Re: Can we squeeze coreutils-9.4 into Fedora 39?

2023-08-31 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 6:11 PM David Cantrell wrote: > I personally agree that this is enough of a change to warrant > consideration for Fedora 39, but I want Fedora QA to weigh in. At this > point we have beta and final blockers and you can use this form to > propose one: > >

Re: Can we squeeze coreutils-9.4 into Fedora 39?

2023-08-31 Thread David Cantrell
On 8/30/23 15:45, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2023-08-30 at 12:11 -0400, David Cantrell wrote: On 8/29/23 23:13, Ian Laurie wrote: coreutils-9.3 brought changes to the behavior of the -v option which broke some of my automation scripts. Because of this I have been blocking updates to

Re: Can we squeeze coreutils-9.4 into Fedora 39?

2023-08-30 Thread Ian Laurie
On 8/31/23 02:11, David Cantrell wrote: I personally agree that this is enough of a change to warrant consideration for Fedora 39, but I want Fedora QA to weigh in. As per Adam's input I've created [1] and suggested to backport the specific patch as a freeze exception. [1]

Re: Can we squeeze coreutils-9.4 into Fedora 39?

2023-08-30 Thread Ian Laurie
On 8/31/23 05:45, Adam Williamson wrote: well, the question is not so much how useful is *this* change, but what *other* changes does coreutils 9.4 introduce. During Beta freeze, it would be much safer to just backport this specific change. This is clearly not a Beta blocker, but you can

Re: Can we squeeze coreutils-9.4 into Fedora 39?

2023-08-30 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 20:45, Adam Williamson wrote: [..] BTW it would be good to push as many coreutils patches to upstream. Especially the selinux patch. kloczek -- Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Can we squeeze coreutils-9.4 into Fedora 39?

2023-08-30 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2023-08-30 at 12:11 -0400, David Cantrell wrote: > On 8/29/23 23:13, Ian Laurie wrote: > > coreutils-9.3 brought changes to the behavior of the -v option which > > broke some of my automation scripts. > > > > Because of this I have been blocking updates to coreutils in Rawhide and > >

Re: Can we squeeze coreutils-9.4 into Fedora 39?

2023-08-30 Thread David Cantrell
On 8/29/23 23:13, Ian Laurie wrote: coreutils-9.3 brought changes to the behavior of the -v option which broke some of my automation scripts. Because of this I have been blocking updates to coreutils in Rawhide and Fedora 39. and I'm running coreutils-9.2-4.fc39.x86_64. This change in the -v

Can we squeeze coreutils-9.4 into Fedora 39?

2023-08-29 Thread Ian Laurie
coreutils-9.3 brought changes to the behavior of the -v option which broke some of my automation scripts. Because of this I have been blocking updates to coreutils in Rawhide and Fedora 39. and I'm running coreutils-9.2-4.fc39.x86_64. This change in the -v option has been reverted in 9.4