Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
W dniu 17.09.2019 o 08:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek pisze: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:33:49AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> W dniu 11.09.2019 o 14:54, Miroslav Suchý pisze: >>> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? >> >> I migrated to F31 beta some time ago. Today decided to >> go with 'dnf distro-sync' instead of usual 'dnf update' >> command: >> >> Problem: problem with installed package kf5-ktexteditor-5.61.0-1.fc31.x86_64 >> - package kf5-ktexteditor-5.61.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires >> libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed >> - libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository >> - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded >> - package libgit2-0.28.3-1.fc31.x86_64 is excluded >> - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded > > Does 'dnf module reset libgit2' fix the issue? > (See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747408.) Yes. Thanks! Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:30 ago on wto, 17 wrz 2019, 08:53:50. Dependencies resolved. === Package Arch Version Repository Size === Downgrading: hawtjni-runtime noarch1.16-2.module_f28+3939+dc18cd75 updates-testing-modular 42 k jansi noarch1.17.1-1.module_f28+3939+dc18cd75 updates-testing-modular 78 k jansi-nativex86_641.7-7.module_f28+3939+dc18cd75 updates-testing-modular 73 k javamailnoarch1.5.2-7.module_f28+3872+5b76729e updates-testing-modular634 k libgit2 x86_640.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4 updates-testing-modular451 k ninja-build x86_641.9.0-1.module_f31+3361+bdb2aa23 updates-testing-modular126 k slf4j noarch1.7.25-4.module_f28+3939+dc18cd75 updates-testing-modular 76 k xalan-j2noarch2.7.1-38.module_f28+3872+5b76729e updates-testing-modular1.9 M xerces-j2 noarch2.11.0-34.module_f28+3872+5b76729e updates-testing-modular1.2 M xml-commons-apisnoarch1.4.01-25.module_f28+3872+5b76729e updates-testing-modular233 k xml-commons-resolvernoarch1.2-26.module_f28+3872+5b76729e updates-testing-modular114 k Enabling module streams: libgit2 0.28 Transaction Summary === Downgrade 11 Packages Total download size: 4.8 M Is this ok [y/N]: ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 08:25:49PM +0200, Guido Aulisi wrote: > Errore: > Problema: problem with installed package rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf- > 1.5.0-0.9.alpha.16.fc30.noarch > - rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.9.alpha.16.fc30.noarch does not > belong to a distupgrade repository > - nothing provides (rubygem(concurrent-ruby) >= 1.1.0 with > rubygem(concurrent-ruby) < 1.2) needed by rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf- > 1.5.0-0.10.alpha.18.fc31.noarch > - nothing provides (rubygem(treetop) >= 1.5.0 with rubygem(treetop) < > 1.6) needed by rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.10.alpha.18.fc31.noarch > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752745 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:33:49AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 11.09.2019 o 14:54, Miroslav Suchý pisze: > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? > > I migrated to F31 beta some time ago. Today decided to > go with 'dnf distro-sync' instead of usual 'dnf update' > command: > > Problem: problem with installed package kf5-ktexteditor-5.61.0-1.fc31.x86_64 > - package kf5-ktexteditor-5.61.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires > libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded > - package libgit2-0.28.3-1.fc31.x86_64 is excluded > - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded Does 'dnf module reset libgit2' fix the issue? (See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747408.) Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
W dniu 11.09.2019 o 14:54, Miroslav Suchý pisze: > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? I migrated to F31 beta some time ago. Today decided to go with 'dnf distro-sync' instead of usual 'dnf update' command: Problem: problem with installed package kf5-ktexteditor-5.61.0-1.fc31.x86_64 - package kf5-ktexteditor-5.61.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded - package libgit2-0.28.3-1.fc31.x86_64 is excluded - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded [root@puchatek puchatek-home]# rpm -qa|grep libgit libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
Il giorno mer, 11/09/2019 alle 14.54 +0200, Miroslav Suchý ha scritto: > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > time and try to run [*]: > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual > upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, > please report it against the appropriate package. Or > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 31. Please check existing reports first: > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > Thank you > > [*] this command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will > reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf > upgrade` before running this command. > > -- > Miroslav Suchy, RHCA > Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys I got this: Errore: Problema: problem with installed package rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf- 1.5.0-0.9.alpha.16.fc30.noarch - rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.9.alpha.16.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (rubygem(concurrent-ruby) >= 1.1.0 with rubygem(concurrent-ruby) < 1.2) needed by rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf- 1.5.0-0.10.alpha.18.fc31.noarch - nothing provides (rubygem(treetop) >= 1.5.0 with rubygem(treetop) < 1.6) needed by rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.10.alpha.18.fc31.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) Ciao Guido P.S. Sorry for the wrong answer to wrong Fedora version ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 7:14 PM Jerry James wrote: > No errors for me, but 3 downgrades: > > Downgrading: > gap-pkg-edim x86_64 1.3.3-6.fc31fedora78 > k > gap-pkg-genssnoarch 1.6.5-6.fc31fedora56 > k > python3-parsonoarch 0.5.1-1.fc31fedora 142 > k > > The first two are mine. I did those builds right about the time that > bodhi was enabled for F31. After it was enabled, I tried to create > updates for them just in case they hadn't quite made it in, and bodhi > told me there were no candidate builds. I just tried again, and bodhi > *still* tells me there are no candidate builds. These are the latest > actual builds for them: > > gap-pkg-edim-1.3.5-1.fc31 > gap-pkg-genss-1.6.6-1.fc31 Bodhi shows that updates for both of these packages exist already. Both are labeled "Automatic update for ". The logs for both include "This update has been submitted for stable by bodhi", but they never actually reached stable. I clicked on the "Push to Testing" button for both. It might be a good idea to check for the existence of other such zombie updates, although maybe I was the only fool actually building packages while the bodhi activation was taking place. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 06:23 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 02:47:20PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > > Is this an error with gegl03? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703828 > The update there seems to have fixed the issue and I now get to the y/n prompt successfully. Sincerely, -- Nathanael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
Dne 13. 09. 19 v 13:30 Solomon Peachy napsal(a): > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:48:44PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> There are a couple >>> of F29 stragglers left behind from the last upgrade too. Not sure what >>> I should file tickets about here.. >> There is `dnf autoremove`. You should try that. > Hate to state the obvious, but blindly removing packages (and anything > that depends on them) is probably not the correct thing to do. That is much better option than using `--allowerasing`, because this command removes leaf packages, on which nothing depends. Of course you are in charge if the packages are removed at the end or not. Using f-o-p is not always better, because obviously if nothing else, somebody must maintain that package. Vít > > - Solomon > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:48:44PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > There are a couple > > of F29 stragglers left behind from the last upgrade too. Not sure what > > I should file tickets about here.. > > There is `dnf autoremove`. You should try that. Hate to state the obvious, but blindly removing packages (and anything that depends on them) is probably not the correct thing to do. - Solomon -- Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org High Springs, FL ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^ Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
Dne 11. 09. 19 v 17:04 Solomon Peachy napsal(a): > There are a couple > of F29 stragglers left behind from the last upgrade too. Not sure what > I should file tickets about here.. There is `dnf autoremove`. You should try that. Vít signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 07:33:17AM +0200, Julian Sikorski wrote: > Problem 1: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module > eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 > > Problem 2: module jmc:latest:3120190813124555:7188e41a-0.x86_64 > requires module(eclipse), but none of the providers can be installed > > - conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module > eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 > > > what should I file the bug against? > > Błąd: > > Problem 1: package banshee-2.6.2-34.fc31.x86_64 requires > mono(gudev-sharp) = 1.0.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed > > - problem with installed package banshee-2.6.2-32.fc30.x86_64 > > - gudev-sharp-1:0.1-25.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > > - banshee-2.6.2-32.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > > should I file the bug against banshee, or against > fedora-obsolete-packages? Banshee appears to be as good as dead upstream. banshee is still maintained in Fedora. It seems that latest banshee package requires mono(Mono.Addins) = 1.0.0.0, but mono-addins only provides mono(Mono.Addins) = 0.6.0.0. Maybe we need a later version? > Problem 2: problem with installed package > system-config-users-docs-1.0.9-14.fc30.noarch > > - package system-config-users-docs-1.0.9-15.fc31.noarch requires > system-config-users >= 1.2.82, but none of the providers can be installed > > - system-config-users-docs-1.0.9-14.fc30.noarch does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > > - system-config-users-1.3.8-6.fc29.noarch does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > > > This was already reported against fedora-obsolete-packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751241 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751252 Waiting for a reply here. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 02:47:20PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > I've since run > > sudo dnf module reset eclipse > > Which results in the following error when trying a distro-sync. > > Problem: conflicting requests > - nothing provides module(eclipse) needed by module > jmc:latest:3120190813124555:7188e41a-0.x86_64 > Error: > Problem: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 requires libIlmImf- > 2_2.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - OpenEXR-libs-2.2.0-16.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) > > Is this an error with gegl03? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703828 Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
