Re: review swap for vcglib

Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989 I also cannot find the "muftii" FAS account you listed in this bug ... Sorry, typo: it should be "mufti11" 8-( I'm available for any review in exchange. My initial

Re: review swap for vcglib

On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:15 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:02 PM J. Scheurich wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989 I also cannot find the "muftii"

Re: review swap for vcglib

On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 12:02 PM J. Scheurich wrote: > > Hi, > > Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989 It's usually enough to ask the original reviewer to unset and set the "fedora-review: +" flag if the

review swap for vcglib

Hi, Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for vcglib: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989 I'm available for any review in exchange. My initial target is wdune (white_dune), but it also requires OpenSubdiv. There is a fedora 30 package for OpenSubdiv and a

review swap for wdune (white_dune)

Hi, Cause the last review is too old, i need a fresh review for wdune (white_dune): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153 This package requires vcglib: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989 I'm available for any review in exchange. so long MUFTI

Re: Review swap: python-graph-tool (Was: Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build)

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019, 03:32 Ankur Sinha wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763597 > I'll trade you for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763261 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Review swap (htslib)

Hi Zbigniew and Kevin Many thanks for your explanation. I clearly understand the htslib's situation now. -- Jun | He - His - Him ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Review swap: python-graph-tool (Was: Re: Packaging graph-tool: help speeding up build)

Hello, It finally built, and I have a review up here if anyone would like to swap reviews: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763597 Thanks for your help, everyone, -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time

Re: Review swap (htslib)

Jun Aruga wrote: > Someone, could give us advice about below situation, if the new > package htslib's "/usr/lib64/libhts.so.1.9" is valid? > "1.9" is upstream software's version. "2" is ABI's version (so version). This can happen with non-autotools, non-libtool projects. libtool enforces some

Re: Review swap (htslib)

On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 06:03:26PM +0200, Jun Aruga wrote: > Someone, could give us advice about below situation, if the new > package htslib's "/usr/lib64/libhts.so.1.9" is valid? > "1.9" is upstream software's version. "2" is ABI's version (so version). The patterns used in filenames of so

Re: Review swap (htslib)

Someone, could give us advice about below situation, if the new package htslib's "/usr/lib64/libhts.so.1.9" is valid? "1.9" is upstream software's version. "2" is ABI's version (so version). ``` sh-5.0# ls -l /usr/lib64/libhts.so* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 Oct 2 23:50 /usr/lib64/libhts.so

Review swap (htslib)

Hi all, Someone (especially proven packagers), could you review below library package related to bio science? It has already been reviewed several times. I think I fixed every items mentioned by a reviewer. Review Request: htslib - C library for high-throughput sequencing data formats (required

Review swap

Hi all, Is anyone interested in a review swap for a Python(-ish) package? cocotb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747574 Happy to review anything in exchange. Cheers, Ben Rosser ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Trivial review swap: taskopen

Hello, Would anyone like to swap trivial reviews? I have "taskopen" here ready for a full review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743802 taskopen- Script for taking notes and open urls with taskwarrior. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |

Re: NeuroFedora review swap: python-SALib

On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 11:35:44 +0200, Tomas Korbar wrote: > Hi, > I could take this review. I hope you do not mind that i do not have package in > need of review. Not at all, please proceed :) -- Thanks very much, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |

Re: NeuroFedora review swap: python-SALib

Hi, I could take this review. I hope you do not mind that i do not have package in need of review. On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 10:21 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello, > > Would anyone like to swap reviews please? python-SALib needs review for > inclusion in NeuroFedora: > >

NeuroFedora review swap: python-SALib

Hello, Would anyone like to swap reviews please? python-SALib needs review for inclusion in NeuroFedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737770 It's a relatively simple package. Folks looking for sponsorship, please feel free to review it unofficially too. -- Thanks, Regards,

Sundials2 and review swap

Hi all. Package review of Sundials2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733704 Available to reviewing another package in return. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/

Review Swap

Hi, I am happy to try my hand at a review swap. I have worked with simple python and golang packages. I have the exciting multi-git-status on offer. This is a bash script. Review Request: multi-git-status - Show uncommitted, untracked and unpushed changes for multiple Git repos https

Review swap

Hello, I'd like a review for go2rpm: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1729235 I can do any review in exchange. Best regards, Robert-André ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Package review swap (for a simple package)

