On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 6:09 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
>
>> I think it is probably overdue in the DECnet case, however I
>> did get a very happy with it for the most part. Anyway it is
>> clear that nobody is maintaining it and it
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> I think it is probably overdue in the DECnet case, however I
> did get a very happy with it for the most part. Anyway it is
> clear that nobody is maintaining it and it seems sensible
> that it should get removed unless someone with sufficient
>
Hi,
On 14/11/17 19:20, Laura Abbott wrote:
The kernel has seen an uptick in testing from fuzzers lately. This
has been great for the kernel as its exposed a number of bugs. See
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2017/05/exploiting-linux-kernel-via-packet.html
as an example. Part of this
The kernel has seen an uptick in testing from fuzzers lately. This
has been great for the kernel as its exposed a number of bugs. See
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2017/05/exploiting-linux-kernel-via-packet.html
as an example. Part of this has also shown what areas of the kernel
are