On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 11:29 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, folks!
Thanks for all your feedback on this, folks, and sorry for messing up
the links in the original post :)
Thanks to all your work we had sufficient information to determine the
bug does not need to block the Beta release, so we
On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 12:33 +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> I tested
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_Alpha_RC2/Server/i386/i
> so/Fedora-Server-netinst-i386-23_Alpha.iso
> on a dual Athlon MP system and it boots fine to anaconda.
>
> A little bit later I discovered
> https://d
I tested
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_Alpha_RC2/Server/i386/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-i386-23_Alpha.iso
on a dual Athlon MP system and it boots fine to anaconda.
A little bit later I discovered
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_Beta_RC1/Server/i386/iso/Fedora-Server-ne
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 14:17:13 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I have a dual MP system as my main desktop at home. I rebooted it a
couple of times this week with rawhide nodebug kernels (the base
system is rawhide) and haven't had a problem.
It won't boot from flash drives and I was unable
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:08:15 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
If anyone reading this has an old 32-bit AMD system - the last range
of 32-bit AMD CPUs was the Athlon XPs from early 2003, anything
'Athlon 64' or later is 64-bit - and it's not too much trouble, could
you please grab a 23 Beta RC
Hi, folks!
We've found an issue in Fedora 23 Beta testing which seems to affect
AMD CPUs when booting the 32-bit images:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263762
unfortunately, so far all those who've tested have only had 64-bit
CPUs. So we know there's a problem booting the 32-bit im