On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 03:35:40PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 09:11:19AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 4:13 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > What about the unused "qa contact field"? Kevin suggested dropping
> > >
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 09:11:19AM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 4:13 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > What about the unused "qa contact field"? Kevin suggested dropping
> > qa-extras [1], but it never went anywhere, afaics?
> >
> Good idea. I have a few other
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 4:13 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> What about the unused "qa contact field"? Kevin suggested dropping
> qa-extras [1], but it never went anywhere, afaics?
>
Good idea. I have a few other BZ cleanup things I want to look at
post-release. I'll add this to the
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:01:09PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:40 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > I will disable the flag on Friday 16 April unless there's a good
> > reason to keep it.
> >
> This is done. Farewell `fedora_requires_release_note` and long live
>
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:40 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> I will disable the flag on Friday 16 April unless there's a good
> reason to keep it.
>
This is done. Farewell `fedora_requires_release_note` and long live
https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/release-notes/issues !
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
I intend to disable the `fedora_requires_release_note` flag in
Bugzilla. These days, the Release Notes are mostly built via issues
against the Release Notes repo[1] on Pagure. Removing unused flags
simplifies the BZ experience for users and prevents the Docs team from
having to look in multiple
