Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

standards > and practices for Fedora" > <packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 3:27:01 PM > Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging > guideline: More Go packaging > > > > - Mail original - > De:

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Mail original - De: "Jakub Cajka" > Our as Fedora or yours company/org? I believe that your contribution of those > in to Fedora will be much > appreciated. Our was meaning the set of specs we are preparing for inclusion. Can't really share them before the macros they depend on

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Original Message - > From: "nicolas mailhot" > To: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > , "Discussion of RPM packaging > standards and practices for Fedora"

Re: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:00 AM, wrote: > > > - Mail original - > De: "Neal Gompa" > >> As long as I can do Obsoletes/Provides for the old name for the devel, >> unit-test, > > BTW is anyone using the unit-test packages? Right now I do not generate them, > I

Re: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Mail original - De: "Neal Gompa" > As long as I can do Obsoletes/Provides for the old name for the devel, > unit-test, BTW is anyone using the unit-test packages? Right now I do not generate them, I don't need them, and making them work with autodeps would be hairy (deploying

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

- Mail original - De: "Neal Gompa" >> 2. if your concern is that the *forge* macros are defective somewhere I'd >> be curious where as you'd be the >> first to report an actual technical problem. I've used them intensively in >> rawhide and el7 with many different >>rpm tools and

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 5:45 AM, wrote: > > > - Mail original - > De: "Neal Gompa" > >>On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune >> I really do like this. There are only two issues I have with it: 1. This seems to mandate that all