Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-11)

2015-07-13 Thread Adam Huffman
BEDToolsverdurin 60 weeks ago This has an annoying 'shrank by one' debuginfo problem and further problems on 32-bit with recent GCC, but it is building on x86_64 now. A bug has been filed regarding the problems and I'm pursuing them upstream. Adam --

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-11)

2015-07-13 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 13.07.2015 um 17:23 schrieb Erik Johnson: Is yum-utils going away, with dnf taking over? looks so - it makes me so terrible angry that we have to face eacg year half done replacements of perfectly fine things [root@rawhide ~]# package-cleanup --leaves Yum-utils package has been deprecat

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-11)

2015-07-13 Thread Erik Johnson
Is yum-utils going away, with dnf taking over? -- Erik Johnson | Senior Engineer 3400 North Ashton Blvd, Suite 110 | Lehi, UT 84043 e...@saltstack.com | http://saltstack.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproje

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-11)

2015-07-13 Thread Matthias Runge
On 11/07/15 17:24, Haïkel wrote: I fixed python-autopep8 as provenpackager. Thank you! I had it on my plate and wanted to look at it today, observing it was fixed already :D Matthias -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel F

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-11)

2015-07-12 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:09:05 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: nethack-vulturesbruno 60 weeks ago nethack-vultures is now rebuilt in rawhide, f22 and f21. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-11)

2015-07-11 Thread Will Benton
I pushed fixes for Scala on F22 and rawhide and for SBT on F22 last week and am working on fixing SBT for F23. Once this is taken care of, I'll be able to fix the other Scala ecosystem projects pretty quickly, although I am likely to retire some packages where the upstream source has diverged t

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-11)

2015-07-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:09:05 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: nethack-vulturesbruno 60 weeks ago This one is mainly due to string format warnings, most of which are false positives. I got about half way through in about 4 hours. Most likely I'll

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-11)

2015-07-11 Thread Haïkel
I fixed python-autopep8 as provenpackager. python-umemcache should be dropped, it has not been updated upstream since 2013, it doesn't support python3, and nothing requires it. Regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-11)

2015-07-11 Thread opensource
The following packages did not build for two releases and should be retired when Fedora (F23) is branched, unless someone takes care of them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end