lör 2010-05-08 klockan 00:56 +0200 skrev Guido Grazioli:
Someone would disagree with me; however i think any decision is taken on
that topic would be turned in a MUST (depend or not depend) for the sake
of coherency.
I can only think of rather far-fetched situations where such a
dependency
Hello All!
Sometimes *-javadoc sub-packages explicitly requires main package, and
sometimes - not. I'm not a java-expert, so I don't know which is
correct.
Could someone, please, clarify this?
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
PL == Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com writes:
PL Sometimes *-javadoc sub-packages explicitly requires main
PL package, and sometimes - not. I'm not a java-expert, so I don't know
PL which is correct.
Java guidelines have come up recently on the packaging list.
The templates in the Java
On Friday 07 May 2010, Andrew Overholt wrote:
Hi,
Sometimes *-javadoc sub-packages explicitly requires main package, and
sometimes - not. I'm not a java-expert, so I don't know which is
correct.
I don't think it really matters. In some cases, sure, it would be nice
to ensure that the
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:41 -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
Sometimes *-javadoc sub-packages explicitly requires main package, and
sometimes - not. I'm not a java-expert, so I don't know which is
correct.
I don't think it really matters. In some cases, sure, it would be nice
to ensure
(changing lists)
fre 2010-05-07 klockan 13:41 -0400 skrev Andrew Overholt:
Hi,
Sometimes *-javadoc sub-packages explicitly requires main package, and
sometimes - not. I'm not a java-expert, so I don't know which is
correct.
I don't think it really matters. In some cases, sure, it
2010/5/7 Alexander Boström a...@root.snowtree.se:
fre 2010-05-07 klockan 13:41 -0400 skrev Andrew Overholt:
Sometimes *-javadoc sub-packages explicitly requires main package, and
sometimes - not. I'm not a java-expert, so I don't know which is
correct.
I don't think it really matters. In