W dniu 11.09.2019 o 14:54, Miroslav Suchý pisze: > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run [*]: > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > report it against the appropriate package. Or > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora > 31. Please check existing reports first: > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > Thank you > > [*] this command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. You may also run `dnf > upgrade` before running this command. > Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 Problem 2: module jmc:latest:3120190813124555:7188e41a-0.x86_64 requires module(eclipse), but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 what should I file the bug against? Błąd: Problem 1: package banshee-2.6.2-34.fc31.x86_64 requires mono(gudev-sharp) = 1.0.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package banshee-2.6.2-32.fc30.x86_64 - gudev-sharp-1:0.1-25.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - banshee-2.6.2-32.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository should I file the bug against banshee, or against fedora-obsolete-packages? Banshee appears to be as good as dead upstream. Problem 2: problem with installed package system-config-users-docs-1.0.9-14.fc30.noarch - package system-config-users-docs-1.0.9-15.fc31.noarch requires system-config-users >= 1.2.82, but none of the providers can be installed - system-config-users-docs-1.0.9-14.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - system-config-users-1.3.8-6.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository This was already reported against fedora-obsolete-packages ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
Thanks for letting me know! On 12.09.19 10:06, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 05:18:36PM +0100, chedi toueiti wrote: Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64 - mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides mono(ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib) = 1.1.0.0 needed by mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-15.fc31.x86_64 Hmm, mono-core-5.20.1-1.fc31 provides mono(ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib) = 4.84.0.0, but mono-tools-4.2-15.fc31 was built later. tpokorra, can you take a look? I will rebuild sharpziplib, that was built before mono scripts were fixed to calculate the Provides correctly. Problem 3: package mono-debugger-2.10-21.fc30.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Cecil) = 0.9.6.0, but none of the providers can be installed - mono-cecil-0.9.6-12.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package mono-debugger-2.10-21.fc30.x86_64 More mono issues. tpokorra? mono-debugger was retired, because it is not supported by Mono 5 anymore. I have now filed a bug against fedora-obsolete-packages: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751913 all the best, Timotheus ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019, 10:24 AM Ankur Sinha, wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 10:48:51 -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > - vtk-8.1.1-5.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > There's vtk 8.2.0-6 that is already in F31 stable. So not sure what this > implies: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-986bbe4d7f > > In general what does "does not belong to a distupgrade repository" mean? > >From the dist tag, you can see this package is from F30, the old (and to be deleted from the system) repo. "Not belong to a distupgrade repository" means it didn't come from F31, the _new_ repo. It's a leftover that is either pulling in old (unsatisfiable) Requires or is pulled in by some other leftover. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On 9/12/19 1:37 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 07:12:37AM +0200, Franta Hanzlík wrote: >> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:54:45 +0200 >> Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> >>> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time >>> and try to run [*]: >>> >>> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 >>> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync >>> ... >> >> # dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 >> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync >> Adobe Systems Incorporated 5.5 kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00 >> Fedora Modular 31 -i38 42 kB/s | 54 kB 00:01 >> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora-modular' >> Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora-modular' > > For some reason (maybe somebody from either infra or the modular camp > can provide more info), the metadata for fedora-modular repositories fails > to download much more often than regular fedora. I'm not sure why that would be. It's smaller repodata, mirrored the same way. Perhaps check /var/log/dnf.librepo.log the next time it does this and see if there's anything there to help track it down? kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
I've since run sudo dnf module reset eclipse Which results in the following error when trying a distro-sync. Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(eclipse) needed by module jmc:latest:3120190813124555:7188e41a-0.x86_64 Error: Problem: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 requires libIlmImf- 2_2.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - OpenEXR-libs-2.2.0-16.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) Is this an error with gegl03? Sincerely, -- Nathanael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
Hello, I had a few problems. To clear some I had to run. sudo dnf module reset libgit2 This resulted in the rest of the errors. Modular dependency problems: Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 Problem 2: module jmc:latest:3120190813124555:7188e41a-0.x86_64 requires module(eclipse), but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 Error: Problem: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 requires libIlmImf- 2_2.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - OpenEXR-libs-2.2.0-16.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) I used to use eclipse but no longer do so I'm unsure as to the actually issue here. Nor do I know what is actually the problem with the potential upgrade. Sincerely, -- Nathanael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
Dne 11. 09. 19 v 17:04 Solomon Peachy napsal(a): > There are a couple > of F29 stragglers left behind from the last upgrade too. Not sure what > I should file tickets about here.. If the package does not cause an issue, then it can be left behind. But it can be removed using fedora-obsolete-packages. The general approach is: if it does not cause an issue during an upgrade, then do not remove it and leave it on the user. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
Dne 12. 09. 19 v 5:02 Harish Pillay napsal(a): > after adding --allowerasing to the commandline. Try it without it. The point is not to "pass it somehow", but pass it properly according documentation. If erasing is needed, then there is likely missing some obsolete somewhere. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 02:57:55PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:37:42PM +0200, Martin Kolman wrote: > > Looks like I have something uniqe I haven't seen in the other mails, > > related to packit: > > > > $ LANG=en_US sudo dnf --releasever=31 > > --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 --enablerepo=updates-testing > > distro-sync > > RCM Tools for Fedora 31 (RPMs) > > 284 B/s | 286 B 00:01 > > Failed to download metadata for repo 'rcm-tools-fedora-rpms' > > RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Free - Updates > > 310 kB/s | 76 kB 00:00 > > Failed to download metadata for repo 'rpmfusion-free-updates' > > RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree - NVIDIA Driver > > 259 kB/s | 76 kB 00:00 > > Failed to download metadata for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver' > > RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree - Updates > >67 kB/s | 76 kB 00:01 > > Failed to download metadata for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates' > > Ignoring repositories: rcm-tools-fedora-rpms, rpmfusion-free-updates, > > rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver, rpmfusion- > > nonfree-updates > > Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:43 ago on Thu 12 Sep 2019 12:06:55 PM > > CEST. > > Error: > > Problem 1: problem with installed package > > python3-packit-0.5.0-1.fc30.noarch > > - python3-packit-0.5.0-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > > repository > > - nothing provides python3.7dist(koji) needed by > > python3-packit-0.5.1-1.fc31.noarch > > packit needs to be rebuilt for python3.8. Sorry, brain fart. This is F31, so we have python3.7. packit-0.6.0-1.fc31 is the latest build, and there's an update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e260b49ac9 But it needs to go to stable. Please file a bug and ask for a freeze exception. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:37:42PM +0200, Martin Kolman wrote: > Looks like I have something uniqe I haven't seen in the other mails, related > to packit: > > $ LANG=en_US sudo dnf --releasever=31 > --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 --enablerepo=updates-testing > distro-sync > RCM Tools for Fedora 31 (RPMs) > 284 B/s | 286 B 00:01 > Failed to download metadata for repo 'rcm-tools-fedora-rpms' > RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Free - Updates > 310 kB/s | 76 kB 00:00 > Failed to download metadata for repo 'rpmfusion-free-updates' > RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree - NVIDIA Driver > 259 kB/s | 76 kB 00:00 > Failed to download metadata for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver' > RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree - Updates > 67 kB/s | 76 kB 00:01 > Failed to download metadata for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates' > Ignoring repositories: rcm-tools-fedora-rpms, rpmfusion-free-updates, > rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver, rpmfusion- > nonfree-updates > Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:43 ago on Thu 12 Sep 2019 12:06:55 PM > CEST. > Error: > Problem 1: problem with installed package python3-packit-0.5.0-1.fc30.noarch > - python3-packit-0.5.0-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - nothing provides python3.7dist(koji) needed by > python3-packit-0.5.1-1.fc31.noarch packit needs to be rebuilt for python3.8. > Problem 2: package python2-pyglet-1.3.2-3.fc29.noarch requires > python2-future, but none of the providers can be > installed > - python2-future-0.17.0-2.