Hi folks,
I'm an ambassador of Fedora Project since years ago. I've been a
FC user since 2004. I just filed a package review request
for monitorix, a free, open source, lightweight system monitoring tool
designed
to monitor as many services and system resources as possible.
The package review
Hi, this is a test message.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I'm working on the unbundling effort for python-requests. One
stepping stone in that path is the following review request (for which
I am soliciting potential reviewers):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907688
That one is the highest priority, but there are a few other reviews
Hi Ralph,
I've taken this one and will review it before EOD.
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 11:13 -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907688
Could you please review either
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912048 - mpDris2
or
Hello, all:
I have some packages related to rubygems ready for review
and I would like to swap reviews. Each package is small and
should not take so much time.
rubygem-levenshtein
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891970
rubygem-gobject-introspection
On 01/31/2013 01:32 PM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Hello, all:
I have some packages related to rubygems ready for review
and I would like to swap reviews. Each package is small and
should not take so much time.
rubygem-levenshtein
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891970
Brendan Jones wrote, at 01/31/2013 11:47 PM +9:00:
On 01/31/2013 01:32 PM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Hello, all:
I have some packages related to rubygems ready for review
and I would like to swap reviews. Each package is small and
should not take so much time.
rubygem-levenshtein
Hi all,
I have the following outstanding packages ready to be reviewed. All are
small and shouldn't be too taxing.
radium-compressor - A Qt compressor with an intuitive GUI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904658
lv2-newtonator - an LV2 synth plugin that uses the physical
This should be a very easy one
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881794
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
I have one pending package review that I would like to swap:
babeltrace - Trace Viewer and Converter, mainly for the Common Trace
Format (LTTng)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846488
Thanks,
Yannick
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 01/08/2013 08:16 PM, Yannick Brosseau wrote:
Hi,
I have one pending package review that I would like to swap:
babeltrace - Trace Viewer and Converter, mainly for the Common Trace
Format (LTTng)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846488
Thanks,
Yannick
I'll take this if you can
On 2013-01-08 14:26, Brendan Jones wrote:
On 01/08/2013 08:16 PM, Yannick Brosseau wrote:
Hi,
I have one pending package review that I would like to swap:
babeltrace - Trace Viewer and Converter, mainly for the Common Trace
Format (LTTng)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846488
Thanks Andreas! Very interesting indeed!
Mario
On 18 December 2012 20:28, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Hi Mario,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 06:04:24PM +0100, Mario Ceresa wrote:
Hi, I'm packaging OpenIGTLink (http://openigtlink.org/) and I'd like
to swap reviews:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:58:39PM +0100, Mario Blättermann wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 19. Dezember 2012, 14:30:53 schrieb Neil Horman:
Hey all-
I've got this package I'm trying to get reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884291
Will to swap for it if anyone is
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:09:19PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 12/19/2012 12:30 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
Hey all-
I've got this package I'm trying to get reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884291
Will to swap for it if anyone is interested.
How come nobody
Hey all-
I've got this package I'm trying to get reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884291
Will to swap for it if anyone is interested.
Neil
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 12/19/2012 12:30 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
Hey all-
I've got this package I'm trying to get reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884291
Will to swap for it if anyone is interested.
How come nobody ever bothers to add any description of said package to these
type of
Am Mittwoch, 19. Dezember 2012, 14:30:53 schrieb Neil Horman:
Hey all-
I've got this package I'm trying to get reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884291
Will to swap for it if anyone is interested.
Neil
I'll do the review. Please have a look at my open review
Hi, I've got a few packages I'd like to get through review and will swap
reviews with anybody to do so.
qpid-proton
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=874105
rubygem-bicho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836368
rubygem-inifile
Anyone interested in a package review swap?
python-logutils:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884041
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I'll do it.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Bean
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 11:56 AM
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Solicitation: Review Swap
Anyone interested
Anyone interested in a review swaping? Here is mine:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877403
--
Ismael Olea
http://olea.org/diario/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 11/25/2012 05:37 PM, Ismael Olea wrote:
Anyone interested in a review swaping? Here is mine:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877403
--
Ismael Olea
http://olea.org/diario/
I can take this on for giada -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866156
cheers
Brendan
--
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Note that there is negative time to achieve this f18 feature, that has
moved to target f19. ;)
IMHO, given how this is a new package which isn't going to break anything
else, this is a perfect candidate for a late feature exception.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 06:50:02AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Note that there is negative time to achieve this f18 feature, that has
moved to target f19. ;)
IMHO, given how this is a new package which isn't going to break anything
else, this is a perfect candidate for a late feature
Hello guys and girls,
I need a review for owncloud:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841
the licences are good, note that there is not much time left if we want to
achieve this approved f18 feature [1]
I admit, this package is quite big. But in return I would be happy to review
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 10:49:04PM +0100, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
Hello guys and girls,
I need a review for owncloud:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841
the licences are good, note that there is not much time left if we want to
achieve this approved f18 feature [1]
I admit,
On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 22:49:04 +0100
Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de wrote:
Hello guys and girls,
I need a review for owncloud:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858841
the licences are good, note that there is not much time left if we
want to achieve this approved f18 feature
Hi folks,
Would any one want to swap reviews with me? I'd like to get this one
reviewed:
xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file
format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=871629
I'll be happy to review a package in return.
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur:
Hi,
I would be willing to swap a review of vdr-markad [1] in rpmfusion for another
review, be it RPM Fusion or Fedora, preferably not something overly
complex. Feel free to contact me if you are interested.
Cheers,
Martin
[1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2319
--
devel
Hello,
Anyone interested in swapping package reviews?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853252
Thanks in advance-
-Ralph
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:12:13AM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
This package was being reviewed, but the review disappeared on me almost
two months ago:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834070
I'm still looking for someone who would like to do a review swap with
me.
--
Darryl
This package was being reviewed, but the review disappeared on me almost
two months ago:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834070
--
Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com
http://mcpierce.multiply.com/
What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?
pgptMrCuQxySV.pgp
Description: PGP
Hi folks,
Would anyone want to swap reviews? I need octave-nnet[1] reviewed.
(It's my first octave package, so a reviewer with some octave packaging
experience would be preferred ;))
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847952
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur: FranciscoD
Please
On 03/08/12 22:29, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845681
It's a fairly trivial python/Django package, needed for supporting the
new version of ReviewBoard (which is currently nonfunctional in F17/F18
because the previous version is incompatible with
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 09:16 +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 03/08/12 22:29, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845681
It's a fairly trivial python/Django package, needed for supporting the
new version of ReviewBoard (which is currently nonfunctional in
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 09:16 +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 03/08/12 22:29, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845681
It's a fairly trivial python/Django package, needed for
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 19:55 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
So, unfortunately I didn't do my homework and I discovered (after
getting this package reviewed, approved and committed), that they broke
API in a recent
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:06:43 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
How do I tell if it went through a mash yet?
The rawhide compose starts at 08:15 UTC each day.
If it's before then, you are ok.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:06:43 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
How do I tell if it went through a mash yet?
The rawhide compose starts at 08:15 UTC each day.
If it's before then, you are ok.
In that case,
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 20:23 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:06:43 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
How do I tell if it went through a mash yet?
The rawhide compose starts at 08:15 UTC
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 20:23 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:06:43 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
How do I
Still interested in a review swap?
I could use a review for this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838239
Regards,
Matt
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.comwrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841648
I've renamed rubygem-qpid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845681
It's a fairly trivial python/Django package, needed for supporting the
new version of ReviewBoard (which is currently nonfunctional in F17/F18
because the previous version is incompatible with Django 1.4).
I'll happily review a similarly simple
Hi all
I have a review request for qtractor-freeworld in rpmfusion. It
implements a patch that allows the dynamic loading of the libmad MP3
decoder for qtractor.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2414
thanks
Brendan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841648
I've renamed rubygem-qpid to rubygem-qpid-messaging and would like to do
a review swap with anybody else who has a Ruby package to be reviewed.
--
Darryl L. Pierce mcpie...@gmail.com
http://mcpierce.multiply.com/
What do you care what people
Hi all,
this package is required for the forthcoming Fedora audio spin. Would be
great to get this reviewed before the Spin review.
rtirq - realtime IRQ threading
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839527
regards,
Brendan
bsjones
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hey,
I will take this.
Could you take devtodo2 or prey?
Greetings,
Patrick
Op 19 jul. 2012 14:42 schreef Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com
het volgende:
Hi all,
this package is required for the forthcoming Fedora audio spin. Would be
great to get this reviewed before the Spin review.
Hello!
2012/7/19 Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com:
Hey,
I will take this.
I'm faster than you! :)
Could you take devtodo2 or prey?
I'll take a look.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 07/19/2012 02:50 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello!
2012/7/19 Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com:
Hey,
I will take this.
I'm faster than you! :)
Could you take devtodo2 or prey?
I'll take a look.
Thanks Peter!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi.
The link is :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=832353perl-Net-Dropbox-API
I can review a package in C/C++, Perl or Python.
robin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
I'm new to fedora devel, so please forgive me if I'm not following the right
procedure.
I'm offering a review swap for python-rtkit[1] - Python Api for Request
Tracker's REST interface.