Hi All, The work I've been doing to improve support for Logitech wireless keyboards: https://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/21731.html Has branched out a bit and now I've also been looking into improving support for keyboards with builtin LCD panels. So now I would like to add support for the LCD

Re: Review swap - zeal

I can review it without swap. вт, 28 мая 2019 г. в 13:55, Lumir Balhar : > > Hello. > > I'd like to claim ownership of retired package zeal, which is currently > in weird state not available in F30. > > Original bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701666 > Review request:

Review swap - zeal

Hello. I'd like to claim ownership of retired package zeal, which is currently in weird state not available in F30. Original bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701666 Review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711898 Will take a review in exchange for

Review swap: libnbd - a small C library with Python 3 binding

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713767 libnbd is a library we're planning to use in a few places where we need a client library to access NBD servers. It's a small C library that also builds Python bindings as a subpackage. Will take a review in exchange for something of similar

Review swap: easy library needed for new supertuxkart

See subject. Willing to review one of yours if you like. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701995 --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

Package review swap (for a simple package)

Hi All, I recently bought a 2nd hand MX5000 keyboard, which has a builtin LCD panel. So now I would like to add MX5000 support to the Fedora lcdproc packages. This requires libmx5000 which is part of mx5000-tools, so I've packaged\ this up, review request here:

review swap: ibsim

subnet management is involved. I can review package wrote in C/bash as review swap. thanks ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

Re: Review swap: newsboat

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 9:04 AM J. Scheurich wrote: > I would review it (unclear, if i have the rights (i have a fedora > account, but i don't know, if this is sufficent for a offical review)) > in return for white_dune fedora sponsoring... Mufti, don't despair! We're getting there. Let's keep

Re: Review swap: newsboat

On 15. 02. 19 17:01, J. Scheurich wrote:> I would review it (unclear, if i have the rights (i have a fedora > account, but i don't know, if this is sufficent for a offical review)) > in return for white_dune fedora sponsoring... I'm not able to sponsor new packagers, sorry. In the meantime, the

Re: Review swap: newsboat

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 5:04 PM J. Scheurich wrote: > > Hi, > > > I have packaged terminal RSS/Atom reader newsboat [1] for Fedora, and I > > would like to have it reviewed [2] (ideally before F30 beta). Any > > volunteers? > > I would review it (unclear, if i have the rights (i have a fedora >

Re: Review swap: newsboat

Hi, I have packaged terminal RSS/Atom reader newsboat [1] for Fedora, and I would like to have it reviewed [2] (ideally before F30 beta). Any volunteers? I would review it (unclear, if i have the rights (i have a fedora account, but i don't know, if this is sufficent for a offical review)) in

Review swap: newsboat

Hi all, I have packaged terminal RSS/Atom reader newsboat [1] for Fedora, and I would like to have it reviewed [2] (ideally before F30 beta). Any volunteers? I offer to do a package review in return -- let me know if you need anything reviewed. Best regards, Jan [1]: https://newsboat.org/ [2]:

Re: Asking for a review swap Was: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

* J. Scheurich [13/01/2019 09:42] : > > What can be improvided ? Hi. I reviewed your spec file and found a number of chnages that could me made. * The tags would be more readable if their values were aligned. * This is the longest description I've ever seen. I would shorten it. * Some lines are

Re: Asking for a review swap Was: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:55:22 +0100 Dan Horák wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:42:55 +0100 > "J. Scheurich" wrote: > > > > > > I have looked at your spec/srpm and it needs much improvement, > > > > What can be improvided ? > > The srpm produces a valid rpm on all architecures, > > all tips of

Re: Asking for a review swap Was: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

I added a comment to the bug review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153#c16 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Asking for a review swap Was: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:42:55 +0100 "J. Scheurich" wrote: > > > I have looked at your spec/srpm and it needs much improvement, > > What can be improvided ? > The srpm produces a valid rpm on all architecures, > all tips of > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653481 > > has been

Re: Asking for a review swap Was: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

> I have looked at your spec/srpm and it needs much improvement, What can be improvided ? The srpm produces a valid rpm on all architecures, all tips of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653481 has been followed. so long MUFTI ___ devel

Re: Asking for a review swap Was: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

I have looked at your spec/srpm and it needs much improvement, it demonstrates that your rpm packaging skills are lacking . Did you even take the time to read the Fedora packaging guidelines? Currently I wouldn't consider sponsoring you and I doubt anyone else will till it improves.