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package python2-pyglet-1.3.2-3.fc29.noarch python2-pyglet will be obsoleted. > Problem 3: problem with installed package packit-0.5.0-1.fc30.noarch > - package packit-0.5.1-1.fc31.noarch requires python3-packit = > 0.5.1-1.fc31, but none of the providers can be > installed > - packit-0.5.0-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - nothing provides python3.7dist(koji) needed by > python3-packit-0.5.1-1.fc31.noarch > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) This is the same as Problem 1. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 03:23:43PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > So, aeskulap was orphaned. I don't even see an F31 branch somehow: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/aeskulap/branches?branchname=master > > What should be done here? > > > - dcmtk-3.6.2-4.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > There's certainly a build for F31 for dcmtk. > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1322503 > > I don't see an update for F31 on bodhi, though. Maybe that got skipped? > > > - vtk-8.1.1-5.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > There's vtk 8.2.0-6 that is already in F31 stable. So not sure what this > implies: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-986bbe4d7f This was already resolved elsewhere in the thread: both issues are resolved by obsoleting aeskulap. Latest update to fedora-obsolete-packages does that. > In general what does "does not belong to a distupgrade repository" mean? Dunno. dnf output could use some love here. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
Looks like I have something uniqe I haven't seen in the other mails, related to packit: $ LANG=en_US sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync RCM Tools for Fedora 31 (RPMs) 284 B/s | 286 B 00:01 Failed to download metadata for repo 'rcm-tools-fedora-rpms' RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Free - Updates 310 kB/s | 76 kB 00:00 Failed to download metadata for repo 'rpmfusion-free-updates' RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree - NVIDIA Driver 259 kB/s | 76 kB 00:00 Failed to download metadata for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver' RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree - Updates 67 kB/s | 76 kB 00:01 Failed to download metadata for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates' Ignoring repositories: rcm-tools-fedora-rpms, rpmfusion-free-updates, rpmfusion-nonfree-nvidia-driver, rpmfusion- nonfree-updates Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:43 ago on Thu 12 Sep 2019 12:06:55 PM CEST. Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package python3-packit-0.5.0-1.fc30.noarch - python3-packit-0.5.0-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides python3.7dist(koji) needed by python3-packit-0.5.1-1.fc31.noarch Problem 2: package python2-pyglet-1.3.2-3.fc29.noarch requires python2-future, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-future-0.17.0-2.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-pyglet-1.3.2-3.fc29.noarch Problem 3: problem with installed package packit-0.5.0-1.fc30.noarch - package packit-0.5.1-1.fc31.noarch requires python3-packit = 0.5.1-1.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - packit-0.5.0-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides python3.7dist(koji) needed by python3-packit-0.5.1-1.fc31.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) CCing one of the packit maintainers. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: The third one, python3-parso, has builds for 0.5.1-2.fc30 and 0.5.1-2.fc32, but there is no 0.5.1-2 build for fc31. File a bug please. It's against the guidelines to have a higher-numbered build in F30 compared to F31. Maintainers need to file an update for F31. I filed this one already: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751448___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 10:48:51 -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > Problem 2: package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires > libdcmdata.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires > libdcmimage.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires > libdcmimgle.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires > libdcmjpeg.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires > libdcmnet.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires > libijg12.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires > libijg16.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires > libijg8.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires > liboflog.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires > libofstd.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed So, aeskulap was orphaned. I don't even see an F31 branch somehow: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/aeskulap/branches?branchname=master What should be done here? > - dcmtk-3.6.2-4.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository There's certainly a build for F31 for dcmtk. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1322503 I don't see an update for F31 on bodhi, though. Maybe that got skipped? > - vtk-8.1.1-5.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository There's vtk 8.2.0-6 that is already in F31 stable. So not sure what this implies: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-986bbe4d7f In general what does "does not belong to a distupgrade repository" mean? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 07:12:37AM +0200, Franta Hanzlík wrote: > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:54:45 +0200 > Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > > and try to run [*]: > > > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > ... > > # dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > Adobe Systems Incorporated 5.5 kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00 > Fedora Modular 31 -i38 42 kB/s | 54 kB 00:01 > Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora-modular' > Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora-modular' For some reason (maybe somebody from either infra or the modular camp can provide more info), the metadata for fedora-modular repositories fails to download much more often than regular fedora. Just kick it again. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 07:14:43PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > The third one, python3-parso, has builds for 0.5.1-2.fc30 and > 0.5.1-2.fc32, but there is no 0.5.1-2 build for fc31. File a bug please. It's against the guidelines to have a higher-numbered build in F30 compared to F31. Maintainers need to file an update for F31. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:30:12PM -0400, Jared K. Smith wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 9:01 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > > and try to run [*]: > > > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > > > Error: > Problem 1: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 requires > libIlmImf-2_2.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - OpenEXR-libs-2.2.0-16.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703828 > Problem 2: package python2-pkgwat-0.11-12.fc29.noarch requires > python2-cliff, but none of the providers can be installed > - python2-cliff-2.13.0-2.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package python2-pkgwat-0.11-12.fc29.noarch Added to f-o-p now. > Problem 3: problem with installed package > exa-0.8.0-13.module_f30+4041+ebfd9240.x86_64 > - package exa-0.9.0-2.module_f31+5365+04413d87.x86_64 requires > libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - exa-0.8.0-13.module_f30+4041+ebfd9240.x86_64 does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded > - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded dnf module reset libgit2 Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:42:27PM -0400, Code Zombie wrote: > Hi > > Here's my output (I am running F30): > > Problem 1: problem with installed package eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch > - eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - nothing provides jgit = 5.3.0-5.fc31 needed by > eclipse-jgit-5.3.0-5.fc31.noarch eclipse-jgit ftbfs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735128 > Problem 2: package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 requires > libperl.so.5.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 requires > perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.0), but none of the providers can be installed > - perl-libs-4:5.28.2-439.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 > - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-439.module_f31+6019+b24e098f.x86_64 is > excluded > - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-439.module_f31+6050+a462f342.x86_64 is > excluded > Problem 3: package xfce4-hamster-plugin-1.7-21.fc30.x86_64 requires > hamster-time-tracker, but none of the providers can be installed > - hamster-time-tracker-2.0-0.16.rc1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package xfce4-hamster-plugin-1.7-21.fc30.x86_64 hamster-time-tracker is gone: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hamster-time-tracker/c/02aaa10ecbdc8fa8a39496464f8b3844a6f3de44. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751591 > Problem 4: problem with installed package > gnome-builder-3.32.3-1.fc30.x86_64 > - package gnome-builder-3.34.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires > libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package gnome-builder-3.33.92-1.fc31.x86_64 requires > libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - gnome-builder-3.32.3-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded > - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded > Problem 5: problem with installed package > kf5-ktexteditor-5.59.0-1.fc30.x86_64 > - package kf5-ktexteditor-5.61.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires > libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - kf5-ktexteditor-5.59.0-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded > - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded > Problem 6: problem with installed package > libgit2-glib-0.28.0.1-1.fc30.x86_64 > - package libgit2-glib-0.28.0.1-3.fc31.x86_64 requires > libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - libgit2-glib-0.28.0.1-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded > - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) dnf module reset libgit2 Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [EXT] Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:56:37PM +, Anderson, Charles R wrote: > I know you didn't ask about F29 upgrades, but it looks like it might work: Upgrades from F29 are supported too, so this check is very useful. > Install 135 Packages > Upgrade 2417 Packages > Remove 4 Packages Nice! Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:30:51AM -0500, Ron Olson wrote: > This is what I got: > > Error: > Problem 1: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 requires > libIlmImf-2_2.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed > - OpenEXR-libs-2.2.0-16.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703828 > Problem 2: problem with installed package > exa-0.8.0-13.module_f30+4041+ebfd9240.x86_64 > - package exa-0.9.0-2.module_f31+5365+04413d87.x86_64 requires > libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - exa-0.8.0-13.module_f30+4041+ebfd9240.x86_64 does not belong to > a distupgrade repository > - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is > excluded > - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded dnf module reset libgit2 > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) > > I was going to open tickets, per the request, but I guess I don’t > know what “excluded” means, and whether “not being to a distupgrade > repository” is a temporary thing, or something that really should > have a ticket created. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 05:18:36PM +0100, chedi toueiti wrote: > Error: > Problem 1: problem with installed package > mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64 > - mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - nothing provides mono(ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib) = 1.1.0.0 needed by > mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-15.fc31.x86_64 Hmm, mono-core-5.20.1-1.fc31 provides mono(ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib) = 4.84.0.0, but mono-tools-4.2-15.fc31 was built later. tpokorra, can you take a look? > Problem 2: package kupfer-208-15.fc28.noarch requires python2-keybinder, > but none of the providers can be installed > - python2-keybinder-0.3.1-13.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package kupfer-208-15.fc28.noarch kupfer is gone: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675241. I'll add it to f-o-p. > Problem 3: package mono-debugger-2.10-21.fc30.x86_64 requires > mono(Mono.Cecil) = 0.9.6.0, but none of the providers can be installed > - mono-cecil-0.9.6-12.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package mono-debugger-2.10-21.fc30.x86_64 More mono issues. tpokorra? > Problem 4: package python2-pillow-tk-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 requires > python2-pillow(x86-64) = 5.4.1-2.fc30, but none of the providers can be > installed > - python2-pillow-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package python2-pillow-tk-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751570 > Problem 5: package python2-virtualenv-clone-0.2.6-12.fc29.noarch requires > python2-virtualenv, but none of the providers can be installed > - python2-virtualenv-16.0.0-7.fc30.noarch does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package > python2-virtualenv-clone-0.2.6-12.fc29.noarch Added to f-o-p. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:10:41AM -0400, Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 9/11/19 8:54 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > > and try to run [*]: > > > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > > > If you get this prompt: > > > > ... > > Total download size: XXX M > > Is this ok [y/N]: > > > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > > report it against the appropriate package. Or > > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > > Fedora 31. Please check existing reports first: > > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > > > Thank you > > > > [*] this command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > > potential problems. You may also run `dnf > > upgrade` before running this command. > > > > Below are the three problems that I get. There are already bugs filed > against chirp for python2, but I didn't see any relating to PyQwt or > crypto-utils. Should I create new bugs for them? > > Steve > > Error: > Problem 1: package PyQwt-devel-5.2.0-42.fc30.x86_64 requires PyQwt(x86-64) = > 5.2.0-42.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed > - PyQwt-5.2.0-42.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package PyQwt-devel-5.2.0-42.fc30.x86_64 pyqwt was retired. I'll add it to fedora-obsolete-packages. > Problem 2: package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 requires > libperl.so.5.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 requires > perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.0), but none of the providers can be installed > - perl-libs-4:5.28.2-438.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 crypto-utils was retired. I'll add it to fedora-obsolete-packages. > Problem 3: package chirp-20190812-1.fc31.noarch requires > python2dist(future), but none of the providers can be installed > - problem with installed package chirp-20190812-1.fc30.noarch > - python2-future-0.17.0-2.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - chirp-20190812-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737641 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:51:42PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:48:51AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:16:28PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > > > > time and try to run [*]: > > > > > > > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > > > > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > > > Here's an upgrade run against five systems. There's a few more I can > > test but they're not accessible from here. > > > > System 1: (Laptop) > > > > Error: > > Problem 1: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.23b-6.fc30.x86_64 > > - 0ad-0.0.23b-6.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > - nothing provides libmozjs38-ps-release.so()(64bit) needed by > > 0ad-0.0.23b-8.fc31.x86_64 > > - nothing provides libmozjs38-ps-release.so(js)(64bit) needed by > > 0ad-0.0.23b-8.fc31.x86_64 > > I see kalev is building 0ad right now, so hopefully this will be resolved > soon. > > > Problem 2: package python2-pillow-qt-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 requires > > python2-pillow(x86-64) = 5.4.1-2.fc30, but none of the providers can be > > installed > > - python2-pillow-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > > repository > > - problem with installed package python2-pillow-qt-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 > > So the python2-pillow-qt subpackage was dropped, but not all > python2-pillow subpackages. It'd be best if pillow maintainers either > do the obsoletes internally or file a bug against f-o-p. I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751570 now. > > System 2: (Workstation) > > > > Modular dependency problems: > > > > Problem 1: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module > > eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 > > Problem 2: module jmc:latest:3120190813124555:7188e41a-0.x86_64 requires > > module(eclipse), but none of the providers can be installed > > - conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module > > eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 > > > Problem 2: package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires > > libdcmdata.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > aeskulap is gone. I'll add it to f-o-p. > > > - dcmtk-3.6.2-4.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > This either needs a rebuild or an update. Actually, no. dcmtk should be fixed when aeskulap is obsoleted. > > Problem 3: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 requires > > libIlmImf-2_2.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703828 > > Problem 8: package openshot-2.4.4-2.fc31.noarch requires > > python3-libopenshot >= 0.2.3, but none of the providers can be installed > > - package python3-libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 > > requires libjsoncpp.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > > installed > > - package python3-libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc31.x86_64 > > requires libjsoncpp.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > > installed openshot is from rpmfusion. > > - cannot install both jsoncpp-1.9.1-1.fc31.x86_64 and > > jsoncpp-1.8.4-6.fc30.x86_64 > > - package vtk-8.2.0-6.fc31.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.21()(64bit), but > > none of the providers can be installed > > Looks like this needs another rebuild and an update. Actually, no. vtk should be fixed when jsoncpp is upgraded. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On 9/12/19 9:52 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 11. 09. 19 v 17:14 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): sudo dnf module disable libgit2 standard-test-roles sudo dnf remove rust-libgit2-sys-devel sudo dnf upgrade libgit2 sudo dnf module reset libgit2 is option as well. Thanks this worked. The question is how to handle this generally. https://pagure.io/modularity/issue/151 Perhaps DNF can issue a warning or more information during package upgrades, for example indicating available streams. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:55 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run [*]: > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. My problem listing is so large it will probably account for noise here. It all boils down to the coccinelle package (coccinelle-1.0.7-5.fc30.x86_64 on my machine) generating 8 verbose problems. If you can't reproduce it I will reluctantly dump the whole thing ;) Quick peek shows that it hasn't been rebuilt yet for f31 or rawhide: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/coccinelle So I assume it's only a matter of time until it is rebuilt against f31's OCaml. I also had another package causing a problem, but I removed it from my system: > Problem 2: package python3-html2text-2019.8.11-1.fc31.noarch obsoletes > python2-html2text <= 2019.8.11-1.fc31 provided by > python2-html2text-2018.1.9-2.fc31.noarch > - package rss2email-2.71-14.fc29.noarch requires python2-html2text >= 3.01, > but none of the providers can be installed > - cannot install the best update candidate for package > python2-html2text-2018.1.9-1.fc30.noarch > - python2-html2text-2018.1.9-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package rss2email-2.71-14.fc29.noarch I removed rss2email from my installation, smells like missing py2 obsoletes. Dridi ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
Dne 11. 09. 19 v 17:14 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > sudo dnf module disable libgit2 standard-test-roles > sudo dnf remove rust-libgit2-sys-devel > sudo dnf upgrade libgit2 sudo dnf module reset libgit2 is option as well. The question is how to handle this generally. https://pagure.io/modularity/issue/151 -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:54:45 +0200 Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run [*]: > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > ... # dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync Adobe Systems Incorporated 5.5 kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00 Fedora Modular 31 -i38 42 kB/s | 54 kB 00:01 Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora-modular' Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora-modular' -- Franta Hanzlik ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
Miroslav Suchy wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run [*]: > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync A variant: # dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 --enablerepo=updates-testing --skip-broken --allowerasing -b --assumeno distro-sync Only four problems: Removing dependent packages: coccinelle x86_641.0.7-6.fc30 @System 20 M python2-policycoreutils noarch2.9-4.fc30 @System 1.3 M Downgrading: eclipse-equinox-osgi x86_641:4.11-3.fc31fedora 1.7 M llvm7.0-libs x86_647.0.1-4.fc31.1 fedora 15 M Thanks. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
* on the Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:54:45PM +0200, Miroslav Such? was commenting: | Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run [*]: | | sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync | | If you get this prompt: | | ... | Total download size: XXX M | Is this ok [y/N]: Transaction Summary Install 38 Packages Upgrade2378 Packages Remove8 Packages Downgrade 1 Package Total download size: 2.7 G Is this ok [y/N]: after adding --allowerasing to the commandline. Harish signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 6:55 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run [*]: No errors for me, but 3 downgrades: Downgrading: gap-pkg-edim x86_64 1.3.3-6.fc31fedora78 k gap-pkg-genssnoarch 1.6.5-6.fc31fedora56 k python3-parsonoarch 0.5.1-1.fc31fedora 142 k The first two are mine. I did those builds right about the time that bodhi was enabled for F31. After it was enabled, I tried to create updates for them just in case they hadn't quite made it in, and bodhi told me there were no candidate builds. I just tried again, and bodhi *still* tells me there are no candidate builds. These are the latest actual builds for them: gap-pkg-edim-1.3.5-1.fc31 gap-pkg-genss-1.6.6-1.fc31 How should I fix this? The third one, python3-parso, has builds for 0.5.1-2.fc30 and 0.5.1-2.fc32, but there is no 0.5.1-2 build for fc31. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 11:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:48:51AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:16:28PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > > > > time and try to run [*]: > > > > > > > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > > > > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > > > Here's an upgrade run against five systems. There's a few more I can > > test but they're not accessible from here. > > > > System 1: (Laptop) > > > > Error: > > Problem 1: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.23b-6.fc30.x86_64 > > - 0ad-0.0.23b-6.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > - nothing provides libmozjs38-ps-release.so()(64bit) needed by > > 0ad-0.0.23b-8.fc31.x86_64 > > - nothing provides libmozjs38-ps-release.so(js)(64bit) needed by > > 0ad-0.0.23b-8.fc31.x86_64 > > I see kalev is building 0ad right now, so hopefully this will be resolved > soon. > > > Problem 2: package python2-pillow-qt-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 requires > > python2-pillow(x86-64) = 5.4.1-2.fc30, but none of the providers can be > > installed > > - python2-pillow-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > > repository > > - problem with installed package python2-pillow-qt-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 > > So the python2-pillow-qt subpackage was dropped, but not all > python2-pillow subpackages. It'd be best if pillow maintainers either > do the obsoletes internally or file a bug against f-o-p. > > > > > System 2: (Workstation) > > > > Modular dependency problems: > > > > Problem 1: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module > > eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 > > Problem 2: module jmc:latest:3120190813124555:7188e41a-0.x86_64 requires > > module(eclipse), but none of the providers can be installed > > - conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module > > eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 > > > Problem 2: package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires > > libdcmdata.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > aeskulap is gone. I'll add it to f-o-p. > > > - dcmtk-3.6.2-4.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > This either needs a rebuild or an update. > > > Problem 3: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 requires > > libIlmImf-2_2.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > - OpenEXR-libs-2.2.0-16.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > > repository > > - problem with installed package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 I've opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751416 for gegl04 to obsolete gegl03. > > Problem 4: package obnam-1.21-7.fc29.x86_64 requires python2-cliapp, but > > none of the providers can be installed > > - python2-cliapp-1.20180121-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a > > distupgrade repository > > - problem with installed package obnam-1.21-7.fc29.x86_64 > > Problem 5: package python2-terminado-0.8.1-6.fc29.noarch requires > > python2-tornado >= 4.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed > > - python2-tornado-5.0.2-5.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > > repository > > python2-tornado is already in f-o-p. I'll add > python2-terminado-0.8.1-6.fc29.noarch. > > > - problem with installed package python2-terminado-0.8.1-6.fc29.noarch > > Problem 6: problem with installed package > > libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 > > - package libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc31.x86_64 requires > > libjsoncpp.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > - libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a > > distupgrade repository > > - jsoncpp-1.8.4-6.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > Problem 7: cannot install both jsoncpp-1.9.1-1.fc31.x86_64 and > > jsoncpp-1.8.4-6.fc30.x86_64 > > - package python3-libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc31.x86_64 > > requires libjsoncpp.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > > installed > > - package cmake-3.14.5-4.fc31.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.21()(64bit), > > but none of the providers can be installed > > - problem with installed package > > python3-libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 > > - problem with installed package cmake-3.14.5-1.fc30.x86_64 > > - python3-libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 does not > > belong to a distupgrade repository > > - cmake-3.14.5-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > Problem 8: package openshot-2.4.4-2.fc31.noarch requires > > python3-libopenshot >= 0.2.3, but none of the providers can be installed > > - package python3-libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 > > requires libjsoncpp.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > >
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
I rebase on silverblue, flawless.. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 9:01 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run [*]: > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > Error: Problem 1: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 requires libIlmImf-2_2.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - OpenEXR-libs-2.2.0-16.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 Problem 2: package python2-pkgwat-0.11-12.fc29.noarch requires python2-cliff, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-cliff-2.13.0-2.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-pkgwat-0.11-12.fc29.noarch Problem 3: problem with installed package exa-0.8.0-13.module_f30+4041+ebfd9240.x86_64 - package exa-0.9.0-2.module_f31+5365+04413d87.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - exa-0.8.0-13.module_f30+4041+ebfd9240.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
Hi Here's my output (I am running F30): Problem 1: problem with installed package eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch - eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides jgit = 5.3.0-5.fc31 needed by eclipse-jgit-5.3.0-5.fc31.noarch Problem 2: package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.0), but none of the providers can be installed - perl-libs-4:5.28.2-439.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-439.module_f31+6019+b24e098f.x86_64 is excluded - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-439.module_f31+6050+a462f342.x86_64 is excluded Problem 3: package xfce4-hamster-plugin-1.7-21.fc30.x86_64 requires hamster-time-tracker, but none of the providers can be installed - hamster-time-tracker-2.0-0.16.rc1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package xfce4-hamster-plugin-1.7-21.fc30.x86_64 Problem 4: problem with installed package gnome-builder-3.32.3-1.fc30.x86_64 - package gnome-builder-3.34.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnome-builder-3.33.92-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-builder-3.32.3-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded Problem 5: problem with installed package kf5-ktexteditor-5.59.0-1.fc30.x86_64 - package kf5-ktexteditor-5.61.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - kf5-ktexteditor-5.59.0-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded Problem 6: problem with installed package libgit2-glib-0.28.0.1-1.fc30.x86_64 - package libgit2-glib-0.28.0.1-3.fc31.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libgit2-glib-0.28.0.1-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) Best regards On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:55 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run [*]: > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > report it against the appropriate package. Or > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 31. Please check existing reports first: > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > Thank you > > [*] this command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. You may also run `dnf > upgrade` before running this command. > > -- > Miroslav Suchy, RHCA > Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