As I'm not a packager yet, I can only offer informal review.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
I have three package reviews up, but would like to minimally get the one
for perl-qpid [1] reviewed if someone wants to do a swap.
[1] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834070
--
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/22/2012 03:44 PM, Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi all,
I've just packaged tntnet - A web application server for web
applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821224
tntnet is needed for vdr-live - An interactive web interface for
Am Montag, den 25.06.2012, 17:34 +0700 schrieb Michel Alexandre Salim:
On 06/22/2012 03:44 PM, Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi all,
I've just packaged tntnet - A web application server for web
applications. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821224
tntnet is needed for vdr-live - An
On 2012-06-25 19:26, Martin Gansser wrote:
Sorry, I can't review your package, because i have no expierence in
reviewing packages.
The only way to gain that experience is to do it. Just go ahead!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi all,
I've just packaged tntnet - A web application server for web applications.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821224
tntnet is needed for vdr-live - An interactive web interface for VDR
can someone review this package ?
thanks
Martin
--
devel mailing list
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 02:39:07PM +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
It consists of 8 packages, and there are two more (seivot, for
benchmarking, and summain, for generating diff-able file
manifests) that I have not packaged yet, all eight are in Bugzilla,
in descending order
Hi All,
I am trying to clean up the papi package. The papi package currently bundles
the libpfm sources with in it. I would like to split libpfm out into a separate
package to follow the Fedora packaging guidelines. There have been some
comments on package in the bz, but need to get the
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:44 AM, William Cohen wco...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to clean up the papi package. The papi package currently bundles
the libpfm sources with in it. I would like to split libpfm out into a
separate package to follow the Fedora packaging guidelines.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Accidentally sent the earlier message to the old Red Hat-hosted devel
list.
- Original Message
Subject: Review swap requests for Lars Wirzenius' new Obnam backup tool
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 13:45:12 +0700
From: Michel Alexandre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2012 01:45 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Hi all,
I've just packaged Obnam, Lars Wirzenius' new B-tree-based backup
tool (think btrfs for backup), whose 1.0 release was recently
announced on Linux Weekly News on Friday, June 1st:
If anyone would be so kind, I'd be happy to review one of yours if you
review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821838
Thanks!
-J
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
Anyone willing to review some of these packages?
I'll do some reviews in exchange.
Those are really easy packages; I need to close those down before
introducing additional reviews or I'll start doing mistakes
everywhere.
Guacamole stack:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820561
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone willing to review some of these packages?
I'll do some reviews in exchange.
[snip]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820542
I'll take this one. Can you review
Review taken!
I'm in switzerland, so leaving anytime soon. Please excuse me if I
come back to the review monday morning.
Thanks,
--Simone
On 11 May 2012 16:02, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone willing
Hello, I have a pending review request of arm, a utility to monitor the
status of Tor routers. It's almost finished, as Spot has helped me with
this package.
I will take one of yours for this one.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756445
Thanks!
--
devel mailing list
On 04/24/2012 02:37 PM, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
Hello, I have a pending review request of arm, a utility to monitor the
status of Tor routers. It's almost finished, as Spot has helped me with
this package.
I will take one of yours for this one.
2012/4/24 Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com
On 04/24/2012 02:37 PM, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
Hello, I have a pending review request of arm, a utility to monitor the
status of Tor routers. It's almost finished, as Spot has helped me with
this package.
I will take one of yours for this
hi,
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda callka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 09:28 +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
hello,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com
lzip just split out lziprecover. If someone would be so kind as to do
this quick review, I'll take one in return.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803018
Thanks!
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
lzip just split out lziprecover. If someone would be so kind as to do
this quick review, I'll take one in return.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803018
I'll take it.
Here's my only open review for Fedora:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote:
lzip just split out lziprecover. If someone would be so kind as to do
this quick review, I'll take one in return.
Hi,
I would appreciate a review of this hack n slash RPG game. Everything FOSS:
GPLv3+ code and CC-BY-SA assets. sumwars.org for more info.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801092
I am not a sponsor so I can only swap with you if you already are a Fedora
packager.
--
Martin
On 03/12/2012 04:22 PM, Martin Preisler wrote:
Hi,
I would appreciate a review of this hack n slash RPG game. Everything FOSS:
GPLv3+ code and CC-BY-SA assets. sumwars.org for more info.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801092
I am not a sponsor so I can only swap with you if you
Looks interesting, I am reviewing your package.