Re: Asking for a review swap Was: Why no wdune sponsoring ?

Asking for a review swap is usually done as a post to this very "devel" mailing list, and it includes the package name, bugzilla link, and which kinds of packages you can review in return. package  name: wdune (whitr_dune) bugzilla link:   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_

Review Swap - Netatalk an AFP server

One of the nice things about Netatalk is that it fully emulates an Apple Time Machine Volume. Mac clients don't know the difference. This is in contrast to emulating a time machine volume through NFS. Using NFS for time machine backups does not have quite the same user experience. That might

Re: Review Swap - netatalk and dymo-cups-drivers

Thanks! I'll get on it. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines:

Re: Review Swap - netatalk and dymo-cups-drivers

On Sat, 2019-01-05 at 14:35 +, Andrew Bauer wrote: > I've got a couple of review requests in need of a reviewer: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659709 Hello, I'll review dymo-cups-drivers, could you review qt5-qtpbfimageformat [1] in return? Thanks, Nikola [1]

Review Swap - netatalk and dymo-cups-drivers

I've got a couple of review requests in need of a reviewer: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659709 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658199 These are pretty straightforward. Nothing terribly complicated. I would be glad to review someone else's review request(s) to

Re: Review swap: python-libNeuroML

On 25.10.2018 21:17, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hello, Would someone like to swap reviews please? I have a simple python package that needs reviewing: python-libNeuroML: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643266 I've taken it. No need for any review in return. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone:

Review swap: python-libNeuroML

Hello, Would someone like to swap reviews please? I have a simple python package that needs reviewing: python-libNeuroML: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643266 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London

[Review swap] libneurosim: Common interfaces for neuronal simulators

Hello, Would someone like to please swap reviews? I'd like to get libneurosim[1] reviewed since it's needed for other NeuroFedora packages. This one is also built with and without MPI support, so the spec is slightly longer than normal. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638968 --

Re: Review swap: easy Python module

On vendredi 28 septembre 2018 21:15:14 CEST Gwyn Ciesla wrote: I'd like a swap with: android-file-transfer - Reliable MTP client with minimalistic UI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633317 Best regards, Robert-André ___ devel mailing

Review swap: easy Python module

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1634087 I'll take one of yours, if you like. Thank you! -- Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: Review swap, Perl flavored

On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 23.12.22 WEST Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Hello, > > > Today is my first year anniversary of contributing to Fedora, yay us! Congratulations for all your (hard) work Robert-André. :-) Regards, -- José Abílio ___ devel

Review swap, Perl flavored

Hello, Today is my first year anniversary of contributing to Fedora, yay us! I've just proposed a Perl program to review: Bug 1610554 - (perl-Crypt-HSXKPasswd) Review Request: hsxkpasswd - Secure memorable password generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610554 Description: A

Re: Review swap request

On 6/2/2018 1:34 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Hi all, > > The linux-igd package no longer builds against the latest libupnp > package and upstream is dead so I'm going to retire it. > > To replace it I am packaging miniupnpd, which is strangely not in > Fedora while the client tool, miniupnpc,

Review swap request

Hi all, The linux-igd package no longer builds against the latest libupnp package and upstream is dead so I'm going to retire it. To replace it I am packaging miniupnpd, which is strangely not in Fedora while the client tool, miniupnpc, is packaged.

Re: Package review swap request

On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 10:40 AM Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Hello, > Wine 3.9 has introduced a dependency on a new library for Direct3D 12 functionality. > I'd like to get this package review ASAP. Please share a review you would like to swap. > vkd3d -

Package review swap request

Hello, Wine 3.9 has introduced a dependency on a new library for Direct3D 12 functionality. I'd like to get this package review ASAP. Please share a review you would like to swap. vkd3d - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582861 Thanks, Michael

Re: Review Swap

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to do rename of rpkg-client > (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpkg-client) to rpkg-util and also I > would like to go the package again through a review process because the spec > might deserve

Review Swap

Hello, I would like to do rename of rpkg-client ( https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpkg-client) to rpkg-util and also I would like to go the package again through a review process because the spec might deserve some care: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563184 Can I possibly swap

Re: Review swap

Am Sonntag, den 03.12.2017, 19:36 +0100 schrieb Robert-André Mauchin: > On dimanche 3 décembre 2017 16:24:38 CET Björn 'besser82' Esser > wrote: > > Hello folks, > > > > I have a few simple gnome-shell-extension packages to offer for > > review > > and wi

