On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:29:39AM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On St, 2013-11-20 at 20:33 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > See:
> > https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/blob/trunk/byterun/md5.c#L78
> >
> > (1) In terms of the bundled(md5-$IMPLEMENTATION), which
> > $IMPLEMENTATION is this?
>
> It is
On Čt, 2013-11-21 at 11:26 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:29:39AM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > On St, 2013-11-20 at 20:33 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > See:
> > > https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/blob/trunk/byterun/md5.c#L78
> > >
> > > (1) In terms of the bun
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:29:39AM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On St, 2013-11-20 at 20:33 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > See:
> > https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/blob/trunk/byterun/md5.c#L78
> >
> > (1) In terms of the bundled(md5-$IMPLEMENTATION), which
> > $IMPLEMENTATION is this?
>
> It is
On St, 2013-11-20 at 20:33 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> See:
> https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/blob/trunk/byterun/md5.c#L78
>
> (1) In terms of the bundled(md5-$IMPLEMENTATION), which
> $IMPLEMENTATION is this?
It is bundled(md5-plumb)
> (2) Ideally I would like to replace this with a call
See:
https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/blob/trunk/byterun/md5.c#L78
(1) In terms of the bundled(md5-$IMPLEMENTATION), which
$IMPLEMENTATION is this?
(2) Ideally I would like to replace this with a call to a library (in
Fedora, I don't think this would be accepted upstream). But which
library shoul