On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Doug Ledford wrote:
One could argue that the current bodhi karma system is simply too
simplistic for real use cases. Maybe instead of just +1 -1, there
should be:
Fixes my problem
Works for me (someone testing that didn't necessarily have any of the
problem supposedly
Björn Persson wrote:
That sounds really good, although I would call the second one still works
for me to emphasize that it's for people for whom the previous release
also worked.
Right.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Doug Ledford wrote:
Fixes my problem
Works for me (someone testing that didn't necessarily have any of the
problem supposedly fixed by this update just noting that their system
still works ok with the update)
Doesn't fix my problem (but doesn't
Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org writes:
[...]
Oh yes. Even just a big red REGRESSION button that stops the update from
automatically entering stable no matter what the karma votes happen to be
would be a definite improvement. [...]
Just for completeness, please let's be cautious
On 03/02/2010 04:25 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Doug Ledford wrote:
Fixes my problem
Works for me (someone testing that didn't necessarily have any of the
problem supposedly fixed by this update just noting that their system
still works ok with the
Split off from the stable pushes in Bodhi thread just because I'd like
to see it not get lost.
On 02/27/2010 11:35 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
On 02/27/2010 11:27 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 10:57 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Yeah, it's not perfect: there are cases where we
Doug Ledford wrote:
One could argue that the current bodhi karma system is simply too
simplistic for real use cases. Maybe instead of just +1 -1, there
should be:
Fixes my problem
Works for me (someone testing that didn't necessarily have any of the
problem supposedly fixed by this update
On Monday, 01 March 2010 at 23:34, Doug Ledford wrote:
[...]
One could argue that the current bodhi karma system is simply too
simplistic for real use cases.
There's nothing to argue. It's rather obvious. :)
Maybe instead of just +1 -1, there should be:
Fixes my problem
Works for me
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 17:34 -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
One could argue that the current bodhi karma system is simply too
simplistic for real use cases. Maybe instead of just +1 -1, there
should be:
Fixes my problem
Works for me (someone testing that didn't necessarily have any of the