Re: Review swap

On dimanche 3 décembre 2017 16:24:38 CET Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Hello folks, > > I have a few simple gnome-shell-extension packages to offer for review > and will review swap a complicated package or few other easy to review > packages. > > > https://bugzilla.re

Review swap

Hello folks, I have a few simple gnome-shell-extension packages to offer for review and will review swap a complicated package or few other easy to review packages. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520149 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520150 https

[review-swap] scribus-generator

Hello team, I am interested for a review swap with a simple add-on named scribus-generator, a mail-merge type template for Scribus useful for making business card for example. The link for the review is on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519081 More info about the addon on https

Review swap: Vimiv - An image viewer with vim-like keybindings

Hello, If anyone has any simple reviews pending, I'd love to do a swap. I've packaged up Vimiv which is a great viewer with Vim like keybindings ready for review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517006 Here's a copr for people that would like to try it out in the meantime:

Review Swap

Hi, could someone with MPI experience do these reviews: 1.) mpibash - Parallel scripting right from the Bourne-Again Shell 2.) libcircle - A library used to distribute workloads Except

review-swap: python-cypari2

python-cypari2 - A Python interface to the number theory library pari https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511554 This package is basically previous sagemath pari interfaces, no as a standalone package. It is required to update to sagemath 8.0 Thanks, Paulo

Re: 1 review swap

egacy", but some important Fedora packages depend on > it, notably Coq. I swapped it for: Jakub Janco Review swap for perl-LMDB_File Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpr

Review swap for perl-LMDB_File

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510877 LMDB_File is a Perl wrapper around the OpenLDAP's LMDB (Lightning Memory-Mapped Database) C library. -- Best Regards, Jakub Janco RH - Brno - TPB-C ___ devel mailing list --

1 review swap

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510869 ocaml-num used to be a part of the OCaml compiler up to 4.05.0. It has now been spun out into a separate package. It's marked as "legacy", but some important Fedora packages depend on it, notably Coq. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization

Review swap: python-mpd2: It is a Python library which provides a client interface for MPD

Hello, Another simple python package that I'd like reviewed - would someone like to swap reviews please? :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507235 (It's holding up the update of another package: mpdris2) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"

Review swap: python-rstcheck - Checks syntax of reStructuredText and code blocks nested within it

Hello, Would anyone like to swap reviews? python-rstcheck is a rather simple python package, so I'd be happy to review a similar package in return. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506405 -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Review Swap

libstorj - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506315 Needed to enable Storj support for FileZilla.  I'll take one of yours. -Gwyn -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love

Review swap

Easy python module, python-Mastodon: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1502072 I'll take one of yours in return if you like. Thanks all! -Gwyn -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear,

Re: Review swap

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Robert-André Mauchin <zebo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is anyone interested by a review swap? I'd like my package rclone [1] to be > reviewed (it's written in Golang). Except php and Java with which I'm not > familiar, I think I can handle anything else.

Review swap

Hello, Is anyone interested by a review swap? I'd like my package rclone [1] to be reviewed (it's written in Golang). Except php and Java with which I'm not familiar, I think I can handle anything else. Best regards, Robert-André [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473314

Re: Review swap

Hi Volerk, Hello Andrea! > > Please add it to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GIS > Added!! Bye, Andrea ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap

Am 2017-08-23 um 12:16 schrieb Andrea Musuruane: Hi! I'm looking for a reviewer for osmctools - Tools to manipulate OpenStreetMap files: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464777 Maybe some other OSM mapper is interested? I'm happy to exchange reviews. Thanks in advance. Bye,

Re: Review swap

Hi, On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Andrea, > > I've taken it, but my ISP is giving me some trouble at the moment, > they said they'll get things sorted out within the hour. > > I don't have a package ready for review yet, but I

Re: Review swap

Hello Andrea, I've taken it, but my ISP is giving me some trouble at the moment, they said they'll get things sorted out within the hour. I don't have a package ready for review yet, but I think I might have one by next week. ___ devel mailing list --

Review swap

Hi! I'm looking for a reviewer for osmctools - Tools to manipulate OpenStreetMap files: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464777 Maybe some other OSM mapper is interested? I'm happy to exchange reviews. Thanks in advance. Bye, Andrea

