Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Jerry James wrote: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko > wrote: >> If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list >> or anything else -- please let me know. >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 2018-02-18 11:09, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to > random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors found by analyzing > hundreds of

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 2018-02-18 09:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having > gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due > to random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors found by analyzing > hundreds of

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 7:08 AM, Jan Rybar wrote: > done: procps-ng, psmisc, psacct > > > On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc >> and

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

done: procps-ng, psmisc, psacct On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to random reasons and

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Hi, I fixed all my packages. my package list: google-noto-emoji-fonts ibus-libpinyin ibus-libzhuyin ibus-pinyin ibus-rime libpinyin librime libthai opencc pyzy scim scim-bridge scim-fcitx scim-pinyin scim-thai sunpinyin zinnia Thanks, Peng Wu On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 1:09 AM, Igor

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

- Original Message - > From: "Igor Gnatenko" > To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2018 6:09:40 PM > Subject: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++ > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list > or anything else -- please let me know. Fixed: abc, gnofract4d, libedit, lrslib. The abe package does not actually need a

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

fixed in sox, passwd, and usermode ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 21:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit : > On 28 February 2018 at 10:03, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le 2018-02-28 15:28, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit : > > > > > > On 28 February 2018 at 09:19, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > > > > These are all _very_ edge use-cases. > > > >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 28 February 2018 at 11:37, Björn Persson wrote: > Orcan Ogetbil wrote: >> Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++? >> What good is a header package without a compiler anyway? >> This would also (indirectly) pull in the compiler and fix most of

Re: Re: Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 28 February 2018 at 10:03, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le 2018-02-28 15:28, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit : >> >> On 28 February 2018 at 09:19, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > >> These are all _very_ edge use-cases. > > > Those are *not* edge-cases. We have a few thousand build failures. If you cannot find as

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

> "OO" == Orcan Ogetbil writes: OO> Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++? OO> What good is a header package without a compiler anyway? You could argue whether they're useful without a compiler, but they are certainly useful without gcc.

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 16:51 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 18.2.2018 v 18:09 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a): > > > > List of packages and respective maintainers: > > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt > > Igor, you will fix my packages isn't it ? Thanks, -- Sérgio M.

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++? > What good is a header package without a compiler anyway? > This would also (indirectly) pull in the compiler and fix most of > these failed builds. Do you mean that maintainers

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Dne 18.2.2018 v 18:09 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a): > > List of packages and respective maintainers: > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt > xchat-ruby was retired. ruby and rubygem-bcrypt are fixed (at least in git). Vít signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: Re: Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Le 2018-02-28 16:03, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : Most system libraries are written in C/C++ so pretty much all the language toolchains we ship (except for toy languages not intended to produce complex apps) will read C/C++ header files from their compilers to use those system libraries, and will

Re: Re: Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Le 2018-02-28 15:28, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit : On 28 February 2018 at 09:19, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: These are all _very_ edge use-cases. Those are *not* edge-cases. Most system libraries are written in C/C++ so pretty much all the language toolchains we ship (except for toy languages not

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 02/18/2018 07:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to random reasons and I grepped all logs for some

Re: Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 02/28/2018 04:28 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On 28 February 2018 at 09:19, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: My point was *non-C-compilers* can read *C/C++* header files because they need to read the ABI definitions to use it from their non C/C++ code. That makes a C/C++ header file consumable by pretty

Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 02/28/2018 11:28 AM, Rafal Luzynski wrote: 28.02.2018 09:33 Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 00:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit : Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++? What good is a header package without a

Re: Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 28 February 2018 at 09:19, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > My point was *non-C-compilers* can read *C/C++* header files because they > need to read the ABI definitions to use it from their non C/C++ code. > > That makes a C/C++ header file consumable by pretty much any kind of > compiler, so it's

Re: Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

My point was *non-C-compilers* can read *C/C++* header files because they need to read the ABI definitions to use it from their non C/C++ code. That makes a C/C++ header file consumable by pretty much any kind of compiler, so it's *completely useless* to try to make C/C++ devel packages pull

Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 28 February 2018 at 05:28, Rafal Luzynski wrote: > 28.02.2018 09:33 Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> >> Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 00:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit : >> > >> > Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++? >> > What good is a header package without a

Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

28.02.2018 09:33 Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 00:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit : > > > > Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++? > > What good is a header package without a compiler anyway? > > This would also

Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 00:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit : > > Shouldn't we consider having -devel packages Require gcc or gcc-c++? > What good is a header package without a compiler anyway? > This would also (indirectly) pull in the compiler and fix most of > these failed builds. > gcc

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 18 February 2018 at 12:09, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to > random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors found by analyzing >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Better late then never, vsqlite++ updated and rebuilt On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 11:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 10:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Will you be doing such rebuild every

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 11:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 10:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Will you be doing such rebuild every weekend to track the progress? > > ;) > > My plan is to do this bi-weekly ;) So this weekend then. Hello, So I made a fix for clamsmtp, and

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Fixed smaclient. Att. -- Rafael Fonseca ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Hi, Le 18/02/2018 à 18:09, Igor Gnatenko a écrit : If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list or anything else -- please let me know. I've fixed : nsca openalchemist perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII perl-Linux-Pid perl-Unicode-LineBreak toppler Regards, Xavier

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Hi, Le 18/02/2018 à 18:09, Igor Gnatenko a écrit : If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list or anything else -- please let me know. I fixed : nsca openalchemist perl-Encode-EUCJPASCII perl-Linux-Pid perl-Unicode-LineBreak toppler Regards, Xavier

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 10:47 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Will you be doing such rebuild every weekend to track the progress? > ;) My plan is to do this bi-weekly ;) So this weekend then. - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Will you be doing such rebuild every weekend to track the progress? ;) V. Dne 18.2.2018 v 18:09 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a): > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having > gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due > to random > reasons

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sat, 2018-02-24 at 16:40 +0100, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > Hi > > On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko project.org> wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without > > having

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

I've fixed disktype, ncdu, and whowatch in rawhide. Thanks for generating the list! Regards, Rich -- Richard Fearn richardfe...@gmail.com ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

I fixed ipvsadm and keepalived. I will also fix foghorn, but I am strongly considering retiring this package. Did this need fixed in the 'f28' branch or is master (Rawhide) sufficient? Thanks. Ryan On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 02/21/2018 04:51 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: OK I understand that, but where is the cutoff. Where as a packager should I stop adding things and expect that libsolv is going to do its job? Do I need to put in BuildRequires: kernel BuildRequires: systemd BuildRequires: bash BuildRequires:

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Hi On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc > and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

fixed g2clib and pyproj. Jos On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to > random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Hey, On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > List of packages and respective maintainers: > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt Done: gnome-session gnome-shell-extensions(*) Cheers, Florian (*) accidentally, by

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 06:09:40PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > List of packages and respective maintainers: > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt > > adeltonmod_auth_openidc mod_authnz_pam mod_intercept_form_submit > mod_lookup_identity perl-Cache-Mmap

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: The grep output is located here: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal.txt fbset should be taken care of because I had to touch the package anyway, and it has seen few actual changes over the years. Thanks, Florian

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

> "SJS" == Stephen John Smoogen writes: SJS> OK this is a problem on my part. I have taken sections which have SJS> MUST/WILL/SHOULD in them to be done and I have taken ones without SJS> that as general guidance. Unfortunately the guidelines simply do not consistently

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 22 February 2018 at 10:47, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 09:53:25AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> I am trying to figure out the special cases here. Why are some >> packages more equal than others. >> >> In the end, I am just trying to

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 18:09:40 +0100 Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having > gcc and gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which > failed

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 09:53:25AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > I am trying to figure out the special cases here. Why are some > packages more equal than others. > > In the end, I am just trying to figure out what the new "Fedora > Project Packagers License" is. Something like: > > A

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 22 February 2018 at 02:41, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 10:51 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On 21 February 2018 at 09:53, Reindl Harald >> wrote: >> > >> >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 10:51 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 21 February 2018 at 09:53, Reindl Harald > wrote: > > > > > > it's pretty easy: > > > > when you don't list your BuildRequires properly you depend on

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 21 February 2018 at 09:53, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > it's pretty easy: > > when you don't list your BuildRequires properly you depend on luck that they > are pulled by something else in the buildroot > OK I understand that, but where is the cutoff. Where as a

Re: Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Le 2018-02-21 15:28, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit : I guess the problem I am having is I have no idea what we are "fixing". It all seems like needless form filling for no benefit. If XYZ-a is always going to pull in ABC.. why are we are explicitely saying we need ABC. Is the end goal to have

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 21 February 2018 at 02:08, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:21:43PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> > List of packages and respective maintainers: >> > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt >> So this may not be all

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list or anything else -- please let me know. libbytesize fixed in rawhide ___ devel mailing list --

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 06:09:40PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > If you fixed package(s) -- please let me know. Fixed: util-linux-2.32-0.2.fc29 -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com ___ devel mailing list --

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Hi, On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages > in list > or anything else -- please let me know. Done: boost-gdb-printers cppunit libabw libcdr libcmis libcss libe-book libeot libepubgen libetonyek

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:21:43PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > List of packages and respective maintainers: > > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt > So this may not be all the packages which would need a > BuildRequires:gcc in them. I had two packages without >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 18 February 2018 at 12:09, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 00:03 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote: > On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > List of packages and respective maintainers: > > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt > > nphilipp babl dcraw gegl gimp gpsdrive gtick gtkimageview > >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 06:09:40PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > If you fixed package(s) -- please let me know. Fixed: util-linux-2.32-0.2.fc29 Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com ___ devel mailing list --

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > List of packages and respective maintainers: > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt > nphilipp babl dcraw gegl gimp gpsdrive gtick gtkimageview hydrogen jaaa lensfun libgnomecanvasmm26 libiec61883 liblo liblrdf

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list > or anything else -- please let me know. I've added the missing BuildRequires to the following packages: elog gfm hyperrogue

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list > or anything else -- please let me know. Fixed in rawhide: aspell exempi gpxsee groff joe jpilot libcgroup libpng12 libpng15 libtiff man-db pilot-link Also

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 02/20/2018 01:02 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: List of packages and respective maintainers: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt Done in packages where I am admin. TY! J. ___

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > List of packages and respective maintainers: > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt > zdohnalc2esp cups cups-filters enscript foomatic hplip jbigkit mgetty > openobex pnm2ppa ptouch-driver python-cups python-smbc qpdf

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, 18 Feb 2018, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list > or anything else -- please let me know. > Fixed ascii, hardlink, netmask, pam_usb, and reptyr. -- Francisco Javier Tsao Santín http://gattaca.es 1024D/71CF4D62 42 F1 53

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Am Sonntag, den 18.02.2018, 18:09 +0100 schrieb Igor Gnatenko: > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having > gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due > to random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors found by >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having > gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due > to random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors found by > analyzing

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Il 18/02/2018 18:09, Igor Gnatenko ha scritto: If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list or anything else -- please let me know. I've fixed libpasastro, rawtherapee and wcstools. ___ devel mailing list --

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc > and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc > and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to > random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

> On 18/02/18 18:09, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> Some packages might be missed due to short koji outage, >> broken dependencies and so on, but majority of real failures >> is below. >> >> If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing >> packages in list or anything else -- please

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

>> On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild >> > without having gcc and gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora >> > packages, many of which failed due to random reasons and >> > I grepped all logs for some common errors found

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 18/02/18 18:09, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Some packages might be missed due to short koji outage, broken dependencies and so on, but majority of real failures is below. If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list or anything else -- please let me know. I fixed

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:39 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Dne 18.2.2018 v 18:09 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a): > List of packages and respective maintainers: > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt > msuchy PyPAM imvirt obs-signd perl-Filesys-Df perl-Math-FFT rhnsd rhnsd - sent PR to upstream everything else fixed in rawhide.

