OK, thanks for clearing that up!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 1 April 2015 at 19:25, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> If CC0-1.0 is (at least almost) equivalent, I am perfectly fine with
> that, no need to specify a new tag.
I think it's very similar indeed. I use CC0 myself when I want Public
Domain that's legally clear in all countries.
Richard.
--
deve
Since the metadata_license tag covers the metadata files themselves
and not the fonts and documentation, I would feel bad to choose
something more restrictive than what the original creator has chosen.
If CC0-1.0 is (at least almost) equivalent, I am perfectly fine with
that, no need to specify a n
On 1 April 2015 at 19:06, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> As far as I can tell, that makes them public domain. Is it the same as
> CC0-1.0 or is there another license I should choose?
You don't *have* to choose SPDX license IDs -- something like "Public
Domain" would be fine I suppose, although I'd
Hello everyone,
While writing metainfo files for a few fonts, I noticed that their
creator states on his website:
"Fonts and documents in this site are not pieces of property or
merchandise items; they carry no trademark, copyright, license or
other market tags; they are free for any use."
As fa