Re: review swap

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 6:32 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > I'm looking for a reviewer for > > Bug 1478231 – Review Request: conda - Cross-platform, Python-agnostic > binary package manager > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1478231 Taken. You helped a lot to deepin

review swap

I'm looking for a reviewer for Bug 1478231 – Review Request: conda - Cross-platform, Python-agnostic binary package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1478231 I can review stuff in return. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Review swap: gimp-luminosity-masks

I've taken it, though I don't have anything ready for review right now. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Review swap: gimp-luminosity-masks

Hello team, I am looking for a review swap for gimp-luminosity-masks: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476440 The package is very simple and easy to review. Thanks in advance, -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm

Review swap: qbs - Cross platform build tool

Hi Upstream notified me that the way qbs is currently packaged (as part of qt-creator) is wrong, and that it should live in a separate package with the correct version (instead of using the qt-creator version). The review request for the split-off qbs package is here:

Re: Review swap

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > Hi Gwyn, > > I'll take this in exchange for wordgrinder: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460246 > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gwyn Ciesla wrote: > > I just submitted

Re: Review swap

Hi Gwyn, I'll take this in exchange for wordgrinder: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460246 On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gwyn Ciesla wrote: > I just submitted python-slackclient: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467995 > > Willing to do one

Review swap

I just submitted python-slackclient: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467995 Willing to do one of yours. Thanks! -G -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie

Re: Review swap request for package cvechecker

e. >> >> So I did commented in comment 7 this March. However, there is no update >> till now. I dropped an email to packaging list[2] just now and Tomas >> suggest me to ask for a review swap request. > > Zamir, > > open a new bug, and close #1062808 as the duplicate of

Re: Review swap request for package cvechecker

; till now. I dropped an email to packaging list[2] just now and Tomas > suggest me to ask for a review swap request. Zamir, open a new bug, and close #1062808 as the duplicate of the new one. Package review bugs are always tied to the name of the ori

Review swap request for package cvechecker

for a review swap request. So I am writing to see if anyone can help me with the process. Thanks! [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062808 [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/QXKAKW72B73CGBJHHUATW6SMP2F2XORK/?sort=date -- Ziqian SUN

Review swap

Hi all, could somebody please review the package of this small library: ? I will take another review in exchange. Thanks, Christoph -- Christoph Junghans Web: http://www.compphys.de ___ devel

Re: Review swap

Am 15.06.2017 um 11:46 schrieb Michal Novotny: Hello, I have implemented a set of macros specific for module development. I would be happy to review your package if you can review mine: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461769 clime Just assigned. It would be great, if you

Review swap

Hello, I have implemented a set of macros specific for module development. I would be happy to review your package if you can review mine: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461769 clime ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Review swap

Hi! I'd like to upgrade Frescobaldi to 3.0.0, and I need python3-poppler-qt5 to do it. If you can review it, I'll do one of yours. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1459914 Thanks! -G -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/

Review swap

Hey all, I've got a package I need reviewed[0]. Is anyone interested in doing a review swap? [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418396 -- Jeremy Cline XMPP: jer...@jcline.org IRC: jcline signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Review swap requests

Hi! I am offering two python packages for review swapping: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448040 Review Request: python-ipyparallel - Interactive Parallel Computing with IPython https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448041 Review Request: python-metakernel - Metakernel for

Re: Review swap: watchman - a file watching service

Sorry I think I got a bit confused, but yes I can only do an informal review. Thanks for the reply On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Athos Ribeiro <athoscribe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:03:12PM +0100, Matthew Smith wrote: >> Hello all, I am looking for a re

Re: Review swap: watchman - a file watching service

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:03:12PM +0100, Matthew Smith wrote: > Hello all, I am looking for a review swap, here is a link to my bug: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450590 > > Also I'm looking to get sponsored. > > Thank you :) Hello Matthew, As I poi

Review swap: watchman - a file watching service

Hello all, I am looking for a review swap, here is a link to my bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450590 Also I'm looking to get sponsored. Thank you :) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Review swap: keepassxc - Cross-platform password manager

Review request has been taken ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Review swap: keepassxc - Cross-platform password manager

‎Hello, I am looking for a review swap: here is mine: keepassxc - Cross-platform password manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1450633 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

Re: [review-swap] swatchbooker

Hi Luya, On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > I am looking for swaping review with swatchbooker: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441046 > An odd issue is the startup of the application with the correct path > within the binary

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >