Re: Confused by packager dashboard: FTBFS (source)
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 2:53 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 1:55 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 4:58 AM Fabio Valentini > wrote: > >> > >> Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 8:39 AM Iñaki Ucar > wrote: > >> > > >> > I opened an issue in the dashboard repo for the same reason some > weeks ago. It turns out there's a limitation on detecting these cases, so > Fabio maintains a whitelist. > >> > >> I can add python-pyside2 to the list, if you give me the exact error > you see. > >> There are already a few packages that are filtered out because of > >> qt5-qtwebengine, so you're in good company: > >> > https://pagure.io/ironthree/repochecker/blob/master/f/overrides.json#_106 > > > > > > The exact BR is: > > cmake(Qt5WebEngine) >= 5.14 > > Sorry for taking so long to get back to this. I only just managed to > get my overflowing email inbox under control ... > Either way, the python-pyside2 issue should be resolved now, and it > appears the updated data has already propagated to the packager > dashboard. > Thanks for following up! Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Confused by packager dashboard: FTBFS (source)
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 1:55 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 4:58 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 8:39 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: >> > >> > I opened an issue in the dashboard repo for the same reason some weeks >> > ago. It turns out there's a limitation on detecting these cases, so Fabio >> > maintains a whitelist. >> >> I can add python-pyside2 to the list, if you give me the exact error you see. >> There are already a few packages that are filtered out because of >> qt5-qtwebengine, so you're in good company: >> https://pagure.io/ironthree/repochecker/blob/master/f/overrides.json#_106 > > > The exact BR is: > cmake(Qt5WebEngine) >= 5.14 Sorry for taking so long to get back to this. I only just managed to get my overflowing email inbox under control ... Either way, the python-pyside2 issue should be resolved now, and it appears the updated data has already propagated to the packager dashboard. Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Confused by packager dashboard: FTBFS (source)
On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 4:58 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 8:39 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > > I opened an issue in the dashboard repo for the same reason some weeks > ago. It turns out there's a limitation on detecting these cases, so Fabio > maintains a whitelist. > > I can add python-pyside2 to the list, if you give me the exact error you > see. > There are already a few packages that are filtered out because of > qt5-qtwebengine, so you're in good company: > https://pagure.io/ironthree/repochecker/blob/master/f/overrides.json#_106 The exact BR is: cmake(Qt5WebEngine) >= 5.14 Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Confused by packager dashboard: FTBFS (source)
Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 8:39 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > I opened an issue in the dashboard repo for the same reason some weeks ago. > It turns out there's a limitation on detecting these cases, so Fabio > maintains a whitelist. Yup :( This is due to the fact that architecture-specific BuildRequires are not accurately represented in package repository data. TL;DR: koji builds the .src.rpm file for all architectures, but only keeps a random one, which then ends up in the "-source" repositories that is shared by all architectures. If it happens to be from an architecture that *has* these BuildRequires, then the package will have BuildRequires in its metadata that are unresolvable on some architectures. I can add python-pyside2 to the list, if you give me the exact error you see. There are already a few packages that are filtered out because of qt5-qtwebengine, so you're in good company: https://pagure.io/ironthree/repochecker/blob/master/f/overrides.json#_106 Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Confused by packager dashboard: FTBFS (source)
I opened an issue in the dashboard repo for the same reason some weeks ago. It turns out there's a limitation on detecting these cases, so Fabio maintains a whitelist. Iñaki El sáb., 24 sept. 2022 4:19, Richard Shaw escribió: > I've really been enjoying using the dashboard, it's pointed out things > that I quite frankly forgot about. > > For python-pyside2 though it's showing FTBFS at the source level due to > qt5-qtwebengine not being built for ppc64le and s390x, but I have a > %ifnarch conditional removing it from the build requirements for those > arches. > > After convincing myself that it must be being pulled in from another > package I tried playing around with installing qtwebengine by starting a > build of pyside2 in a mock chroot and shelling into it, but I was able to > rpm -e it without conflicts with other installed packages. > > I then tried a scratch build which largely succeeded, all arches built but > s390x failed during %check. > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92294488 > > So what gives? > > Thanks, > Richard > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Confused by packager dashboard: FTBFS (source)
I've really been enjoying using the dashboard, it's pointed out things that I quite frankly forgot about. For python-pyside2 though it's showing FTBFS at the source level due to qt5-qtwebengine not being built for ppc64le and s390x, but I have a %ifnarch conditional removing it from the build requirements for those arches. After convincing myself that it must be being pulled in from another package I tried playing around with installing qtwebengine by starting a build of pyside2 in a mock chroot and shelling into it, but I was able to rpm -e it without conflicts with other installed packages. I then tried a scratch build which largely succeeded, all arches built but s390x failed during %check. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92294488 So what gives? Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