Here's the error I run into on my desktop: Error: Problem: problem with installed package eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch - eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides jgit = 5.3.0-5.fc31 needed by eclipse-jgit-5.3.0-5.fc31.noarch Eclipse doesn't appear to be having a good time right now with the transition to 31 from what I see: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/groups/eclipse ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64 - mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides mono(ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib) = 1.1.0.0 needed by mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-15.fc31.x86_64 Problem 2: package kupfer-208-15.fc28.noarch requires python2-keybinder, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-keybinder-0.3.1-13.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package kupfer-208-15.fc28.noarch Problem 3: package mono-debugger-2.10-21.fc30.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.Cecil) = 0.9.6.0, but none of the providers can be installed - mono-cecil-0.9.6-12.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package mono-debugger-2.10-21.fc30.x86_64 Problem 4: package python2-pillow-tk-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 requires python2-pillow(x86-64) = 5.4.1-2.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-pillow-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-pillow-tk-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 Problem 5: package python2-virtualenv-clone-0.2.6-12.fc29.noarch requires python2-virtualenv, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-virtualenv-16.0.0-7.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-virtualenv-clone-0.2.6-12.fc29.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 4:53 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:48:51AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:16:28PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > > > > time and try to run [*]: > > > > > > > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > > > > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > > > Here's an upgrade run against five systems. There's a few more I can > > test but they're not accessible from here. > > > > System 1: (Laptop) > > > > Error: > > Problem 1: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.23b-6.fc30.x86_64 > > - 0ad-0.0.23b-6.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > - nothing provides libmozjs38-ps-release.so()(64bit) needed by > 0ad-0.0.23b-8.fc31.x86_64 > > - nothing provides libmozjs38-ps-release.so(js)(64bit) needed by > 0ad-0.0.23b-8.fc31.x86_64 > > I see kalev is building 0ad right now, so hopefully this will be resolved > soon. > > > Problem 2: package python2-pillow-qt-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 requires > python2-pillow(x86-64) = 5.4.1-2.fc30, but none of the providers can be > installed > > - python2-pillow-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > > - problem with installed package python2-pillow-qt-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 > > So the python2-pillow-qt subpackage was dropped, but not all > python2-pillow subpackages. It'd be best if pillow maintainers either > do the obsoletes internally or file a bug against f-o-p. > > > > > System 2: (Workstation) > > > > Modular dependency problems: > > > > Problem 1: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module > eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 > > Problem 2: module jmc:latest:3120190813124555:7188e41a-0.x86_64 > requires module(eclipse), but none of the providers can be installed > > - conflicting requests > > - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module > eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 > > > Problem 2: package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires > libdcmdata.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > aeskulap is gone. I'll add it to f-o-p. > > > - dcmtk-3.6.2-4.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > This either needs a rebuild or an update. > > > Problem 3: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 requires > libIlmImf-2_2.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > - OpenEXR-libs-2.2.0-16.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > > - problem with installed package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 > > Problem 4: package obnam-1.21-7.fc29.x86_64 requires python2-cliapp, > but none of the providers can be installed > > - python2-cliapp-1.20180121-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > > - problem with installed package obnam-1.21-7.fc29.x86_64 > > Problem 5: package python2-terminado-0.8.1-6.fc29.noarch requires > python2-tornado >= 4.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed > > - python2-tornado-5.0.2-5.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > > python2-tornado is already in f-o-p. I'll add > python2-terminado-0.8.1-6.fc29.noarch. > > > - problem with installed package python2-terminado-0.8.1-6.fc29.noarch > > Problem 6: problem with installed package > libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 > > -
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:48:51AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:16:28PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > > > time and try to run [*]: > > > > > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > > > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > Here's an upgrade run against five systems. There's a few more I can > test but they're not accessible from here. > > System 1: (Laptop) > > Error: > Problem 1: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.23b-6.fc30.x86_64 > - 0ad-0.0.23b-6.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - nothing provides libmozjs38-ps-release.so()(64bit) needed by > 0ad-0.0.23b-8.fc31.x86_64 > - nothing provides libmozjs38-ps-release.so(js)(64bit) needed by > 0ad-0.0.23b-8.fc31.x86_64 I see kalev is building 0ad right now, so hopefully this will be resolved soon. > Problem 2: package python2-pillow-qt-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 requires > python2-pillow(x86-64) = 5.4.1-2.fc30, but none of the providers can be > installed > - python2-pillow-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package python2-pillow-qt-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 So the python2-pillow-qt subpackage was dropped, but not all python2-pillow subpackages. It'd be best if pillow maintainers either do the obsoletes internally or file a bug against f-o-p. > > System 2: (Workstation) > > Modular dependency problems: > > Problem 1: conflicting requests > - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module > eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 > Problem 2: module jmc:latest:3120190813124555:7188e41a-0.x86_64 requires > module(eclipse), but none of the providers can be installed > - conflicting requests > - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module > eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 > Problem 2: package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires > libdcmdata.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed aeskulap is gone. I'll add it to f-o-p. > - dcmtk-3.6.2-4.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository This either needs a rebuild or an update. > Problem 3: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 requires > libIlmImf-2_2.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - OpenEXR-libs-2.2.0-16.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 > Problem 4: package obnam-1.21-7.fc29.x86_64 requires python2-cliapp, but > none of the providers can be installed > - python2-cliapp-1.20180121-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package obnam-1.21-7.fc29.x86_64 > Problem 5: package python2-terminado-0.8.1-6.fc29.noarch requires > python2-tornado >= 4.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed > - python2-tornado-5.0.2-5.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository python2-tornado is already in f-o-p. I'll add python2-terminado-0.8.1-6.fc29.noarch. > - problem with installed package python2-terminado-0.8.1-6.fc29.noarch > Problem 6: problem with installed package > libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 > - package libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc31.x86_64 requires > libjsoncpp.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - jsoncpp-1.8.4-6.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > Problem 7: cannot install both jsoncpp-1.9.1-1.fc31.x86_64 and > jsoncpp-1.8.4-6.fc30.x86_64 > - package python3-libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc31.x86_64 > requires libjsoncpp.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package cmake-3.14.5-4.fc31.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.21()(64bit), > but none of the providers can be installed > - problem with installed package > python3-libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 > - problem with installed package cmake-3.14.5-1.fc30.x86_64 > - python3-libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 does not > belong to a distupgrade repository > - cmake-3.14.5-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > Problem 8: package openshot-2.4.4-2.fc31.noarch requires python3-libopenshot > >= 0.2.3, but none of the providers can be installed > - package python3-libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 > requires libjsoncpp.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package python3-libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc31.x86_64 > requires libjsoncpp.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - cannot install both jsoncpp-1.9.1-1.fc31.x86_64 and > jsoncpp-1.8.4-6.fc30.x86_64 > - package vtk-8.2.0-6.fc31.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.21()(64bit), but > none of the
