Re: [Container-sig] About Fedora containers

2022-07-01 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 08:57:24AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Note that this is just moving things in our registry over there and > pointing everyone to it so we can get out of the registry business, we > haven't looked at building the containers there or the like. We are > hoping osbuilder will

Re: [Container-sig] About Fedora containers

2022-06-24 Thread Blaise Pabon
Sorry, I read this as becoming dependent on GitHub actions for CI and for CD. On Thu, Jun 23, 2022, 4:24 PM Maxwell G via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Thursday, June 23, 2022 1:50:09 PM CDT Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Not sure what github has to do with things here? > > Lumír

Re: [Container-sig] About Fedora containers

2022-06-23 Thread Maxwell G via devel
On Thursday, June 23, 2022 1:50:09 PM CDT Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Not sure what github has to do with things here? Lumír said: > With quay.io, we are able to produce new container images directly from > Github CI and rebuild them regularly without complicated update process > and without any need

Re: [Container-sig] About Fedora containers

2022-06-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 09:11:13AM -0400, Blaise Pabon wrote: > I wonder if, rather than Github, we should consider a more "open source" > toolchain, eg opendev.org, gitlab, etc. to be more consistent with > Fedora's "free" vision? Not sure what github has to do with things here? quay is open

Re: [Container-sig] About Fedora containers

2022-06-23 Thread Blaise Pabon
I wonder if, rather than Github, we should consider a more "open source" toolchain, eg opendev.org, gitlab, etc. to be more consistent with Fedora's "free" vision? On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:57 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 03:41:47PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon,

Re: [Container-sig] About Fedora containers

2022-06-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 03:41:47PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:21:48AM +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote: > > Because we had a lot of troubles with Fedora infra for container > > images (I can provide more details, if you want), we have decided to > > move our containers to

Re: [Container-sig] About Fedora containers

2022-06-22 Thread Daniel Walsh
On 6/22/22 10:04, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:21:48AM +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote: Hello. Because we had a lot of troubles with Fedora infra for container images (I can provide more details, if you want), we have decided to move our containers to

Re: [Container-sig] About Fedora containers

2022-06-22 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:21:48AM +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote: > Hello. > > Because we had a lot of troubles with Fedora infra for container images (I > can provide more details, if you want), we have decided to move our > containers to https://quay.io/organization/fedora. So are you saying that

Re: [Container-sig] About Fedora containers

2022-06-22 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 3:42 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:21:48AM +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote: > > Because we had a lot of troubles with Fedora infra for container > > images (I can provide more details, if you want), we have decided to > > move our containers to

Re: [Container-sig] About Fedora containers

2022-06-21 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 08:21:48AM +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote: > Because we had a lot of troubles with Fedora infra for container > images (I can provide more details, if you want), we have decided to > move our containers to https://quay.io/organization/fedora. I wonder if we should just... make

Re: [Container-sig] About Fedora containers

2022-06-20 Thread Lumír Balhar
Hello. Because we had a lot of troubles with Fedora infra for container images (I can provide more details, if you want), we have decided to move our containers to https://quay.io/organization/fedora. With quay.io, we are able to produce new container images directly from Github CI and