Hi,
On Sat, 2021-02-20 at 10:49 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run:
>
># Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
># next time you run any DNF command default modules will be
> enabled again
>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 08:17:20AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 07:06:47PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:08:56PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > yum distro-sync --releasever 34
> > > Last metadata expiration
Another dot on the map:
Issues:
- rdma-core (known problem)
- jami (third party repo, does not have f34 yet)
- mpd (requires libupnp.so.16, but there seems to be only libupnp.so.17
in f34 available)
Error:
Problem 1: package jami-daemon-20210219.1.9530a07-1.fc33.x86_64 requires
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 07:06:47PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:08:56PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > yum distro-sync --releasever 34
> > Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:11 ago on Wed 24 Feb 2021 11:55:46 AM
> > CST.
> > Error:
> > Problem:
On 2/20/21 10:49 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> sudo dnf --releasever=34 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f34 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \
> distro-sync
Problem: package gnome-tour-40~beta-3.fc34.x86_64 obsoletes
gnome-getting-started-docs
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 12:08:56PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> yum distro-sync --releasever 34
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:11 ago on Wed 24 Feb 2021 11:55:46 AM
> CST.
> Error:
> Problem: package gnome-tour-40~beta-3.fc34.x86_64 obsoletes
> gnome-getting-started-docs < 3.38.1-2
yum distro-sync --releasever 34
Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:11 ago on Wed 24 Feb 2021 11:55:46 AM CST.
Error:
Problem: package gnome-tour-40~beta-3.fc34.x86_64 obsoletes
gnome-getting-started-docs < 3.38.1-2 provided by
gnome-getting-started-docs-3.38.0-2.fc34.noarch
- package
I tried here on a F33 kde spin (on bare metal Acer/intel notebook) and it
worked fine, just as expected:
Instalar48 Pacotes
Atualizar 2019 Pacotes
Remover 5 Pacotes
Desatualizar 2 Pacotes
Tamanho total do download: 1.8 G
regards
Geraldo
FAS: geraldosimiao
Em sáb., 20
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 09:27:45AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 23. 02. 21 v 1:15 Nathanael D. Noblet napsal(a):
> >Error:
> > Problem: package empathy-1:3.12.14-7.fc29.x86_64 requires
> >libfolks.so.25()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > -
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 11:36:45AM -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> > sudo dnf module reset '*'
> >
> > sudo dnf --releasever=34 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f34 \
> > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \
> > distro-sync
>
> F32 x86_64 server:
>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:41:01AM +, Sven Kieske wrote:
> Error:
> Problem: package gnome-tour-40~beta-3.fc34.x86_64 obsoletes
> gnome-getting-started-docs < 3.38.1-2 provided by
> gnome-getting-started-docs-3.38.0-2.fc34.noarch
> - package gnome-initial-setup-40~beta-1.fc34.x86_64
Dne 22. 02. 21 v 23:52 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
Error: Unknown repo: 'updates-testing-modular'
That's not an error really. You don't have 'fedora-repos-modular'
package installed, so this repository is not available. Miroslav's
command simply assumes that you have modules enabled.
Dne 23. 02. 21 v 1:15 Nathanael D. Noblet napsal(a):
Error:
Problem: package empathy-1:3.12.14-7.fc29.x86_64 requires
libfolks.so.25()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- folks-1:0.14.0-5.fc33.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- problem with installed
Dne 22. 02. 21 v 16:47 Marián Konček napsal(a):
Error:
Problem 2: rdma-core-33.0-2.fc33.i686 has inferior architecture
- rdma-core-33.0-2.fc33.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package rdma-core-33.0-2.fc33.i686
If you have have
On Sat, 2021-02-20 at 10:49 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled
> again
>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:24:41AM +, Carlos "casep" Sepulveda wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 at 18:56, Micah Shennum wrote:
> >
> > Not sure if it's something weird with my system, but running that exact
> > command I get
> >
> > Error: Unknown repo: 'updates-testing-modular'
That's not an
> sudo dnf module reset '*'
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=34 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f34 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \
> distro-sync
F32 x86_64 server:
Error:
Problem 1: package python3-blindspin-2.0.1-9.fc32.noarch requires
Error:
Problem 1: package openmw-0.46.0-2.fc33.x86_64 requires
libboost_filesystem.so.1.73.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
- boost-filesystem-1.73.0-9.fc33.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package
On Mo, 2021-02-22 at 10:20 +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> You probably have an outdated repository definition in /etc/yum.repos.d.
>
> Your /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-cisco-openh264.repo should have following
> line:
>
>
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 at 18:56, Micah Shennum wrote:
>
> Not sure if it's something weird with my system, but running that exact
> command I get
>
> Error: Unknown repo: 'updates-testing-modular'
>
> Dropping the reference to updates-testing-modular gets me a couple of removed
> packages
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:37:26AM +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Problem 2: problem with installed package perf-5.10.11-200.fc33.x86_64
> - package perf-5.11.0-0.rc7.git0.1.fc34.x86_64 requires
> libopencsd_c_api.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> -
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 10:49:12 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:10:27AM +, Sven Kieske wrote:
> On Sa, 2021-02-20 at 10:49 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> > and try to run:
> >
> ># Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> ># next time
On Sa, 2021-02-20 at 10:49 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
># Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
># next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
>sudo
Not sure if it's something weird with my system, but running that exact
command I get
Error: Unknown repo: 'updates-testing-modular'
Dropping the reference to updates-testing-modular gets me a couple of
removed packages (obviously the kernel modules are not an issue, but I
don't know what the
Error:
Problem 1: libnghttp2-1.41.0-3.fc33.i686 has inferior architecture
- libnghttp2-1.41.0-3.fc33.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package libnghttp2-1.41.0-3.fc33.i686
Problem 2: rdma-core-33.0-2.fc33.i686 has inferior architecture
-
On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 at 09:49, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run:
>
># Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
># next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled
> again
>sudo dnf
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 08:32:34PM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Saturday, February 20, 2021 12:13:05 PM WET Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > Looks OK. It is allowed for packages to be downgraded, if that's
> > what you meant as a bug.
> >
> > Zbyszek
>
> No the bug was that it
On Saturday, February 20, 2021 12:13:05 PM WET Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> Looks OK. It is allowed for packages to be downgraded, if that's
> what you meant as a bug.
>
> Zbyszek
No the bug was that it worked. :-)
Since there were no failures that went against my expectation and thus
❯ sudo dnf --releasever=34 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f34 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \
distro-sync --allowerasing
All fine, but few packages wants to downgrade:
conmon
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 02:57:19PM +0100, chedi toueiti wrote:
> Error:
> Problem: package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires
> libr_anal.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> - package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires
> libr_asm.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none
Error:
Problem: package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires
libr_anal.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package cutter-re-1.11.0-3.fc34.x86_64 requires
libr_asm.so.4.5.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- package
On 20/2/21 09:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 08:45:58AM -0300, Pablo Sebastián Greco wrote:
On 20/2/21 06:49, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
sudo dnf --releasever=34 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f34 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 08:45:58AM -0300, Pablo Sebastián Greco wrote:
> On 20/2/21 06:49, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > sudo dnf --releasever=34 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f34 \
> > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \
> > distro-sync
> >
> Can we add
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 10:05:53AM +, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Saturday, February 20, 2021 9:49:12 AM WET Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > If you get this prompt:
> >
> >...
> >Total download size: XXX M
> >Is this ok [y/N]:
> >
> > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to
Apart from the rdma-core.i686 issue, just four package downgrades:
- abrt-java-connector - from 1.2.0-5.fc33 to 1.2.0-2.fc34
- clang9.0-libs - from 9.0.1-9.fc33 to 9.0.1-5.fc32
- fuse-overlayfs - from 1.4.0-1.fc33 to 1.4+dev-2.dev.gitee8ce2e.fc34
- gnome-abrt - from 1.3.6-5.fc33 to 1.3.6-2.fc34
On 20/2/21 06:49, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled
again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 11:19 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 20. 02. 21 10:49, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> > and try
> > to run:
> >
> ># Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> ># next time you run any DNF
On 20. 02. 21 10:49, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try
to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
On Saturday, February 20, 2021 9:49:12 AM WET Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> If you get this prompt:
>
>...
>Total download size: XXX M
>Is this ok [y/N]:
>
> you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade.
Oops, I got this.
...
Transaction Summary
Do you want to make Fedora 34 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
sudo dnf --releasever=34
41 matches
Mail list logo
