662544:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 18:15:47 +0100, Umar Parooq wrote:
> Hi there
Hello,
> I think there are 2 remaining packages for The Virtual Brain to build
> those are Tvb-framework and Tvb-library check here https://github.com/
> the-virtual-brain/
>
Yes, they are next in queue. tvb-library requires
Dne 06. 01. 19 v 15:56 Ankur Sinha napsal(a):
Thanks for the unofficial review and comments, Manas and Miro.
Would someone like to swap reviews please?
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662544: python-tvb-gdist
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662538: python-tvb-data
Hi there I think there are 2 remaining packages for The Virtual Brain to
build those are Tvb-framework and Tvb-library check here
https://github.com/the-virtual-brain/
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019, 3:57 PM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Thanks for the unofficial review and comments, Manas and Miro.
>
> Would
Thanks for the unofficial review and comments, Manas and Miro.
Would someone like to swap reviews please?
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662544: python-tvb-gdist
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662538: python-tvb-data
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
I am taking this
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019, 5:33 PM Ankur Sinha Hello!
>
> Happy new year, everyone!
>
> I've got two simple python packages that need review. Would anyone like
> to swap reviews, please?
>
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662544: python-tvb-gdist
> -
Hello!
Happy new year, everyone!
I've got two simple python packages that need review. Would anyone like
to swap reviews, please?
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662544: python-tvb-gdist
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662538: python-tvb-data
They are both easy
Hello,
Here's another simple python package that needs review for NeuroFedora.
Would someone like to swap reviews please?
python-nineml: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649952
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 21:05:19 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Robert,
> i need help reviewing these packages:
>
> - golang-contrib-opencensus-exporter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
> show_bug.cgi?id=1649059
> - golang-github-census-instrumentation-opencensus-proto
Hi,
i need help reviewing these packages:
- golang-contrib-opencensus-exporter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
show_bug.cgi?id=1649059
- golang-github-census-instrumentation-opencensus-proto https://
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649058
There are simple Golang packages, I'll
Hi Robert,
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 17:12:28 +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> >
> > - python-fsleyes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648916
> > - python-indexed_gzip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648709
>
> I've reviewed both of these, could you do this one in
On lundi 12 novembre 2018 15:03:21 CET Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Two more relatively simple python packages are up for review if anyone
> would like to swap reviews please?
>
> - python-fsleyes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648916
> - python-indexed_gzip:
Hello,
Two more relatively simple python packages are up for review if anyone
would like to swap reviews please?
- python-fsleyes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648916
- python-indexed_gzip: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648709
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 16:49:02 +0530, Farhaan Bukhsh wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 3:27 PM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
>
> Hey Ankur
Hello Farhaan!
>
> I would love to help, but I am new to packaging would be really nice
> if you can guide me through it.
Yes, of course! How about you
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 3:27 PM Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> Hello,
Hey Ankur
>
> libb64 still requires review---thanks to the comments it has already
> received, it should be quite an easy one:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848
>
> python-petlink is another really simple python
Hello,
libb64 still requires review---thanks to the comments it has already
received, it should be quite an easy one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848
python-petlink is another really simple python review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648251
Any takers? I'm
Hello,
Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I've a very simple, straight
forward package that needs review:
libb64: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848
It's a very simple library that's needed for us to package biosig[1].
[1]
101 - 200 of 503 matches
Mail list logo
