On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 11:15 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:27 +, Barry Scott wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 21/02/2024 07:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> > > --enablerepo=updates-testing
On Thu, 2024-03-07 at 10:27 +, Barry Scott wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On 21/02/2024 07:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> >
> > dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> > --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --
> >
On 21/02/2024 07:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync
Fedora KDE spin - Intel CPU AMD GPU -
I'm getting:
Problem 1: package libzypp-17.31.8-2.fc39.x86_64 requires
libboost_thread.so.1.81.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- cannot install both boost-thread-1.81.0-8.fc39.x86_64 and
boost-thread-1.83.0-3.fc40.x86_64
- cannot install the best update candidate for
Hi,
Here's my contribution to this: error upgrading `flang-devel`
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2267221
On 2024/02/21 8:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora
Dne 25. 02. 24 v 18:02 Ralf Corsépius napsal(a):
Am 24.02.24 um 10:12 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
On 2/24/24 00:47, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Am 24.02.24 um 01:36 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
On 2/23/24 15:38, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Am 23.02.24 um
On 2/25/24 09:02, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
My actual problem seems to be not being able to get rid of the
"installed groups".
"dnf group remove " apparently uninstalls all packages from this
.
This is not what I want. I want to remove the comps-groups from my
system, because of the harmful
Am 24.02.24 um 10:12 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
On 2/24/24 00:47, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Am 24.02.24 um 01:36 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
On 2/23/24 15:38, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Am 23.02.24 um 22:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf
On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 09:47 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.02.24 um 01:36 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
> > On 2/23/24 15:38, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Am 23.02.24 um 22:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
> > > > > On
Miroslav Suchý kirjoitti 21.2.2024 klo 9.11:
dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync
In addition to some problems that already
Dominique Martinet kirjoitti 21.2.2024 klo 15.13:
Miroslav Suchý wrote on Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:11:49AM +0100:
dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular)
On 2/24/24 01:12, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2/24/24 00:47, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- package libva-intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.i686 from fedora
conflicts with intel-media-driver provided by
intel-media-driver-24.1.3-1.fc40.x86_64 from rpmfusion-nonfree
On 2/24/24 00:47, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Am 24.02.24 um 01:36 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
On 2/23/24 15:38, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Am 23.02.24 um 22:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
# dnf system-upgrade download
Am 24.02.24 um 01:36 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
On 2/23/24 15:38, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Am 23.02.24 um 22:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
# dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40
...
No match for group
On 2/23/24 15:38, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Am 23.02.24 um 22:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
# dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40
...
No match for group package "multican"
...
WTH?
It was a
On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 00:06 +0100, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
>
> Am 23.02.24 um 22:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
> > On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> > >
> > > # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40
> > > ...
> > > No match for group package "multican"
> > > ...
> > >
> > > WTH?
> >
>
Am 23.02.24 um 22:37 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
# dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40
...
No match for group package "multican"
...
WTH?
It was a program for controlling Canon cameras that has been retired.
Some group you have installed has that
On 2/23/24 10:50, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
# dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40
...
No match for group package "multican"
...
WTH?
It was a program for controlling Canon cameras that has been retired.
Some group you have installed has that package listed in it. The comps
groups need
# dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=40
...
No match for group package "multican"
...
WTH?
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi!
On Wednesday, 21 February 2024 at 08:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run:
[...]
> In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the
> appropriate package.
I did run `dnf system-upgrade` and it
*This are the repos enabled here:*
id do repo nome do repo
fedora Fedora 39 - x86_64
fedora-cisco-openh264 Fedora 39 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64
google-chrome-beta google-chrome-beta
rpmfusion-free
No issues here on my primary driver (with updates-testing enabled,
though), but did see some packages being downgraded:
Downgrading:
bind-libs x86_64 32:9.18.21-4.fc40
fedora 1.2 M
bind-license noarch 32:9.18.21-4.fc40
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 12:41 AM Garry T. Williams
wrote:
> Problem 3: package network-scripts-ppp-2.5.0-3.fc39.x86_64 from @System
> requires network-scripts, but none of the providers can be installed
> - network-scripts-10.20-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a
> distupgrade
I get the following output:
--
sudo dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null &&
echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
bash: --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular: command
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 12:11 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
>
>
> dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
>
No errors
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 7:12 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
No problems experienced on my primary desktop.
Thanks!
--
___
devel mailing list --
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:11:49AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
From the Fedora systems I have immediate access to:
Well-used F39 Workstation:
Problem: problem with installed package
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 6:47 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 12:11 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>
>>
>> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
>> try to run:
>>
>> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
>> # next time
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, at 12:11 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> # This is
On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 08:11 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null &&
On Wednesday, February 21, 2024 2:11:49 AM EST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package
telegram-desktop-4.14.15-1.fc39.x86_64
- telegram-desktop-4.14.15-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System does not
belong to a distupgrade repository
- nothing provides qt6-qtbase(x86-64) = 6.6.1 needed by
telegram-desktop-4.14.15-1.fc40.x86_64 from
Le 21/02/2024 à 08:11, Miroslav Suchý a écrit :
> sudo dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync
Erreur :
Problème 1: problème
Miroslav Suchý wrote on Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:11:49AM +0100:
> dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
Error:
Problem
What is missing?
> Other then some missing RPMFusion packages
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 1:28 PM hhlp wrote:
> Error:
>
> Problem: problem with installed package
> gnome-shell-extension-pop-shell-1.2.0^21.aafc945-1.fc39.noarch
> - package gnome-shell-extension-pop-shell-1.2.0^21.aafc945-3.fc40.noarch
> from fedora requires (gnome-shell >= 45~ with
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 12:07 PM hhlp wrote:
> al good as always good work only add --allowerasing in my case
>
Please don't add --allowerasing when doing this test because it hides the
issues that we are interested in.
--
Kalev
--
___
devel mailing
al good as always good work only add --allowerasing in my case
Installing weak dependencies:
boost-numpy3 x86_64 1.83.0-3.fc40 fedora 30 k
cups-filters-driverless x86_64 1:2.0.0-6.fc40 fedora 29 k
gnome-software-fedora-langpacks x86_64 46~beta-1.fc40 fedora
I just found that my visidata issue is likely being handled via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264975
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265038
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/285
--
___
devel
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:24 ago on Wed Feb 21 10:16:20 2024.
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package visidata-2.11.1-2.fc39.noarch
- visidata-2.11.1-2.fc39.noarch from @System does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- nothing provides /usr/bin/-S needed by
Other then some missing RPMFusion packages
Den ons 21 feb. 2024 kl 09:13 skrev Luna Jernberg :
>
> Worked good on my Thinkpad Edge laptop some weeks ago
>
> Den ons 21 feb. 2024 kl 08:12 skrev Miroslav Suchý :
> >
> > Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> >
Worked good on my Thinkpad Edge laptop some weeks ago
Den ons 21 feb. 2024 kl 08:12 skrev Miroslav Suchý :
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command
Do you want to make Fedora 40 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
# This is last time we should do that :)
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf
43 matches
Mail list logo
