Re: BTRFS vs LVM for VM storage (was: Re: Plans for BTRFS in Fedora)

2011-03-02 Thread Josef Bacik
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 02:51:50PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: >> 2) Fedora 16 ships without LVM as the volume manager and instead use >> BTRFS's built in volume management, again just for the default. > > Sorry I'm a bit late on this gentl

BTRFS vs LVM for VM storage (was: Re: Plans for BTRFS in Fedora)

2011-03-02 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 02:51:50PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > 2) Fedora 16 ships without LVM as the volume manager and instead use > BTRFS's built in volume management, again just for the default. Sorry I'm a bit late on this gentle discussion, but I have one question about this: I use LVM to st