I have three outstanding reviews that I'd like to push through so I
can work out the next layer of my dependency tree. I'd be happy to
swap reviews with someone. Links below:
rubygem-async_sinatra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310873
rubygem-benchmark-ips
-RInside
There is a dependency chain: The 3rd depends on the first two, and the
4th depends on the 3rd.
Review swaps welcome.
Mattias
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel
R-inline
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305335 R-Rcpp
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305336 R-RInside
>
> There is a dependency chain: The 3rd depends on the first two, and
> the 4th depends on the 3rd.
>
> Review swaps welcome.
>
>
Sorry for the noise
the right bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301589
.g
Il 26/01/2016 20:27, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
1) pgcenter - Top-like PostgreSQL statistics viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302053
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi!
I'll be happy swap reviews for 3 my packages:
1) pgcenter - Top-like PostgreSQL statistics viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302053
It should be quite simple.
2) pgmodeler - PostgreSQL Database Modeler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977116
It old and bigger.
hi
take!
can you take this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302053
for me?
thanks in advance
.g
Il 26/01/2016 20:27, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto:
1) pgcenter - Top-like PostgreSQL statistics viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302053
It should be quite simple.
--
Hi,
Two easy reviews. These are required to update to sagemath-6.8.
[I will work to update to sagemath-6.9...]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278081
rw - Program that calculates rank-width and rank-decompositions
rw is a program that calculates rank-width and
Hi Paulo,
take!
can take these for me:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193210
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266804
?
thanks in advance
regards
- gil
Il 23/11/2015 15:01, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade ha scritto:
Hi,
Two easy reviews. These are required to
I have these reviews for exchange:
1. gnome-shell-extension-panel-osd: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
g.cgi?id=1246904
a small extension, that makes the placement of shell-notifications on
the desktop configurable.
2. aeskulap: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269649
a
Here are the next 2 steps on the long slow march to the gap HAP
package for sagemath. Only a few left to go! Let me know what I can
review for you in exchange for these reviews.
gap-pkg-smallsemi: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281664
gap-pkg-semigroups:
On 13.11.2015 16:09, Jerry James wrote:
Here are the next 2 steps on the long slow march to the gap HAP
package for sagemath. Only a few left to go! Let me know what I can
review for you in exchange for these reviews.
gap-pkg-smallsemi: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281664
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> If you're okay with mingw packages, I'd like to have these two reviewed:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265853
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265854
>
> Both are straight forward.
Sure,
I need two packages reviews:
1. arb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272606
This is a FLINT add-on that newer versions of sagemath want.
2. gap-pkg-grape: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273244
I finally figured out how to adapt this package so that it uses the
On 10/22/2015 05:04 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> I need two packages reviews:
>
> 1. arb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272606
>This is a FLINT add-on that newer versions of sagemath want.
I take it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272652
--
Antonio Trande
mailto:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 9:39 AM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
hi
take
regards
gil
Thank you! Let me know if you have packages I can review for you.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I need reviews for a couple of packages. Let me know what I can
review for you in exchange.
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252241
gap-pkg-genss, yet another step towards eventually providing
gap-pkg-hap [1] for sagemath to consume. This should be a really easy
review.
-
hi
take
regards
gil
Il 28/08/2015 17:35, Jerry James ha scritto:
I need reviews for a couple of packages. Let me know what I can
review for you in exchange.
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252241
gap-pkg-genss, yet another step towards eventually providing
gap-pkg-hap [1]
Inching closer to the goal of adding the GAP HAP package to Fedora for
sagemath to use, I need a couple more reviews. The first is an
external dependency needed by a forthcoming GAP package [1]. The
second is yet another of the noarch GAP packages that are made to be
simply unpacked in the main
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:32 AM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 27/05/2015 17:28, Jerry James ha scritto:
I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by
sagemath. I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more
will be coming). There are some
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:04 AM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
hi
taken
can you review this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215080
thanks in advance
gil
Taken, and thank you.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Il 27/05/2015 18:04, gil ha scritto:
Il 27/05/2015 17:28, Jerry James ha scritto:
I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by
sagemath. I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more
will be coming). There are some interdependencies, noted below:
1.
Il 27/05/2015 17:28, Jerry James ha scritto:
I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by
sagemath. I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more
will be coming). There are some interdependencies, noted below:
1. gap-pkg-autpgrp:
I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by
sagemath. I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more
will be coming). There are some interdependencies, noted below:
1. gap-pkg-autpgrp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205777
No dependencies.
2.