Re: [EXT] Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On 2019-09-11, Anderson, Charles R wrote: > No dep failures, but downgrades: > > Downgrading: [...] > perl-Date-Manip noarch 6.77-2.fc31 >fedora1.0 M > The maintainer forgot to submit perl-Date-Manip-6.78-1.fc31 build into testing. I did it now. -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run [*]: > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > If you get this prompt: On ppc64le power8 Fedora 30 server(?) image on PowerVM 2.1.1. install with dev Install25 Packages Upgrade 1135 Packages Total download size: 627 M Is this ok [y/N]: Looks good so far. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 04:55:05PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote: > A few errors reported when testing on KDE (one ticket for problem 4 > at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751242): > > Error: > Problem 1: package plasma-discover-snap-5.15.5-1.fc30.x86_64 > requires plasma-discover = 5.15.5-1.fc30, but none of the providers > can be installed > - plasma-discover-5.15.5-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package > plasma-discover-snap-5.15.5-1.fc30.x86_64 > Problem 2: package python2-pyglet-1.3.2-3.fc29.noarch requires > python2-future, but none of the providers can be installed > - python2-future-0.17.0-2.fc30.noarch does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package python2-pyglet-1.3.2-3.fc29.noarch python2-future is obsoleted by f-o-p. python2-pyglet must be too. I'll add it to f-o-p. > Problem 3: problem with installed package > kf5-ktexteditor-5.59.0-1.fc30.x86_64 > - package kf5-ktexteditor-5.61.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires > libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - kf5-ktexteditor-5.59.0-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded > - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded There is some magic incantation needed to reset dnf's knowledge of the module, so non-modular libgit2 is installed: I did: sudo dnf module disable libgit2 standard-test-roles sudo dnf remove rust-libgit2-sys-devel sudo dnf upgrade libgit2 This seems to work, but if you have other packages like rust-libgit2-sys-devel, you might need to remove them also. Maybe there's some better incantation. > Problem 4: problem with installed package > langpacks-zh_CN-1.0-17.fc30.noarch > - package langpacks-zh_CN-2.0-6.fc31.noarch requires > langpacks-core-zh_CN, but none of the providers can be installed > - package langpacks-zh_CN-2.0-5.fc31.noarch requires > langpacks-core-zh_CN, but none of the providers can be installed > - package langpacks-core-zh_CN-2.0-6.fc31.noarch requires > (ibus-libpynyin if xorg-x11-server-Xorg), but none of the providers > can be installed This looks like a typo: we have ibus-libpinyin-1.11.1-2.fc31.x86_64. The fix will be in langpacks-core-zh_CN. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:48:51AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > System 2: (Workstation) Adding in --allowerasing allows the upgrade to proceed: Removing dependent packages: 0ad x86_64 0.0.23b-6.fc30 @fedora 16 M aeskulap x86_64 0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30 @fedora 1.6 M gegl03 x86_64 0.3.30-5.fc30@fedora 6.3 M libopenshot x86_64 0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30 @rpmfusion-free 1.3 M obnamx86_64 1.21-7.fc29 @fedora 1.7 M openshot noarch 2.4.4-2.fc30 @rpmfusion-free-updates 80 M openshot-langnoarch 2.4.4-2.fc30 @rpmfusion-free-updates 19 M python2-terminadonoarch 0.8.1-6.fc29 @updates 94 k python3-libopenshot x86_64 0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30 @rpmfusion-free 2.4 M Transaction Summary Install 67 Packages Upgrade4489 Packages Remove 14 Packages Downgrade10 Packages Total download size: 6.7 G Openshot isn't Fedora's problem, but the rest are. There are a couple of F29 stragglers left behind from the last upgrade too. Not sure what I should file tickets about here.. > System 5: (Fedora 29 server) Adding in --allowerasing allows the upgrade to proceed: Removing dependent packages: crypto-utils x86_64 2.5-4.fc29 @fedora 203 k dokuwiki-selinux noarch 20180422b-1.fc29@updates112 mailgraph noarch 1.14-34.fc29@fedora 65 k obnam x86_64 1.21-7.fc29 @fedora 1.7 M python2-acme noarch 0.37.2-1.fc29 @updates678 k python2-certbot noarch 0.37.2-1.fc29 @updates2.7 M python2-parsedatetime noarch 2.4-9.fc29 @fedora 351 k python2-pillow-tk x86_64 5.3.0-1.fc29@fedora 50 k python2-pysaml2 noarch 4.5.0-4.fc29@fedora 4.0 M system-config-rootpassword noarch 1.99.6-18.fc29 @fedora 172 k Transaction Summary Install 187 Packages Upgrade3649 Packages Remove 16 Packages Downgrade12 Packages Total download size: 2.2 G - Solomon -- Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org High Springs, FL ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^ Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [EXT] Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
I know you didn't ask about F29 upgrades, but it looks like it might work: Removing: kernelx86_64 5.2.7-100.fc29 @updates-testing0 kernel-core x86_64 5.2.7-100.fc29 @updates-testing 66 M kernel-modulesx86_64 5.2.7-100.fc29 @updates-testing 28 M kernel-modules-extra x86_64 5.2.7-100.fc29 @updates-testing 2.1 M Enabling module streams: gimp 2.10 Transaction Summary = Install 135 Packages Upgrade 2417 Packages Remove 4 Packages Total download size: 3.0 G Is this ok [y/N]: n Operation aborted. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [EXT] Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
No dep failures, but downgrades: Downgrading: gimp x86_64 2:2.10.12-2.module_f31+5293+eb7fed42 fedora-modular 22 M gimp-libs x86_64 2:2.10.12-2.module_f31+5293+eb7fed42 fedora-modular2.2 M podmanx86_64 2:1.5.1-2.17.dev.gitce64c14.fc31 updates-testing11 M podman-manpages noarch 2:1.5.1-2.17.dev.gitce64c14.fc31 updates-testing 205 k perl-Date-Manip noarch 6.77-2.fc31 fedora1.0 M Transaction Summary = Install 51 Packages Upgrade2123 Packages Remove3 Packages Downgrade 5 Packages Total download size: 2.4 G Is this ok [y/N]: n Operation aborted. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:16:28PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > > time and try to run [*]: > > > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync Here's an upgrade run against five systems. There's a few more I can test but they're not accessible from here. System 1: (Laptop) Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.23b-6.fc30.x86_64 - 0ad-0.0.23b-6.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides libmozjs38-ps-release.so()(64bit) needed by 0ad-0.0.23b-8.fc31.x86_64 - nothing provides libmozjs38-ps-release.so(js)(64bit) needed by 0ad-0.0.23b-8.fc31.x86_64 Problem 2: package python2-pillow-qt-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 requires python2-pillow(x86-64) = 5.4.1-2.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-pillow-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-pillow-qt-5.4.1-2.fc30.x86_64 System 2: (Workstation) Modular dependency problems: Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 Problem 2: module jmc:latest:3120190813124555:7188e41a-0.x86_64 requires module(eclipse), but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.23b-6.fc30.x86_64 - 0ad-0.0.23b-6.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides libmozjs38-ps-release.so()(64bit) needed by 0ad-0.0.23b-8.fc31.x86_64 - nothing provides libmozjs38-ps-release.so(js)(64bit) needed by 0ad-0.0.23b-8.fc31.x86_64 Problem 2: package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires libdcmdata.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires libdcmimage.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires libdcmimgle.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires libdcmjpeg.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires libdcmnet.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires libijg12.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires libijg16.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires libijg8.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires liboflog.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires libofstd.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - dcmtk-3.6.2-4.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 Problem 3: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 requires libIlmImf-2_2.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - OpenEXR-libs-2.2.0-16.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 Problem 4: package obnam-1.21-7.fc29.x86_64 requires python2-cliapp, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-cliapp-1.20180121-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package obnam-1.21-7.fc29.x86_64 Problem 5: package python2-terminado-0.8.1-6.fc29.noarch requires python2-tornado >= 4.0.0, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-tornado-5.0.2-5.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-terminado-0.8.1-6.fc29.noarch Problem 6: problem with installed package libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 - package libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc31.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - jsoncpp-1.8.4-6.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 7: cannot install both jsoncpp-1.9.1-1.fc31.x86_64 and jsoncpp-1.8.4-6.fc30.x86_64 - package python3-libopenshot-0.2.3-2.20190406git101f25a.fc31.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package cmake-3.14.5-4.fc31.x86_64 requires libjsoncpp.so.21()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
W dniu 11.09.2019 o 14:54, Miroslav Suchý pisze: > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run [*]: > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync Had to remove 'openshot' (FTBFS in rpmfusion) and then upgrade went fine. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
My attempt revealed these errors Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.module_f30+5264+0fe54b96.noarch - eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.module_f30+5264+0fe54b96.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides jgit = 5.3.0-5.fc31 needed by eclipse-jgit-5.3.0-5.fc31.noarch Problem 2: package kate-plugins-19.08.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libKF5TextEditor.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package kate-plugins-19.04.2-1.fc30.x86_64 - package kf5-ktexteditor-5.61.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - kf5-ktexteditor-5.59.0-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - kate-plugins-19.04.2-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) On 11. 9. 2019 14:54, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run [*]: sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 31. Please check existing reports first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu Thank you [*] this command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. -- Marián Konček ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 08:33:24AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > Not sure where this one should go but looks like there's a problem with > policycoreutils-python... > > Problem 5: problem with installed package unifi-5.10.25-1.fc30.x86_64 > - package unifi-5.10.25-2.fc31.x86_64 requires policycoreutils-python, > but none of the providers can be installed > - unifi-5.10.25-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - python2-policycoreutils-2.9-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a > distupgrade repository $ rpm -q --obsoletes fedora-obsolete-packages|grep policycore python2-policycoreutils < 2.9-2 So the package is gone and obsoleted in F31. unifi would have to stop depending on it. There is no Fedora bug here. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