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Hi, I fixed: bibutils eb emacspeak hugs98 scim-hangul wmctrl Jens ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-19 9:30 GMT+01:00 Igor Gnatenko : >> amsynth has been fixed in all supported branches. > > It should have both gcc and gcc-c++. Done, BR for both. Ciao Guido Aulisi fas account: tartina ___ devel mailing list

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 11:47 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/19/2018 11:27 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:02 +, Tom Hughes wrote: > > > On 19/02/18 08:30,

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 02/19/2018 11:27 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:02 +, Tom Hughes wrote: On 19/02/18 08:30, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:12 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: amsynth has been fixed in all supported branches.

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 11:15 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: > 2018-02-19 9:30 GMT+01:00 Igor Gnatenko : > > On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:12 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > > Hi Igor > > > > > > > 2018-02-18 18:09 GMT+01:00

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:02 +, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 19/02/18 08:30, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:12 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > > > > amsynth has been fixed in all supported branches. > > > > It should have both

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

2018-02-19 9:30 GMT+01:00 Igor Gnatenko : > On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:12 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: >> Hi Igor >> >> > 2018-02-18 18:09 GMT+01:00 Igor Gnatenko >> > : >> > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

psabatatinyfugue wmname xssstate All three fixed in Rawhide. Also added other missing build deps when I was at it :) Also tinyfugue could do with some more love. I wonder if anybody is using it in Fedora, though. P signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:02:34AM +, Tom Hughes wrote: > and gcc-c++ has to require gcc anyway. It does. Jakub ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 19/02/18 08:30, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:12 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: amsynth has been fixed in all supported branches. It should have both gcc and gcc-c++. I don't think you ever need both - the guidelines say "gcc, gcc-c++ or clang" and gcc-c++ has to require

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:12 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: > Hi Igor > > > 2018-02-18 18:09 GMT+01:00 Igor Gnatenko > > : > > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc > > and > >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Hi Igor > 2018-02-18 18:09 GMT+01:00 Igor Gnatenko : > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to > random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Le 18/02/2018 à 18:09, Igor Gnatenko a écrit : > If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in list > or anything else -- please let me know. All php-* packages (C extensions) should already be ok, BR on php-devel should be enough. Remi

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 06:09:40PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt These are fixed: flac123 fping fxload ocp perl-HTML-Strip sedutil I retired msed because sedutil replaced it. ___ devel

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 19/02/18 00:30, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: I've fixed all my packages except simspark & rcssserver3d, which seem to crash on i686 when generating docs using pdflatex, which will probably needs a fix in TeXLive. Yes that's the crash that is blocking me as well... It is new since the texlive

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Hi, I've fixed all my packages except simspark & rcssserver3d, which seem to crash on i686 when generating docs using pdflatex, which will probably needs a fix in TeXLive. Regards, Hedayat /*Igor Gnatenko*/ wrote on Sun, 18 Feb 2018 18:09:40 +0100: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash:

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 18 February 2018 at 20:52, Igor Gnatenko wrote: [..] >> Yesterday I've replayed on your proposal but I've not realized that my >> reply was held by the moderator. >> You started introducing changes only after less than 24h after >> publishing proposal. >> It

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On dimanche 18 février 2018 18:09:40 CET Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc > and gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due > to random reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors found by >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 20:45 +, Philip Kovacs wrote: > Ok, my configure.ac initializes libtool with both c and c++ : > LT_INIT()LT_LANG([C])LT_LANG([C++]) > where only C is needed. There are no ill-effects other than producing some > noise in

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 20:36 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 18 February 2018 at 17:09, Igor Gnatenko > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Over this weekend I've performed

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Ok, my configure.ac initializes libtool with both c and c++ : LT_INIT()LT_LANG([C])LT_LANG([C++]) where only C is needed.   There are no ill-effects other than producing some noise in the configureoutput, but I will patch out the LT_LANG([C++]) line to trim the noise. On Sunday, February

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages in > list > or anything else -- please let me know. python-compreffor rats

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 18 February 2018 at 17:09, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 14:18 -0600, Greg Hellings wrote: > Igor > > On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko < > ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > If you fixed

  1   2   >