Il 27/05/2015 17:28, Jerry James ha scritto:
I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by
sagemath. I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more
will be coming). There are some interdependencies, noted below:
1. gap-pkg-autpgrp:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
1. gap-pkg-atlasrep: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185014
2. gap-pkg-browse: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185015
3.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
1. gap-pkg-atlasrep: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185014
2. gap-pkg-browse: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185015
3. gap-pkg-io: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185016
4.
!
About two weeks ago I sent a list of review requests to this list asking
for review swaps. All but one of them were picked up - many thanks to
the reviewers. I can offer to trade the last remaining one on the list
with you:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144801
It looks like I
tor 2015-01-22 klockan 10:48 -0700 skrev Jerry James:
5. gap-pkg-sonata: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185018
Please let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Thank you.
Hi!
About two weeks ago I sent a list of review requests to this list asking
for review swaps
When I iniatially submitted GAP and some of its packages as Fedora
packages, I followed what Debian was doing at the time. I think we
can do a few things a little better now. One way is to stop
translating the GAP package names into human readable form, and just
use the upstream names. Rather
Il 12/01/2015 14:00, Mattias Ellert ha scritto:
Hi!
I have a couple of packages submitted for review and I offer to make
swaps for them:
Globus Toolkit packages (C code - mostly loadable modules)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144800
globus-gridmap-eppn-callout
Hi!
I have a couple of packages submitted for review and I offer to make
swaps for them:
Globus Toolkit packages (C code - mostly loadable modules)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144800
globus-gridmap-eppn-callout
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144801
Hi,
sqlitebrowser still looking for a reviewer :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173375
Thanks!
Sandro
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
El 2014-12-23 15:41, Sandro Mani escribió:
Hi,
sqlitebrowser still looking for a reviewer :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173375
Thanks!
Sandro
Taken.
--
Juan Orti
https://miceliux.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 03:04:36AM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Some packages needing review. All pretty simple cmake/qmake stuff:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173373 - qtspell -
Spell checking for Qt text widgets [*]
-
Hi,
Some packages needing review. All pretty simple cmake/qmake stuff:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173373 - qtspell - Spell
checking for Qt text widgets [*]
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173378 - osgearth -
Dynamic map generation toolkit for OpenSceneGraph
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/11/2014 08:04 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Some packages needing review. All pretty simple cmake/qmake stuff:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173373 - qtspell -
Spell checking for Qt text widgets [*] -
Hi,
I've just submitted a couple of packages and their deps for review that
are useful for computational-neuroscience researchers - I need them for
my research work, for example:
python-pynn - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150105
python-neo -
The upgraded OmegaT requires new (java) dependencies. They are not very
complex:
- gnudiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127879
- jsap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127894
- rundoc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130755
- snip
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
2. python-persistent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102950.
Depends on #1. Ditto the comment for #1.
Ditto. I need another
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:46 PM, nonamedotc nonamed...@gmail.com wrote:
I have taken these two. I hope to do a first pass tomorrow.
Thank you! Let me know if there is something I can review for you
(now or later).
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/29/2014 12:19 PM, Jerry James wrote:
Ditto. I need another review swap for this.
4. python-random2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104322
This one is still up for grabs.
5. python-zodbpickle
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
The python-ZODB3 package, which I maintain, has been split into pieces. I
need several package reviews to get all the new pieces into place. I am happy
to swap reviews for these, but the number of reviews I need is
On 07/29/2014 07:19 PM, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
The python-ZODB3 package, which I maintain, has been split into pieces. I
need several package reviews to get all the new pieces into place. I am
happy
to swap reviews for
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote:
We are victims of same man :D
Victim is kind of a harsh word. I suspect something has happened in
Real Life that is making him extra busy.
Reviews swap between your RR and mine
On 07/29/2014 07:45 PM, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com
wrote:
We are victims of same man :D
Victim is kind of a harsh word. I suspect something has happened in
Real Life that is making him extra busy.
It's a way to saying (in
On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 12:56 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Swap ZODB, sphinx-rtd-theme and BTrees with
1. osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
2. zsh-lovers - A collection of tips, tricks and examples for the Z shell
(This package is pretty
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Jason Taylor jason.tay...@secure-24.com wrote:
Hi Christopher,
I grabbed the zsh-lovers for a formal review.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:56:48PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Swap ZODB, sphinx-rtd-theme and BTrees with
1. osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
I'll take it.
--
Regards,--
Sir Raorn. --- https://plus.google.com/+AlexeyFroloff
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Alexey I. Froloff ra...@raorn.name wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:56:48PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Swap ZODB, sphinx-rtd-theme and BTrees with
1. osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
I'll take it.
