Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:26:11PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: Orphan tetex-tex4ht Taken. Jindrich -- Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá, kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte bič a hůl, to není člověk, to je vůl. --- Jan Werich -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal
Dne 23.2.2011 23:26, Bill Nottingham napsal(a): Orphan rubygem-eventmachine Orphan rubygem-fastthread comaintained by: kanarip Orphan rubygem-gem_plugin Orphan rubygem-mongrel comaintained by: kanarip I took these Vit -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal
On 24 February 2011 04:20, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: On 02/23/2011 05:26 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Orphan glib-java Orphan libgconf-java Orphan libglade-java Orphan libgnome-java Orphan libgtk-java Orphan libvte-java We should consider flushing all of these along with frysk (or, if frysk is still maintained, having that maintainer take these). I'm 99% sure that all of these ancient GNOME Java bits are only being used by frysk, and they would still be broken if I hadn't applied copious duct tape to them twice now. But I really don't want them. ~tom A bunch of gnome and freedesktop java bindings were superseded by the java-gnome package. If frysk is still maintained, it should be ported to use java-gnome so we can retire the old bindings. -- Mat Booth http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 23:26, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Orphan python-flickrapi I'll take that one. Maxim Burgerhout ma...@wzzrd.com EB11 5E56 E648 9D99 E8EF 05FB C513 6FD4 1302 B48A () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
apel - emacs-apel (was: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal)
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:46:09 +0900 (JST), Akira wrote: BN Orphan: apel BN ddskk requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN emacs-common-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN emacs-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN flim requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN migemo-emacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN migemo-xemacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 apel has just been renamed to emacs-apel because of the naming guidelines. the above packages has to be rebuilt against emacs-apel instead of apel. When renaming a package you would normally add a good Obsoletes/Provides pair for the old name and drop that only after an appropriate period of time (e.g. 2-3 dist releases). Has that been done for apel? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: apel - emacs-apel (was: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal)
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:45:54 +0100, Michael wrote: On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:46:09 +0900 (JST), Akira wrote: BN Orphan: apel BN ddskk requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN emacs-common-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN emacs-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN flim requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN migemo-emacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN migemo-xemacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 apel has just been renamed to emacs-apel because of the naming guidelines. the above packages has to be rebuilt against emacs-apel instead of apel. When renaming a package you would normally add a good Obsoletes/Provides pair for the old name and drop that only after an appropriate period of time (e.g. 2-3 dist releases). Has that been done for apel? $ repoquery --whatprovides apel apel-0:10.7-4.fc12.noarch emacs-apel-0:10.8-1.fc14.noarch apel-0:10.7-4.fc12.noarch What do the other packages require a specific VR of apel? Is that necessary or just too strict? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal
Orphan: beagle kerry requires beagle = 0.3.9-19.fc14 I'll take beagle -- Henrique LonelySpooky Junior -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: apel - emacs-apel (was: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal)
Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said: On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:45:54 +0100, Michael wrote: On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:46:09 +0900 (JST), Akira wrote: BN Orphan: apel BN ddskk requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN emacs-common-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN emacs-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN flim requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN migemo-emacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN migemo-xemacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 apel has just been renamed to emacs-apel because of the naming guidelines. the above packages has to be rebuilt against emacs-apel instead of apel. When renaming a package you would normally add a good Obsoletes/Provides pair for the old name and drop that only after an appropriate period of time (e.g. 2-3 dist releases). Has that been done for apel? $ repoquery --whatprovides apel apel-0:10.7-4.fc12.noarch emacs-apel-0:10.8-1.fc14.noarch apel-0:10.7-4.fc12.noarch What do the other packages require a specific VR of apel? Is that necessary or just too strict? I believe it's just an artifact of the script that checks for requires; if something else provides apel, we can drop the original apel package. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 17:26 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: Orphan: gdk-pixbuf freetennis requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12 soundtracker requires libgdk_pixbuf.so.2 soundtracker requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12 tracker requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12 viking requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12 xmms-xosd requires libgdk_pixbuf.so.2 xosd requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12 xqf requires gdk-pixbuf = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12 zathura requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12 soundtracker-0.6.8-11.fc15 without gdk-pixbuf is waiting to be moved from testing to stable. So from the soundtracker point of view, gdk-pixbuf can be retired. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal
On 02/23/2011 04:26 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Orphan: libsigc++ TnL requires libsigc-1.2.so.5 TnL requires libsigc++-devel = 1.2.7-9.fc15 asc requires libsigc-1.2.so.5 asc requires libsigc++-devel = 1.2.7-9.fc15 libasync requires libsigc-1.2.so.5 qtel requires libsigc-1.2.so.5 sooperlooper requires libsigc-1.2.so.5 sooperlooper requires libsigc++-devel = 1.2.7-9.fc15 svxlink requires libsigc++-devel = 1.2.7-9.fc15 svxlink-server requires libsigc-1.2.so.5 synfig requires libsigc++-devel = 1.2.7-9.fc15 Taken, since I maintain TnL. -J -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:26:11 -0500, BN == Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: BN Orphan: apel BN ddskk requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN emacs-common-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN emacs-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN flim requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN migemo-emacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN migemo-xemacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 apel has just been renamed to emacs-apel because of the naming guidelines. the above packages has to be rebuilt against emacs-apel instead of apel. -- Akira TAGOH pgpzMltmR7M8K.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal
Bill Nottingham wrote: Orphan: gdk-pixbuf freetennis requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12 tracker requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12 viking requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12 zathura requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12 All these BR gdk-pixbuf-devel without actually requiring the lib. I suspect they should actually be BRing gdk-pixbuf2-devel instead, or not BR gdk- pixbuf-devel at all. xqf requires gdk-pixbuf = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12 This one is also suspicious, no soname autoreq here either. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal
On 09:09:56 am Thursday, February 24, 2011 Bill Nottingham wrote: As part of the normal orphan removal process, 113 orphaned packages with no dependencies have been retired. However, there are still orphaned packages that have requirements on them in the F-15 tree. We would prefer not to break the requiring packages, so please claim these if your app depends on it: Orphan: pmd emacs-pmd requires pmd = 4.2.5-9.fc15 maven-pmd-plugin requires pmd = 4.2.5-9.fc15 xemacs-pmd requires pmd = 4.2.5-9.fc15 I took pmd because of maven-pmd-plugin which I maintain. Alexander Kurtakov -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
