On 07/28/2015 06:59 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Actually, reproducable builds wrt. docs have been subject to Fedora
Packaging since Fedora day #1 and repeatedly have been subject to
discussions of details (e.g. doxygen repeatedly had introduced docs
breakages)
Packages which do not comply to
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-07-28 5:58 GMT-03:00 Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com:
On 07/26/2015 04:05 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
Should I make the doc packages arch specific?
No, this
Am 01.08.2015 um 23:05 schrieb Florian Weimer:
On 07/28/2015 06:59 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Actually, reproducable builds wrt. docs have been subject to Fedora
Packaging since Fedora day #1 and repeatedly have been subject to
discussions of details (e.g. doxygen repeatedly had introduced
On 07/26/2015 04:05 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
Should I make the doc packages arch specific?
No, this is not a reason to make them arch-specific. A lot of packages
give different results when built twice in a row, on the *same*
architecture.
There is an effort under way to
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-07-27 22:34 GMT-03:00 Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com:
Excerpts from paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade's message of 2015-07-27 00:05
+10:00:
Should I make the doc packages arch
Excerpts from Peter Robinson's message of 2015-07-28 18:01 +10:00:
This is completely NOT appropriate, it breaks on secondary arches
where they then end up with no documentation due to the lack of any
x86_64. Please DO NOT do this and please revert the change on any
packages you might have
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com wrote:
Excerpts from paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade's message of 2015-07-27 00:05
+10:00:
Should I make the doc packages arch specific?
Rather than trying to make Sphinx spit out bitwise-identical output on
every arch (which
2015-07-28 5:03 GMT-03:00 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
%ifarch x86_64
%package doc
BuildArch: noarch
...
%endif
This looks like a very wise way of handling it. Actually, while debugging
It's not, it breaks all secondary architectures.
it, I found that the translated
2015-07-28 5:58 GMT-03:00 Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com:
On 07/26/2015 04:05 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
Should I make the doc packages arch specific?
No, this is not a reason to make them arch-specific. A lot of packages
give different results when built twice in a row,
On 07/28/2015 10:58 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 07/26/2015 04:05 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
Should I make the doc packages arch specific?
No, this is not a reason to make them arch-specific. A lot of packages
give different results when built twice in a row, on the *same*
Excerpts from paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade's message of 2015-07-27 00:05
+10:00:
Should I make the doc packages arch specific?
Rather than trying to make Sphinx spit out bitwise-identical output on
every arch (which sounds like fighting a losing battle), could you just
build the doc
On 07/28/2015 03:34 AM, Dan Callaghan wrote:
Excerpts from paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade's message of 2015-07-27 00:05
+10:00:
Should I make the doc packages arch specific?
Rather than trying to make Sphinx spit out bitwise-identical output on
every arch (which sounds like fighting a losing
2015-07-27 22:34 GMT-03:00 Dan Callaghan dcall...@redhat.com:
Excerpts from paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade's message of 2015-07-27 00:05
+10:00:
Should I make the doc packages arch specific?
Rather than trying to make Sphinx spit out bitwise-identical output on
every arch (which sounds like
On Dom, 2015-07-26 at 11:05 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
I had this build failure:
Package:sagemath-6.5-7.fc22
Status: failed
Built by: pcpa
ID: 672175
Started:Sat, 25 Jul 2015 22:52:10 UTC
Finished: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 07:57:28 UTC
Closed tasks:
I had this build failure:
Package:sagemath-6.5-7.fc22
Status: failed
Built by: pcpa
ID: 672175
Started:Sat, 25 Jul 2015 22:52:10 UTC
Finished: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 07:57:28 UTC
Closed tasks:
-
Task 10480570 on arm04-builder10.arm.fedoraproject.org
Task Type: build
2015-07-26 12:20 GMT-03:00 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com:
On Dom, 2015-07-26 at 11:05 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
I had this build failure:
Package:sagemath-6.5-7.fc22
Status: failed
Built by: pcpa
ID: 672175
Started:Sat, 25 Jul 2015 22:52:10 UTC
16 matches
Mail list logo
