Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

2020-07-01 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 7/1/20 4:09 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:00 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: >> >> On 7/1/20 3:21 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov >>> wrote: Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

2020-07-01 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:00 PM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > On 7/1/20 3:21 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov > > wrote: > >> > >> Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the > >> Change to Java 11 as a default? > > > >

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

2020-07-01 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 7/1/20 3:21 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov > wrote: >> >> Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the >> Change to Java 11 as a default? > > Speaking for myself, yes. > > I can't speak for all other SIG members (we

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

2020-07-01 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:50 PM Alex Scheel wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Fabio Valentini" > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 9:21:31 AM > > Subject: Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead,

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

2020-07-01 Thread Alex Scheel
- Original Message - > From: "Fabio Valentini" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 9:21:31 AM > Subject: Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack > (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with > java-11-openjdk as

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

2020-07-01 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the Change > to Java 11 as a default? Speaking for myself, yes. I can't speak for all other SIG members (we haven't formally voted on this or something like that),

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

2020-07-01 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the Change to Java 11 as a default? On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:02 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 9:52 AM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > > > On 6/29/20 1:59 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

2020-07-01 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 9:52 AM Jiri Vanek wrote: > > On 6/29/20 1:59 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Jiri Vanek > > wrote: > > > > Current stats from my testing samples: > > 408 failing > > 263 passing > > > > > >

Re: [fedora-java] Re: java stack is dead, long live the javastack (was "500 packages FTBFS in rawhide with java-11-openjdk as system JDK")

2020-06-30 Thread Jiri Vanek
On 6/29/20 1:59 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 2:39 PM Jiri Vanek > wrote: > > Current stats from my testing samples: > 408 failing > 263 passing > > > Are these numbers reversed ^^^ ? Looking at >