On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 14:40:50 +0200,
Kalev Lember wrote:
[meshmagick]
meshmagick-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.armv7hl requires libOgreMain.so.1.8.1
meshmagick-libs-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.armv7hl requires
libOgreMain.so.1.8.1
meshmagick has been rebuilt in rawhide and f21 (reques
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 04:47:29PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>> >> [cduce]
>> >>cduce-0.5.5-9.fc21.armv7hl requires ocaml(Camlp4) =
>> >> 0:ebd368022fd2bc7b305a42902efa4c90
>>
>> This fails to rebuild:
>> https://koji.fedorapro
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 04:47:29PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> >> [cduce]
> >>cduce-0.5.5-9.fc21.armv7hl requires ocaml(Camlp4) =
> >> 0:ebd368022fd2bc7b305a42902efa4c90
>
> This fails to rebuild:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7881630
This was waiting for an upst
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:40:50 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone
> unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the
> maintainers are supposed to get daily notifications to make sure these
> don't go unnoticed.
>
> Doe
On Thursday, 16 October 2014 at 16:47, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 14:40 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone
> > unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the
> > maintainers are s
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 04:47:29PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 14:40 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone
> > unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the
> > maintainers ar
On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 14:40 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone
> unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the
> maintainers are supposed to get daily notifications to make sure these
> don't go unnotice
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 14:40:50 +0200,
Kalev Lember wrote:
Does anyone have ideas how to deal with these packages?
I have been meaning to deal with meshmagick. I actually did a small
part of the changes locally. The issue is that stricter checking by
gcc is resulting in the package not bu
Hi all,
We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone
unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the
maintainers are supposed to get daily notifications to make sure these
don't go unnoticed.
Does anyone have ideas how to deal with these packages?
I wond
