On 21/05/13 09:29, Björn Esser wrote:
Allright, then! Thanks for your answers!
I'll have a _strong_ look in
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript
Well you shouldn't need to worry about that one for a new package,
unless you're wanting to support EPEL.
* https://fed
Allright, then! Thanks for your answers!
I'll have a _strong_ look in
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd
for improving my mind/knowlegde...
Any other places I should have look in, too?
Cheers,
Björn
--
devel mailing
On 21/05/13 08:51, Björn Esser wrote:
In maintainer's `generic-all-purpose-and-all-rpm-dists` spec-file there
is this scriptlet inside %install for creating/providing the needed
socket:
/scriptlet/
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_localstatedir}/spool/authdaemon/
./authmksock %{buildroot}%{_l
Le Mar 21 mai 2013 09:51, Björn Esser a écrit :
> My question about this is:
> Can I take this one-by-one in my fedora-rpm or is it better to provide
> the same functionality during %post and %preun?
IMHO, you'll need to take a hard look at systedifying all this first
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mail
Hello!
I'm currently work on packaging `courier-authlib` (needed for pkg'ing
and running courier MTA).
In maintainer's `generic-all-purpose-and-all-rpm-dists` spec-file there
is this scriptlet inside %install for creating/providing the needed
socket:
/scriptlet/
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_loca
