Re: Can we retire mozjs68 in rawhide?
Thanks for trying, fired off the build for real, passed too, mozjs68 retired from rawhide. I'll add it to fedora-obsolete-packages too. On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 12:20 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > * Frantisek Zatloukal: > > > Hey, > > > > yeah, I am looking forward to throwing it away, erlang-js was changed ( > > https://github.com/erlang-mozjs/erlang-mozjs/issues/6 ) to be built > against the new mozjs, > > but the build has failed, so repos still contain the old version ( > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2085927 ). > > Hmm, a scratch build just passed? > > […] > 0 free 0 open 7 done 0 failed > > 94687227 build (rawhide, erlang-js-1.9.3-1.fc38.src.rpm) completed > successfully > > So I guess we can build it for real and then go through the motions to > retire mozjs68? > > Thanks, > Florian > > -- Best regards / S pozdravem, František Zatloukal Senior Quality Engineer Red Hat ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Can we retire mozjs68 in rawhide?
* Frantisek Zatloukal: > Hey, > > yeah, I am looking forward to throwing it away, erlang-js was changed ( > https://github.com/erlang-mozjs/erlang-mozjs/issues/6 ) to be built against > the new mozjs, > but the build has failed, so repos still contain the old version ( > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2085927 ). Hmm, a scratch build just passed? […] 0 free 0 open 7 done 0 failed 94687227 build (rawhide, erlang-js-1.9.3-1.fc38.src.rpm) completed successfully So I guess we can build it for real and then go through the motions to retire mozjs68? Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Can we retire mozjs68 in rawhide?
Hey, yeah, I am looking forward to throwing it away, erlang-js was changed ( https://github.com/erlang-mozjs/erlang-mozjs/issues/6 ) to be built against the new mozjs, but the build has failed, so repos still contain the old version ( https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2085927 ). Anyhow, thanks for the heads up, Florian! On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 11:34 AM Kalev Lember wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:44 AM Florian Weimer > wrote: > >> I don't see anything depending on it in the RPM specs file archive. >> >> It looks like the configure script might get confused when building with >> future C compilers which do not accept implicit function declarations, >> and it's probably not worth porting this to C99. >> > > According to my repoquery, erlang-js still uses mozjs68: > > $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires mozjs68 --disablerepo='*' > --enablerepo=rawhide > Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release > > 36 kB/s | 10 kB 00:00 > Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release > > 23 MB/s | 64 MB 00:02 > Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:13 ago on Tue 29 Nov 2022 11:18:22 AM > CET. > erlang-js-0:1.9.2-6.fc37.x86_64 > mozjs68-devel-0:68.12.0-8.fc37.i686 > mozjs68-devel-0:68.12.0-8.fc37.x86_64 > > When it is time to retire mozjs68 (apparently not yet because of > erlang-js, but hopefully soon :) ), please add mozjs68 to > fedora-obsolete-packages because a lot of users probably still have it > installed and it is going to get broken deps and break the update path as > soon as icu gets updated in rawhide. > > -- > Kalev > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- Best regards / S pozdravem, František Zatloukal Senior Quality Engineer Red Hat ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Can we retire mozjs68 in rawhide?
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:44 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > I don't see anything depending on it in the RPM specs file archive. > > It looks like the configure script might get confused when building with > future C compilers which do not accept implicit function declarations, > and it's probably not worth porting this to C99. > According to my repoquery, erlang-js still uses mozjs68: $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires mozjs68 --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release 36 kB/s | 10 kB 00:00 Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release 23 MB/s | 64 MB 00:02 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:13 ago on Tue 29 Nov 2022 11:18:22 AM CET. erlang-js-0:1.9.2-6.fc37.x86_64 mozjs68-devel-0:68.12.0-8.fc37.i686 mozjs68-devel-0:68.12.0-8.fc37.x86_64 When it is time to retire mozjs68 (apparently not yet because of erlang-js, but hopefully soon :) ), please add mozjs68 to fedora-obsolete-packages because a lot of users probably still have it installed and it is going to get broken deps and break the update path as soon as icu gets updated in rawhide. -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Can we retire mozjs68 in rawhide?
I don't see anything depending on it in the RPM specs file archive. It looks like the configure script might get confused when building with future C compilers which do not accept implicit function declarations, and it's probably not worth porting this to C99. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
