On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 11:51, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
Do we need to tell upstream about these patches?
Yes, it's part of maintainer responsibilities.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
Faith manages.
--
Do we need to tell upstream about these patches?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Wednesday, 25 February 2015 at 18:03, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
domi...@greysector.net wrote:
Affected packages:
IQmol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196090
avogadro
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
domi...@greysector.net wrote:
Affected packages:
IQmol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196090
avogadro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196090
Are avogadro and IQmol affected by the same bug, or was
Dear packagers,
On Sunday, 08 February 2015 at 01:06, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
I intend to update openbabel to pre-2.4 (current Git master) in rawhide
in a few weeks.
This has now landed in rawhide only. I tried rebuilding all packages
that have a build dependency on openbabel. I
