On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 04:54:24PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-05-28 at 14:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 10:42 +0200, Michal Novotny wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Ben
On Mon, 2018-05-28 at 14:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 10:42 +0200, Michal Novotny wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Ben Rosser wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Looking at the dist-git README further
On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 10:42 +0200, Michal Novotny wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Ben Rosser wrote:
> > >
> > > Looking at the dist-git README further reinforces this impression. The
> > > first sentence says: "DistGit
https://github.com/release-engineering/dist-git/commit/6502c87ebdf58661e8ff96fe4a3212b5991f8a44
>I agree that using "Fedora Package Source Repository"
>instead of just "Fedora DistGit" is clearer (but also longer
>so I, personally, like your Glossary suggestion the best).
I think it depends on
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 7:29 PM, Christopher
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 4:43 AM Michal Novotny wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Ben Rosser
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 4:43 AM Michal Novotny wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Ben Rosser wrote:
>> >
>> > Looking at the dist-git README further reinforces this
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Ben Rosser wrote:
> >
> > Looking at the dist-git README further reinforces this impression. The
> > first sentence says: "DistGit (Distributed Git) is Git with
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Ben Rosser wrote:
> >
> > Looking at the dist-git README further reinforces this impression. The
> > first sentence says: "DistGit (Distributed Git) is Git with
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>> Unlike VCSes like CVS and SVN, Git does not handle binaries very well,
>> and so they needed to be moved out of the VCS into an external store.
>
> Actually, the external lookaside cache was
Neal Gompa wrote:
> Unlike VCSes like CVS and SVN, Git does not handle binaries very well,
> and so they needed to be moved out of the VCS into an external store.
Actually, the external lookaside cache was already used in Fedora in the CVS
days.
Kevin Kofler
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> Looking at the dist-git README further reinforces this impression. The
> first sentence says: "DistGit (Distributed Git) is Git with additional
> data storage". My initial reaction to that is "so, it is basically
> just
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 24.3.2018 v 06:59 Christopher napsal(a):
>> Can we stop saying "dist-git" in our docs? Nobody knows what that is.
>> The service at https://src.fedoraproject.org is clearly branded as "Fedora
>> Package Sources".
>
>
Dne 24.3.2018 v 06:59 Christopher napsal(a):
> Can we stop saying "dist-git" in our docs? Nobody knows what that is.
> The service at https://src.fedoraproject.org is clearly branded as "Fedora
> Package Sources".
BTW dist-git is (for some time) documented quite well:
On 03/24/2018 01:59 AM, Christopher wrote:
> If this seems reasonable, I'd be happy to help start editing some of the
> wiki pages... but it'd be helpful if everybody maintaining
> infrastructure documentation was on the same page.
+1 from me.
___
devel
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 05:59:38AM +, Christopher wrote:
> Can we stop saying "dist-git" in our docs? Nobody knows what that is.
> The service at https://src.fedoraproject.org is clearly branded as "Fedora
> Package Sources".
>
> Using the jargon "dist-git" in our documentation is simply
Can we stop saying "dist-git" in our docs? Nobody knows what that is.
The service at https://src.fedoraproject.org is clearly branded as "Fedora
Package Sources".
Using the jargon "dist-git" in our documentation is simply confusing, since
it doesn't match what the service calls itself, and
16 matches
Mail list logo