Dne 3.3.2016 v 20:00 Michael Catanzaro napsal(a):
> On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 15:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?
> See: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747339#c20
Thx for the link. I was not aware of this change.
Vít
--
devel mailin
On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 15:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?
See: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747339#c20
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 15:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?
>
> I.e. my 1st VT always contains the GDM and 2nd VT actually displays the
> Wayland user session. That is confusing, looking like that nobody is
> logged in ...
That's how GDM (and prett
On 03/03/16 14:47, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?
I.e. my 1st VT always contains the GDM and 2nd VT actually displays the
Wayland user session. That is confusing, looking like that nobody is
logged in ...
Exactly the as X does in recent releases you mean?
Tom
--
Tom
Why Wayland session runs on 2nd VT?
I.e. my 1st VT always contains the GDM and 2nd VT actually displays the
Wayland user session. That is confusing, looking like that nobody is
logged in ...
Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel