manually.
It's the default with a local buildroot override repo added (cost=0 and
metadata_expire=0). That has worked flawlessly for several years.
I've tried to take a look at it a few times with extra Mock runs. The dnf
update step for the Rawhide build target has been choking while downloading
On 2015-03-16 06:43, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 03/15/2015 02:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:15:48 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I just spoke with two members of DNF team about default usage of DNF in mock. I
would like to share outcomes of this
meeting.
First I
On 03/16/2015 12:32 PM, Michael Šimáček wrote:
Configurations shipped with current mock have keepcache=1 by default, so
the redownloading shouldn't happen if you have yum_cache enabled. But if
you use different configs than the default ones, you'll need to adjust
the config manually.
Right.
On 03/15/2015 02:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Is DNF within Mock a fully compatible replacement for Yum yet?
It seems builds take much longer now since something's downloading
(or redownloading?) lots of data for each build job before setting
up the buildroot. I don't have much time to look
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:15:48 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I just spoke with two members of DNF team about default usage of DNF in mock.
I would like to share outcomes of this
meeting.
First I would like to state that you can already optionally use DNF in your
mock by setting
On 03/15/2015 02:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:15:48 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I just spoke with two members of DNF team about default usage of DNF in
mock. I would like to share outcomes of this
meeting.
First I would like to state that you can already
Does it mean that everything either migrated to Fedora or at
least considered
to be migrated soon?
When you mean everything are you asking about web servers,
database servers, email servers, etc?
Build servers
Well, if we can
On 28. 1. 2015 at 11:52:54, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:01:44 -0700
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 18:09:02 +0100
Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 27. 1. 2015 at 10:03:54, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 27 January 2015 at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:11 +0100
Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28. 1. 2015 at 11:52:54, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:01:44 -0700
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 18:09:02 +0100
Jan
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 18:09:02 +0100
Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 27. 1. 2015 at 10:03:54, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 27 January 2015 at 01:37, Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
...snip...
Does it mean that everything either migrated to Fedora or at least
considered
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:01:44 -0700
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 18:09:02 +0100
Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 27. 1. 2015 at 10:03:54, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 27 January 2015 at 01:37, Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com
wrote:
...snip...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:01:44 -0700
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 18:09:02 +0100
Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 27. 1. 2015 at 10:03:54, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 27 January 2015 at 01:37, Jan Zelený
On 27. 1. 2015 at 03:54:38, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:43:55 +
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
The kernel, grub and a few other packages are built on the RHEL6
boxes, not everything
On 27. 1. 2015 at 11:29:43, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 27 January 2015 at 10:15, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I might be asking a completely stupid question here...
Why move production stuff
On 27 January 2015 at 01:37, Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 27. 1. 2015 at 03:54:38, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:43:55 +
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
The kernel, grub
On 27. 1. 2015 at 10:03:54, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 27 January 2015 at 01:37, Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 27. 1. 2015 at 03:54:38, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:43:55 +
Ok, I might be asking a completely stupid question here...
Why move production stuff over to dnf at all? Isn't dnf's goal in life to
eventually become yum? If dnf is good enough to start using it in
production, should the discussion be around dnf - yum transition?
Thanks
Richard
--
devel
On 27 January 2015 at 10:15, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I might be asking a completely stupid question here...
Why move production stuff over to dnf at all? Isn't dnf's goal in life to
eventually become yum? If dnf is good enough to start using it in
production, should the
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 27 January 2015 at 10:15, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I might be asking a completely stupid question here...
Why move production stuff over to dnf at all? Isn't dnf's goal in life to
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:43:55 +
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
The kernel, grub and a few other packages are built on the RHEL6
boxes, not everything was migrated off of RHEL
Just out of curiosity, what are the reasons?
Signing infrastructure for secure boot.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:43:55 +
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
The kernel, grub and a few other packages are built on the RHEL6
boxes, not everything was migrated off of RHEL
Just out of curiosity, what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 23.1.2015 v 23:34 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
The kernel, grub and a few other packages are built on the RHEL6
boxes, not everything was migrated off of RHEL
Just out of curiosity, what are the reasons?
Vít
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
The kernel, grub and a few other packages are built on the RHEL6
boxes, not everything was migrated off of RHEL
Just out of curiosity, what are the reasons?
Signing infrastructure for secure boot.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- snip --
koji internally writes out mock configs for every task and it has not
mechanism to support using different backends. additionally some of the
builders are rhel6 so whatever is done has to work on rhel6 and fedora.
Huh, I was under the impression that everything was already migrated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:40:11 +0100
Jan Zeleny jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
-- snip --
koji internally writes out mock configs for every task and it has
not mechanism to support using different backends. additionally
some of the builders are
On 01/22/2015 03:58 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
This is not really true. Koji write out its own mock configs and will
not be using dnf for any operations. for anytime soon. koji hass no
way to use different tools to install chroots we will continue to use
yum to install the buildroots for the
I just spoke with two members of DNF team about default usage of DNF in mock. I
would like to share outcomes of this
meeting.
First I would like to state that you can already optionally use DNF in your
mock by setting:
config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf'
in your
/etc/mock/site
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 03:15:48PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I just spoke with two members of DNF team about default usage of DNF in mock.
I would like to share outcomes of this
meeting.
First I would like to state that you can already optionally use DNF in your
mock by setting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:00:44 +0100
Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
-- snip --
I have a notion, that after branching of Fedora 22 I will change
/etc/mock/fedora-rawhide-*.cfg
to use DNF by default. I.e. everything build for Fedora 23
-- snip --
I have a notion, that after branching of Fedora 22 I will change
/etc/mock/fedora-rawhide-*.cfg
to use DNF by default. I.e. everything build for Fedora 23 would use
DNF for building.
This is not really true. Koji write out its own mock configs and will
not be using dnf for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:15:48 +0100
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
I just spoke with two members of DNF team about default usage of DNF
in mock. I would like to share outcomes of this meeting.
First I would like to state that you can
31 matches
Mail list logo
