Hello,
In order to hopefully (and I understand this is a unrealistically big
hope) stem the amount of hostile comments and random remarks about
Btrfs not being ready for F16 that I get with _every_ bz that get's
filed against it, let me announce this as clearly as possible
BTRFS WILL NOT BE THE
On 8.8.2011 14:44, Josef Bacik wrote:
I appreciate those who will continue to use it and report bugs, we are
working very hard on trying to get everything more stable and it is a
slow going process. With your help we will be in a better situation
for F17. Thanks,
So, no increase of your
On 08/08/2011 08:55 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
On 8.8.2011 14:44, Josef Bacik wrote:
I appreciate those who will continue to use it and report bugs, we are
working very hard on trying to get everything more stable and it is a
slow
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
On 08/08/2011 08:55 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
On 8.8.2011 14:44, Josef Bacik wrote:
I appreciate those who will continue to use it and report bugs, we are
On 08/08/2011 01:44 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Hello,
In order to hopefully (and I understand this is a unrealistically big
hope) stem the amount of hostile comments and random remarks about
Btrfs not being ready for F16 that I get with _every_ bz that get's
filed against it, let me announce
On 08/08/2011 04:07 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
On 08/08/2011 08:55 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
On 8.8.2011 14:44, Josef Bacik wrote:
I appreciate those who will
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Farkas Levente lfar...@lfarkas.org wrote:
On 08/08/2011 04:07 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
On 08/08/2011 08:55 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com
On 08/08/2011 07:48 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Sounds good ... can you give us an update and ballpark timeline of
RAID-5 on btrfs as well if you don't mind?
It requires the larger than page size blocksize work which is slated
for 3.2, I'm not sure what Chris has in mind specifically but I
Farkas Levente wrote:
something better. there is no roadmap, who is responsible for what which
is the planed kernel version, how do you plane raid-5/6 integration etc...
You mean, like this[1]?
[1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/QA/Fennec/Milestones/8.0#Features_Tracked
--
devel mailing list
On 08/08/2011 05:44 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Hello,
In order to hopefully (and I understand this is a unrealistically big
hope) stem the amount of hostile comments and random remarks about
Btrfs not being ready for F16 that I get with _every_ bz that get's
filed against it, let me announce
10 matches
Mail list logo
