On 07/22/2011 10:33 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
The rpm changelog can reasonably be in any timezone.
It is better to always write the changelog timestamp in UTC to avoid
%changelog not in descending chronological order build errors if the
specfile is modified at unfortunate moments in different
Hi list,
I recently ran into an interesting problem related to time zone.
I live in time zone GMT+10.
On 0:10, 18th July,
I wrote my changelog as:
* Mon Jul 18 2011 ..
And then run rpmlint, which give me:
packageName: E: changelog-time-in-future 2011-07-18
So I am wondering which one
Ding Yi Chen wrote:
Hi list,
I recently ran into an interesting problem related to time zone.
I live in time zone GMT+10.
On 0:10, 18th July,
I wrote my changelog as:
* Mon Jul 18 2011 ..
And then run rpmlint, which give me:
packageName: E: changelog-time-in-future 2011-07-18
Dne 22.7.2011 14:31, Dmitry Butskoy napsal(a):
Ding Yi Chen wrote:
Hi list,
I recently ran into an interesting problem related to time zone.
I live in time zone GMT+10.
On 0:10, 18th July,
I wrote my changelog as:
* Mon Jul 18 2011 ..
And then run rpmlint, which give me:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:34:45PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 22.7.2011 14:31, Dmitry Butskoy napsal(a):
Ding Yi Chen wrote:
Hi list,
I recently ran into an interesting problem related to time zone.
I live in time zone GMT+10.
On 0:10, 18th July,
I wrote my changelog as:
* Mon
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 03:27:58PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:34:45PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 22.7.2011 14:31, Dmitry Butskoy napsal(a):
Ding Yi Chen wrote:
Hi list,
I recently ran into an interesting problem related to time zone.
I live in time
