Re: [dnf] dnf-0.3.6-1

2013-05-29 Thread Ales Kozumplik
On 05/28/2013 07:30 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: If you store the results, you would only need to get the details of the bugs fixed from the last release. And that is practically doable: http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/release_notes.html Thanks, Ales -- devel mailing list

Re: [dnf] dnf-0.3.6-1

2013-05-29 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Ales Kozumplik wrote: On 05/28/2013 07:30 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: If you store the results, you would only need to get the details of the bugs fixed from the last release. And that is practically doable:

Re: [dnf] dnf-0.3.6-1

2013-05-28 Thread Miroslav Suchý
On 05/27/2013 03:24 PM, Ales Kozumplik wrote: Hi, There's a new build of DNF for Fedora rawhide and F19's updates-testing[1] today. 0.3.6 is almost only a bugfix release, but note that F19 users didn't get 0.3.5 so there's more changes happening there. Also see the release notes[2]. In past

Re: [dnf] dnf-0.3.6-1

2013-05-28 Thread Ales Kozumplik
On 05/28/2013 01:19 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: In past dnf had problem upgrading kernel, so I always upgraded kernel using yum and rest of system using dnf. I know that recently you fixed two bugs related to upgrading kernel. But is it all? Can I now trust dnf even for kernel upgrades? Or there

Re: [dnf] dnf-0.3.6-1

2013-05-28 Thread Ales Kozumplik
On 05/27/2013 09:14 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Might use python-bugzilla to extend it, I guess The speed of bugzilla.redhat.com is prohibiting, the following takes 3 seconds on my machine: #! /usr/bin/python2.7 import bugzilla rhbz =

Re: [dnf] dnf-0.3.6-1

2013-05-28 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Ales Kozumplik wrote: That would slow the build down by 5 minutes for 100 bugs and go up with each release. If you store the results, you would only need to get the details of the bugs fixed from the last release. Rahul -- devel mailing list

Re: [dnf] dnf-0.3.6-1

2013-05-27 Thread Christopher Meng
I still cannot see each package's size, they all are 0. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [dnf] dnf-0.3.6-1

2013-05-27 Thread Aleš Kozumplík
On 05/27/2013 05:57 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: I still cannot see each package's size, they all are 0. What bug is this? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [dnf] dnf-0.3.6-1

2013-05-27 Thread Aleš Kozumplík
On 05/27/2013 05:44 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Would it be possible to put the bug report titles alongside the bug report themselves? Otherwise, one has to click through every bug report just to summarize what has changed. Thanks! If there's a sphinx plugin to do that let me know. I currently

Re: [dnf] dnf-0.3.6-1

2013-05-27 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 05/27/2013 02:43 PM, Aleš Kozumplík wrote: If there's a sphinx plugin to do that let me know. I currently use this: https://github.com/akozumpl/dnf/blob/master/doc/rhbug.py and would have to extend it with bugzilla RPC or copy-paste each title manually. Might use python-bugzilla to