On 9/5/20 5:29 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
If BTRFS is to become fedora default, we should consider this?
"BTRFS relatime vs. noatime - Huge Performance Difference - linux"
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/imgler/btrfs_relatime_vs_noatime_huge_performance/?utm_source=amp_mediu
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 6:30 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 1:37 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> But if you've got a snapshot once per day, times ten days, and this kind of
>> aggressive search function touching every file? Maybe an extra 1-2G of
>> metadata being pinned
>
>
> I
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 8:30 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 1:37 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> But if you've got a snapshot once per day, times ten days, and this kind of
>> aggressive search function touching every file? Maybe an extra 1-2G of
>> metadata being pinned
>
>
> I
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 1:37 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
> But if you've got a snapshot once per day, times ten days, and this kind
> of aggressive search function touching every file? Maybe an extra 1-2G of
> metadata being pinned
>
I don't follow. If you have one master copy and 10 snapshots, and
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 3:00 AM Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> I've found atime useful in several cases. If you are doubting about a
> configuration file being
> read or not by an application, you just check the atime before and after
> running it
> (way easier than strace). If you are investigating
On 2020-09-06 01:35, Chris Murphy wrote:
I figured nothing was using it these days and it was a complete waste. If
tracker uses atime, maybe I'll get more worried. But if it uses mtime, I'm not.
I've found atime useful in several cases. If you are doubting about a
configuration file being
On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 11:22 AM Dominique Martinet
wrote:
>
> Matthew Miller wrote on Sat, Sep 05, 2020:
> > On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 08:46:37AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > "BTRFS relatime vs. noatime - Huge Performance Difference - linux"
> > >
On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 6:30 AM Neal Becker wrote:
>
> If BTRFS is to become fedora default, we should consider this?
>
> "BTRFS relatime vs. noatime - Huge Performance Difference - linux"
> https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/imgler/btrfs_relatime_vs_noatime_hug
Matthew Miller wrote on Sat, Sep 05, 2020:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 08:46:37AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > "BTRFS relatime vs. noatime - Huge Performance Difference - linux"
> > > https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/imgler/btrfs_relatime_vs_noatime_huge_per
On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 08:46:37AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > "BTRFS relatime vs. noatime - Huge Performance Difference - linux"
> > https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/imgler/btrfs_relatime_vs_noatime_huge_performance/?utm_source=amp_medium=_content=post_body
> It
On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 8:30 AM Neal Becker wrote:
>
>
> If BTRFS is to become fedora default, we should consider this?
>
> "BTRFS relatime vs. noatime - Huge Performance Difference - linux"
> https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/imgler/btrfs_relatime_vs_noatime_
If BTRFS is to become fedora default, we should consider this?
"BTRFS relatime vs. noatime - Huge Performance Difference - linux"
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/imgler/btrfs_relatime_vs_noatime_huge_performance/?utm_source=amp_medium=_content=post_body
--
*Those who don't
12 matches
Mail list logo
