On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:30:13PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 15:28 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 15:23 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Miller
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +, Z
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:23:23PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink.
> >> If prelink goe
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:41:12AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 07/27/2015 10:31 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >That would work too, although more packages would have to be updated.
> >But they probably should be updated to Require /usr/bin/execstack
> >anyway, so that's fine.
Orion Poplawski schrieb am Di., 28. Juli 2015 um
01:31 Uhr:
> On 07/27/2015 12:15 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 07/27/2015 01:51 AM, Thomas Spura wrote:
> >> mailto:opensou...@till.name>> schrieb am Mo.,
> 27. Juli
> >> 2015 um 09:19 Uhr:
> >>
> >> The following packages did not build for
On 07/27/2015 12:15 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 07/27/2015 01:51 AM, Thomas Spura wrote:
>> mailto:opensou...@till.name>> schrieb am Mo., 27. Juli
>> 2015 um 09:19 Uhr:
>>
>> The following packages did not build for two releases and will be
>> retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless som
On 07/27/2015 01:51 AM, Thomas Spura wrote:
> mailto:opensou...@till.name>> schrieb am Mo., 27. Juli
> 2015 um 09:19 Uhr:
>
> The following packages did not build for two releases and will be
> retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you
> know
> for
On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 17:18 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 07:19 +, opensou...@till.name wrote:
> > opengrok lkundrak 62 weeks ago
>
> Patch in attach :
> Update to 0.12.1.5 .
>
> - Update Source0 URL to github.
> - Drop lucene35 patch, ups
On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 07:19 +, opensou...@till.name wrote:
> opengrok lkundrak 62 weeks ago
Patch in attach :
Update to 0.12.1.5 .
- Update Source0 URL to github.
- Drop lucene35 patch, upstream source changed a lot.
- Drop jflex patch, it was just one comment
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:19:06 +,
opensou...@till.name wrote:
The following packages did not build for two releases and will be
retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you know
Package (co)maintainers Status Change
===
On 07/27/2015 10:31 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
That would work too, although more packages would have to be updated.
But they probably should be updated to Require /usr/bin/execstack
anyway, so that's fine.
It would be great if binutils would take it. Anyone mind pinging upstream ab
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:29:41AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:28:20PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > So... execstack builds fine from prelink.rpm. prelink itself does not
> > build because it wants to link various libraries statically.
> > What about re
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:28:20PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> So... execstack builds fine from prelink.rpm. prelink itself does not
> build because it wants to link various libraries statically.
> What about restoring the prelink package, but only to provide
> /usr/bin/execstack?
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:19:06 +,
opensou...@till.name wrote:
The following packages did not build for two releases and will be
retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you know
Package (co)maintainers Status Change
===
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:47:40AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:23:23PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > From dealing with this for arch bringups I know there are quite a few,
> > but likely in the high teens/low 20s in number, of packages that use
> > execstack. Not su
On Monday 27 July 2015 07:19:06 opensou...@till.name wrote:
> emacs-common-ess alexlan 62 weeks ago
I rebuilt emacs-common-ess for rawhide, and I am doing the same for f23.
In the process I have obsoleted the xemacs sub-packages since the build process
fails and upstrea
Dne 27.7.2015 v 16:44 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires prelink
dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src
--whatrequires prelink
While the --disable/enablerepo should be possible to replace just by
--repo, but t
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:23:23PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> From dealing with this for arch bringups I know there are quite a few,
> but likely in the high teens/low 20s in number, of packages that use
> execstack. Not sure what feature it provides as I've never been
> bothered enough to look
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:28:55PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> we can query buildrequires:
> repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires prelink
Any idea how to do this with DNF?
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 27/07/15 15:23, Peter Robinson wrote:
From dealing with this for arch bringups I know there are quite a few,
but likely in the high teens/low 20s in number, of packages that use
execstack. Not sure what feature it provides as I've never been
bothered enough to look into it but it's generally
On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 15:28 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 15:23 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Miller
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
> > >> A bunch of packages depe
On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 15:23 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink.
> >> If prelink goes away,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink.
>> If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is
>> the plan here? Can we mov
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:17:42AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink.
> > If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is
> > the plan here?
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink.
> If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is
> the plan here? Can we move execstack somewhere else, or is
> there a replacement tool?
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:56:22PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 27.07.2015 um 15:00 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> >>prelinkorphan0 weeks ago
> >A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink.
> >If prelink goes away, they'll
Am 27.07.2015 um 15:00 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
prelinkorphan0 weeks ago
A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink.
If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is
the plan here? Can we move execstack somewhe
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:19:06AM +, opensou...@till.name wrote:
> The following packages did not build for two releases and will be
> retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you
> know
> for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a prope
schrieb am Mo., 27. Juli 2015 um 09:19 Uhr:
> The following packages did not build for two releases and will be
> retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you
> know
> for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
> reason:
> https://fed
The following packages did not build for two releases and will be
retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you know
for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
29 matches
Mail list logo