--
Martin Preisler
- Original Message -
From: Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 4:26:34 PM
Subject: Re: Review swap: Summoning Wars
On 03/12/2012 04:22 PM, Martin
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:22:05 -0400,
Martin Preisler mprei...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I would appreciate a review of this hack n slash RPG game. Everything FOSS:
GPLv3+ code and CC-BY-SA assets. sumwars.org for more info.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801092
I am not a
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 23:46:58 +, SB (Sérgio) wrote:
Hi,
I'd like that someone sponsor me, to reinsert smb4k in Fedora.
I have follow upstream and update the package to last stable version.
The .spec is just an update of previous version, so should be easy to
review , or is already
As smb4k is a KDE Platform based app, I can also help with review,
just we will have to find a sponsor.
Also please go through the current packaging guidelines as Michael
already pointed you to it.
Jaroslav
- Original Message -
Hi,
I'd like that someone sponsor me, to reinsert smb4k
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:35:09AM +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
I would like for a review swap for the following packages. They are
sugar activities.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795069
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700
I'll have a go :-)
Could you
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:35:09AM +0530, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
I would like for a review swap for the following packages. They are
sugar activities.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795069
https
Hi,
I'd like that someone sponsor me, to reinsert smb4k in Fedora.
I have follow upstream and update the package to last stable version.
The .spec is just an update of previous version, so should be easy to
review , or is already reviewed .
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799651
Hi,
I would like for a review swap for the following packages. They are
sugar activities.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795069
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700
--
Best Regards,
Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda
http://about.me/callkalpa
--
devel mailing list
devel
On 03/04/2012 06:04 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hey folks,
A package that we'd like to use for fedora videos requires review:
I'm curious what you mean by 'fedora videos review'... could you explain
more?
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 08:18 -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 03/04/2012 06:04 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hey folks,
A package that we'd like to use for fedora videos requires review:
I'm curious what you mean by 'fedora videos review'... could you explain
more?
The package is
Ankur Sinha wrote:
The package is required for Fedora videos[1] :)
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Video
How does a keylogger help you upload videos to the Internet Archive?
Björn Persson
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 00:35 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
Ankur Sinha wrote:
The package is required for Fedora videos[1] :)
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Video
How does a keylogger help you upload videos to the Internet Archive?
Björn Persson
Will assist in the creation of
Hey folks,
A package that we'd like to use for fedora videos requires review:
Review Request: logkeys - Linux keylogger [1]
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799701
I'll be happy to review a package in return.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: FranciscoD
On 03/04/2012 02:04 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hey folks,
A package that we'd like to use for fedora videos requires review:
Review Request: logkeys - Linux keylogger [1]
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799701
I'll be happy to review a package in return.
I'll take it if you can
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:12 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
I'll take it if you can pick up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784605
thanks
Brendan
Sure! Taken! :)
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: FranciscoD
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:12 +0100, Brendan Jones wrote:
I'll take it if you can pick up
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784605
thanks
Brendan
Hey Brendan,
It's already assigned to someone. Got another one I could take? :)
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: FranciscoD
On 02/07/2012 10:16 AM, Jerry James wrote:
Is anyone up for a review swap? I need a review for lrslib:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723752.
Thanks,
I'll bite. I have two, take your pick:
ibutils - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773485
ibsim - https
Is anyone up for a review swap? I need a review for lrslib:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723752.
Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi Pavel,
Ok :-)
On Feb 5, 2012 8:16 PM, Pavel Alexeev fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
Hello, Nikos.
I'm ready swap to httpd-itk package -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860
04.02.2012 00:42, Nikos Roussos wrote:
I'd like a review about sparkleshare package:
Hello, Nikos.
I'm ready swap to httpd-itk package -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860
04.02.2012 00:42, Nikos Roussos wrote:
I'd like a review about sparkleshare package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787293
Does somebody like to swap reviews?
Thanks in
I'd like a review about sparkleshare package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787293
Does somebody like to swap reviews?
Thanks in advance
--
Nikos Roussos
about http://autoverse.net/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello,
I'd like to get ahead with wxpropgrid, as it blocks another package.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767082
Does somebody like to swap reviews?
Thanks in advance,
Volker
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Volker Froehlich volke...@gmx.at wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to get ahead with wxpropgrid, as it blocks another package.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767082
Does somebody like to swap reviews?
Thanks in advance,
Volker
Well, it would make
Greetings,
I'm in the process of updating the existing mediawiki-semantic package.
The new version of mediawiki-semantic adds a dependency on an unpackaged
extension: Validator. Anyone interested in a review swap?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784008
Thanks,
James
signature.asc
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:11:17AM -0500, James Laska wrote:
Greetings,
I'm in the process of updating the existing mediawiki-semantic package.
The new version of mediawiki-semantic adds a dependency on an unpackaged
extension: Validator. Anyone interested in a review swap?
https
701 - 800 of 886 matches
Mail list logo