This is what I got: Error: Problem 1: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 requires libIlmImf-2_2.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - OpenEXR-libs-2.2.0-16.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 Problem 2: problem with installed package exa-0.8.0-13.module_f30+4041+ebfd9240.x86_64 - package exa-0.9.0-2.module_f31+5365+04413d87.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - exa-0.8.0-13.module_f30+4041+ebfd9240.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) I was going to open tickets, per the request, but I guess I don’t know what “excluded” means, and whether “not being to a distupgrade repository” is a temporary thing, or something that really should have a ticket created. Ron On 11 Sep 2019, at 7:54, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run [*]: sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 31. Please check existing reports first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu Thank you [*] this command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 14:54 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > time and try to run [*]: > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual > upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, > please report it against the appropriate package. Or > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 31. Please check existing reports first: > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > Thank you > > [*] this command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will > reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf > upgrade` before running this command. > > -- > Miroslav Suchy, RHCA > Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Hi, Summary... The 4 for removal are just f30 kernel packages. Transaction Summary === = Install20 Packages Upgrade 1619 Packages Remove 4 Packages Total download size: 1.6 G Is this ok [y/N]: Regards Phil -- *** Playing the game for the games sake. *** IRC: kathenas Twitter: kathenasorg Website: https://kathenas.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On 9/11/19 8:54 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run [*]: > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > report it against the appropriate package. Or > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora > 31. Please check existing reports first: > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > Thank you > > [*] this command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. You may also run `dnf > upgrade` before running this command. > Below are the three problems that I get. There are already bugs filed against chirp for python2, but I didn't see any relating to PyQwt or crypto-utils. Should I create new bugs for them? Steve Error: Problem 1: package PyQwt-devel-5.2.0-42.fc30.x86_64 requires PyQwt(x86-64) = 5.2.0-42.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed - PyQwt-5.2.0-42.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package PyQwt-devel-5.2.0-42.fc30.x86_64 Problem 2: package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.0), but none of the providers can be installed - perl-libs-4:5.28.2-438.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 Problem 3: package chirp-20190812-1.fc31.noarch requires python2dist(future), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package chirp-20190812-1.fc30.noarch - python2-future-0.17.0-2.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - chirp-20190812-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
A few errors reported when testing on KDE (one ticket for problem 4 at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751242): Error: Problem 1: package plasma-discover-snap-5.15.5-1.fc30.x86_64 requires plasma-discover = 5.15.5-1.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed - plasma-discover-5.15.5-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package plasma-discover-snap-5.15.5-1.fc30.x86_64 Problem 2: package python2-pyglet-1.3.2-3.fc29.noarch requires python2-future, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-future-0.17.0-2.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-pyglet-1.3.2-3.fc29.noarch Problem 3: problem with installed package kf5-ktexteditor-5.59.0-1.fc30.x86_64 - package kf5-ktexteditor-5.61.0-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - kf5-ktexteditor-5.59.0-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded Problem 4: problem with installed package langpacks-zh_CN-1.0-17.fc30.noarch - package langpacks-zh_CN-2.0-6.fc31.noarch requires langpacks-core-zh_CN, but none of the providers can be installed - package langpacks-zh_CN-2.0-5.fc31.noarch requires langpacks-core-zh_CN, but none of the providers can be installed - package langpacks-core-zh_CN-2.0-6.fc31.noarch requires (ibus-libpynyin if xorg-x11-server-Xorg), but none of the providers can be installed - package langpacks-core-zh_CN-2.0-5.fc31.noarch requires (ibus-libpynyin if xorg-x11-server-Xorg), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.20.5-4.fc30.x86_64 - xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.20.5-4.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - langpacks-zh_CN-1.0-17.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) On 9/11/19 3:54 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run [*]: sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 31. Please check existing reports first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu Thank you [*] this command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
I separated the policycoreutils one since it seemed more dire but here's my full output (with some RPM Fusion specific stuff filtered out): Modular dependency problems: Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 Problem 2: module jmc:latest:3120190813124555:7188e41a-0.x86_64 requires module(eclipse), but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64 Error: Problem 1: package python2-simplemediawiki-1.2.0-0.16.b2.fc29.noarch requires python2-sphinx, but none of the providers can be installed - python2-sphinx-1:1.8.4-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-simplemediawiki-1.2.0-0.16.b2.fc29.noarch Problem 2: problem with installed package libgit2-glib-0.28.0.1-1.fc30.x86_64 - package libgit2-glib-0.28.0.1-3.fc31.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libgit2-glib-0.28.0.1-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded Problem 4: package chirp-20190812-1.fc31.noarch requires python2dist(future), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package chirp-20190812-1.fc30.noarch - python2-future-0.17.0-2.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - chirp-20190812-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository Known issue... Not that I want to do it this way, but could building chirp as a module with just the python 2 packages it needs work? Problem 5: problem with installed package unifi-5.10.25-1.fc30.x86_64 - package unifi-5.10.25-2.fc31.x86_64 requires policycoreutils-python, but none of the providers can be installed - unifi-5.10.25-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - python2-policycoreutils-2.9-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
RE: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
-Original message- > From:Miroslav Suchý > Sent: Wednesday 11th September 2019 12:55 > To: Development discussions related to Fedora > Subject: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31 > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run [*]: > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. No issues on my laptop with F30 Workstation + Dev and multimedia stuff (from rpmfusion): Transaction Summary == Install25 Packages Upgrade 1972 Packages Remove 4 Packages Total download size: 2.6 G Is this ok [y/N]: Looking forward to F31. Thank you all for your great work! Best, Patrick ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
Not sure where this one should go but looks like there's a problem with policycoreutils-python... Problem 5: problem with installed package unifi-5.10.25-1.fc30.x86_64 - package unifi-5.10.25-2.fc31.x86_64 requires policycoreutils-python, but none of the providers can be installed - unifi-5.10.25-1.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - python2-policycoreutils-2.9-1.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository While the project is in RPM Fusion the error seems to be in the policycoreutils package itself. I tried building the latest version to see if just a simple rebuild would fix it but it doesn't: INFO: installing package(s): unifi-5.11.39-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm unifi-data-5.11.39-1.fc32.noarch.rpm No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk fedora 30 kB/s | 13 kB 00:00 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides /usr/bin/mongod needed by unifi-5.11.39-1.fc32.x86_64 - nothing provides policycoreutils-python needed by unifi-5.11.39-1.fc32.x86_64 ERROR: Command failed: # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 32 --setopt=deltarpm=False --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk install unifi-5.11.39-1.fc32.x86_64.rpm unifi-data-5.11.39-1.fc32.noarch.rpm I'm not worried about the mongodb problem since Ijust install the upstream CentOS package... Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: EXTERNAL: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
On 9/11/19 8:55 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run [*]: > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > report it against the appropriate package. Or > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora > 31. Please check existing reports first: > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > Thank you > > [*] this command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. You may also run `dnf > upgrade` before running this command. > FWIW: Transaction Summary == Install52 Packages Upgrade 2384 Packages Remove 4 Packages Total download size: 2.8 G Is this ok [y/N]: -- Roger Wells, P.E. leidos 221 Third St Newport, RI 02840 401-847-4210 (voice) 401-849-1585 (fax) roger.k.we...@leidos.com ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
Error: Problem: problem with installed package bat-0.10.0-1.module_f30+4037+f98ba4b0.x86_64 - package bat-0.11.0-3.module_f31+5338+1c55392b.x86_64 requires libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - bat-0.10.0-1.module_f30+4037+f98ba4b0.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package libgit2-0.28.2-2.module_f31+5411+fa1856a4.x86_64 is excluded - package libgit2-0.28.2-3.fc31.x86_64 is excluded Actually, I was about to ask what must I do to update bat on Fedora 30, because for the past few weeks I have not been able to do so on a couple of systems, but I haven't had the time to dig deeper. Installed Packages Name : bat Version : 0.10.0 Release : 1.module_f30+4037+f98ba4b0 Architecture : x86_64 Size : 3.4 M Source : rust-bat-0.10.0-1.module_f30+4037+f98ba4b0.src.rpm Repository : @System From repo: updates-modular Summary : cat(1) clone with wings URL : https://crates.io/crates/bat License : MIT or ASL 2.0 Description : cat(1) clone with wings. Available Packages Name : bat Version : 0.11.0 Release : 3.module_f30+5045+5668d494 Architecture : x86_64 Size : 1.6 M Source : rust-bat-0.11.0-3.module_f30+5045+5668d494.src.rpm Repository : updates-modular Summary : cat(1) clone with wings URL : https://crates.io/crates/bat License : MIT or ASL 2.0 Description : Cat(1) clone with wings. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run [*]: sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 31. Please check existing reports first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu Thank you [*] this command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
