Re: Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?

2016-03-04 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 3.3.2016 v 20:00 Michael Catanzaro napsal(a): > On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 15:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT? > See: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747339#c20 Thx for the link. I was not aware of this change. Vít -- devel mailin

Re: Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?

2016-03-03 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 15:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT? See: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747339#c20 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?

2016-03-03 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 15:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT? > > I.e. my 1st VT always contains the GDM and 2nd VT actually displays the > Wayland user session. That is confusing, looking like that nobody is > logged in ... That's how GDM (and prett

Re: Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?

2016-03-03 Thread Tom Hughes
On 03/03/16 14:47, Vít Ondruch wrote: Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT? I.e. my 1st VT always contains the GDM and 2nd VT actually displays the Wayland user session. That is confusing, looking like that nobody is logged in ... Exactly the as X does in recent releases you mean? Tom -- Tom

Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?

2016-03-03 Thread Vít Ondruch
Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT? I.e. my 1st VT always contains the GDM and 2nd VT actually displays the Wayland user session. That is confusing, looking like that nobody is logged in ... Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel