Re: afflib (again) (was: Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks))
On 11/30/18 5:29 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:27:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> This is essentially a repeat of what I wrote back in September: >> >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BN3VZEBKNWO4K77F3YJD2KMIKIBTYZY7/ >> >> lzma is dead upstream. >> >> afflib bundles lzma as well as depending on it. >> >> It seems as if it was intended to remove the bundled copy and use >> lzma. But now we'd probably want to keep the bundle and use it >> instead of the dependency (see patch). >> >> However since neither of those happened we're stuck. What is the >> resolution for this? > > I suppose at least part of the problem is ... > > (expanded from ): host > mx1.seznam.cz[77.75.78.42] said: 550 5.7.1 Sender Policy Framework of > `redhat.com' domain denied your IP address. (in reply to MAIL FROM > command) > Rich. Can you provide the entire set of headers here? It's hard to tell whats going on without the whole picture. Feel free to just send that to me directly... kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: afflib (again) (was: Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks))
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:27:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > This is essentially a repeat of what I wrote back in September: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BN3VZEBKNWO4K77F3YJD2KMIKIBTYZY7/ > > lzma is dead upstream. > > afflib bundles lzma as well as depending on it. > > It seems as if it was intended to remove the bundled copy and use > lzma. But now we'd probably want to keep the bundle and use it > instead of the dependency (see patch). > > However since neither of those happened we're stuck. What is the > resolution for this? I suppose at least part of the problem is ... (expanded from ): host mx1.seznam.cz[77.75.78.42] said: 550 5.7.1 Sender Policy Framework of `redhat.com' domain denied your IP address. (in reply to MAIL FROM command) Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
afflib (again) (was: Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks))
This is essentially a repeat of what I wrote back in September: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BN3VZEBKNWO4K77F3YJD2KMIKIBTYZY7/ lzma is dead upstream. afflib bundles lzma as well as depending on it. It seems as if it was intended to remove the bundled copy and use lzma. But now we'd probably want to keep the bundle and use it instead of the dependency (see patch). However since neither of those happened we're stuck. What is the resolution for this? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top diff --git a/afflib.spec b/afflib.spec index 4077ba6..c29d184 100644 --- a/afflib.spec +++ b/afflib.spec @@ -16,8 +16,6 @@ BuildRequires: curl-devel BuildRequires: expat-devel # GPLv2 FOSS incompatible with BSD with advertising ##BuildRequires: fuse-devel -# Afflib uses lzma-SDK 443 -BuildRequires: lzma-devel BuildRequires: ncurses-devel BuildRequires: libtermcap-devel BuildRequires: openssl-devel @@ -27,6 +25,8 @@ BuildRequires: python2-devel #BuildRequires: libedit-devel - good replacement for readline - not supported for now BuildRequires: zlib-devel +Provides: bundled(lzma) = 4.43 + %description AFF® is an open and extensible file format designed to store disk images and ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