Thank
Hi Sandro,
On Wednesday, 25 June 2014 at 15:50, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 25.06.2014 15:33, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Would anyone like to swap reviews?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864
elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalue
The python-ZODB3 package, which I maintain, has been split into pieces. I
need several package reviews to get all the new pieces into place. I am happy
to swap reviews for these, but the number of reviews I need is sufficiently
large that it will take me a little time to get to all of the
Swap ZODB, sphinx-rtd-theme and BTrees with
1. osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
2. zsh-lovers - A collection of tips, tricks and examples for the Z shell
(This package is pretty easy as it only contains a manpage)
Would anyone like to swap reviews?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864
elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalue
problems
This is an optional dependency of cp2k-2.5+ (and comes bundled in cp2k-2.4).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825
On 25.06.2014 15:33, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Would anyone like to swap reviews?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864
elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalue
problems
This is an optional dependency of cp2k-2.5+ (and comes bundled in
Would anyone like to swap reviews? I have 2 pending:
subunit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065539
This subsumes the existing python-subunit package. It would be good
if the reviewer could verify that the python-subunit subpackage is
essentially equivalent to the existing
On 10.02.2014 04:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 07:07:01PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Some more debian packaging stuff, useful when building certain
packages with pbuilder:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044 - dh-autoreconf
- debhelper
Hi,
Some more debian packaging stuff, useful when building certain packages
with pbuilder:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063043 - cdbs - Common
build system for Debian packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044 - dh-autoreconf -
debhelper add-on to call
On 09.02.2014 19:07, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Some more debian packaging stuff, useful when building certain
packages with pbuilder:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063043 - cdbs - Common
build system for Debian packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044 -
I've marked your dput review as duplicate as I closed my dput review bug
months ago.
You can package dput-ng. Dput is nearly dead now.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 10.02.2014 00:58, Christopher Meng wrote:
I've marked your dput review as duplicate as I closed my dput review
bug months ago.
You can package dput-ng. Dput is nearly dead now.
Missed that. Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 07:07:01PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Some more debian packaging stuff, useful when building certain
packages with pbuilder:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063044 - dh-autoreconf
- debhelper add-on to call autoreconf and clean up after the build
Hi Sandro,
Sorry for the delay, but I've been very busy at work for the past
couple weeks. I've only read mails mentioning me, hence the very short
answer on the BZ. I also got sick last friday, before the very weekend
I wanted to work on fedora (your review, but also my packages). It's
only
On 09.10.2013 18:56, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Hi Sandro,
Sorry for the delay, but I've been very busy at work for the past
couple weeks. I've only read mails mentioning me, hence the very short
answer on the BZ. I also got sick last friday, before the very weekend
I wanted to work on fedora
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 11:46 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
we still doesn't have rpmdevtools-8.4 packaged for F21 ...
I'll look into it as soon as it
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
we still doesn't have rpmdevtools-8.4 packaged for F21 ...
I'll look into it as soon as it starts to look that devscripts will be approved.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 04.10.2013 20:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:30:11AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 23.09.2013 02:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On 06.10.2013 06:27, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Seg, 2013-09-23 at 10:30 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 23.09.2013 02:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at
On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 12:05 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
The *-keyring packages are not strictly
dependencies (though they would probably be appropriate Suggests:
if
we had something similar), since pbuilder is not limited to building
packages for debian and ubuntu, but might also be used to
On 07.10.2013 02:17, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 12:05 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
The *-keyring packages are not strictly
dependencies (though they would probably be appropriate Suggests:
if
we had something similar), since pbuilder is not limited to building
packages for debian
On Seg, 2013-10-07 at 02:21 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 07.10.2013 02:17, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 12:05 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
The *-keyring packages are not strictly
dependencies (though they would probably be appropriate Suggests:
if
we had something similar),
On 07.10.2013 02:26, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Seg, 2013-10-07 at 02:21 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 07.10.2013 02:17, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 12:05 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
The *-keyring packages are not strictly
dependencies (though they would probably be appropriate
On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 11:46 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
we still doesn't have rpmdevtools-8.4 packaged for F21 ...
I'll look into it as soon as it starts to look that devscripts will be
approved.
haven't we enter in
On 07.10.2013 02:32, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Dom, 2013-10-06 at 11:46 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
we still doesn't have rpmdevtools-8.4 packaged for F21 ...
I'll look into it as soon as it starts to look that devscripts will
On Seg, 2013-09-23 at 10:30 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 23.09.2013 02:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:30:11AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 23.09.2013 02:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani
On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder (and hence an
easy way to build deb packages from fedora) into the repos (review
here: [1]), I've packaged
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:14:29AM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 20.09.2013 06:37, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder (and hence an
easy way to build deb packages from
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
This has the downside that it'll add the dependency on gnupg,
which is not great. Maybe simply create a keyrings-filesystem
package with this directory and have whoever installs keyrings
depend on it.
If
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder (and hence an easy
way to build deb packages from fedora) into the repos (review here: [1]),
I've packaged devscripts, debian-keyring, ubuntu-keyring and
On 20.09.2013 13:33, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder (and hence an easy
way to build deb packages from fedora) into the repos (review here: [1]),
I've packaged
Hi,
In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder (and hence an
easy way to build deb packages from fedora) into the repos (review here:
[1]), I've packaged devscripts, debian-keyring, ubuntu-keyring and
jetring. Reviews are here:
- jetring:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:41:03PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
In the hope to continue the effort of getting pbuilder (and hence an
easy way to build deb packages from fedora) into the repos (review
here: [1]), I've packaged devscripts, debian-keyring, ubuntu-keyring
and jetring. Reviews
Hey all,
some more lv2 audio plugins up for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006187
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004231
thank you
Brendan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
On 12.09.2013 19:45, Antonio Trande wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/12/2013 07:37 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
I've posted the following package review requests: - #1007539 -
xfoil: Subsonic Airfoil Development System - #1007540 - rotor:
Design and analysis tools for
Okay.
So I'll take those newly updated: avl and xrotor.
Thanks Antonio, let me know if I can review anything in exchange. Btw,
you will notice that they are all very similar, so if you manage those
two, xfoil should be just as easy ;)
Sandro
--
devel mailing list
On 12.09.2013 22:05, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 09/12/2013 09:36 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Okay.
So I'll take those newly updated: avl and xrotor.
Thanks Antonio, let me know if I can review anything in exchange. Btw,
you will notice that they are all very similar, so if you manage those
two,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/12/2013 08:32 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 12.09.2013 19:45, Antonio Trande wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 09/12/2013 07:37 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
I've posted the following package review requests: - #1007539
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/12/2013 09:36 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Okay. So I'll take those newly updated: avl and xrotor.
Thanks Antonio, let me know if I can review anything in exchange.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002251 ;)
Btw,
you will
Hi,
I've posted the following package review requests:
- #1007539 - xfoil: Subsonic Airfoil Development System
- #1007540 - rotor: Design and analysis tools for propellers and windmills
- #1007541 - avl: Aerodynamic and flight-dynamic analysis of rigid aircrafts
They are all fortran/C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/12/2013 07:37 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
I've posted the following package review requests: - #1007539 -
xfoil: Subsonic Airfoil Development System - #1007540 - rotor:
Design and analysis tools for propellers and windmills - #1007541 -
On 09/12/2013 09:36 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Okay.
So I'll take those newly updated: avl and xrotor.
Thanks Antonio, let me know if I can review anything in exchange. Btw,
you will notice that they are all very similar, so if you manage those
two, xfoil should be just as easy ;)
Sandro
I
Hi Christopher,
Would you please review this one ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989015
In exchange I would gladly review your other package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
Dridi
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:29 AM, HAYASHI Kentaro ken...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Of course. Willing to review such packages. But I'm sorry I can't use
computer now.
I will review it tomorrow.
Cheers.
Sent from Note I
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi all!
Are there anybody interested in review swaps about groonga-normalizer-mysq
package?
Here is the brief description of groonga-normalizer-mysql:
MySQL compatible normalizer plugin for groonga
Here is the actual review bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957053
Thanks
Exchange
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972860
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Or this one if you don't like the previous.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989297
fdm - A simple lightweight tool of fetching, filtering and delivering emails
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
Hi,
Thank you for your quick response.
I'll review this one!
fdm - A simple lightweight tool of fetching, filtering and delivering emails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989297
2013/7/29 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com
Or this one if you don't like the previous.
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.comwrote:
SkyX is taken, too.
Swap again with sstp-client, Microsoft Secure Socket Tunneling
Protocol (SSTP) Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976770
I've taken sstp-client, I'll get started on it later
Hi all,
I've got a backlog of submitted package reviews that I'd like to finish
up. If anyone wants to swap for any of the following, let me know and
we'll get started.
These are libraries that should be fairly straghtforward:
sicktoolbox - The SICK LIDAR Toolbox -
On 07/21/2013 08:29 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
I've taken mosquitto aka BZ#958585.
Swap with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975701
Thanks Christopher, I've taken pcapfix.
Rich
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
301 - 400 of 503 matches
Mail list logo