PS:
I wrote:
> The patch still applies cleanly to current git master. I'm going to attach
> it to Trac.
https://trac.fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5854
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 12.02.2014 20:46, schrieb Josh Boyer:
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 12.02.2014 20:26, schrieb Peter Oliver:
On 10 February 2014 16:42, Till Maas wrote:
> Isn't AutoQA already runnin
Am 12.02.2014 20:46, schrieb Josh Boyer:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 12.02.2014 20:26, schrieb Peter Oliver:
>>> On 10 February 2014 16:42, Till Maas wrote:
>>>
Isn't AutoQA already running these kind of checks?
>>>
>>> Here's an example:
>>> https://admi
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 12.02.2014 20:26, schrieb Peter Oliver:
>> On 10 February 2014 16:42, Till Maas wrote:
>>
>>> Isn't AutoQA already running these kind of checks?
>>
>> Here's an example:
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-1847/Atomic
Am 12.02.2014 20:26, schrieb Peter Oliver:
> On 10 February 2014 16:42, Till Maas wrote:
>
>> Isn't AutoQA already running these kind of checks?
>
> Here's an example:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-1847/AtomicParsley-0.9.5-2.fc20
worthless as long "results are informati
On 10 February 2014 16:42, Till Maas wrote:
> Isn't AutoQA already running these kind of checks?
Here's an example:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-1847/AtomicParsley-0.9.5-2.fc20
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
On 10.02.2014 17:11, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 13:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've just upgraded my main workstation form F-20 to rawhide, and during
>> the distro-sync I noticed that several packages in rawhide are older then
>> in F-20.
>>
>> Although there
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Can you attach a current version of that to a releng trac ticket and
> mark it 'meeting' so it gets discussed at the next releng meeting?
>
> That would be great.
The patch still applies cleanly to current git master. I'm going to attach
it to Trac.
>> I wrote, which Jesse
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 19:27 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > However, IMHO it makes more
> > sense to just hook into AutoQA instead of running the same test
> > twice. Also it would allow to respond in a timely manner which might
> > better help to educate maintainers instead of when there are severa
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:04:04 +0100
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > This is the one I have run in the past:
> > https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/check-upgrade-paths.py
>
> If you're going to use that script, PLEASE use this patch:
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject
I think some packagers don't follow Fedora too often, so for a while
we can't avoid this issue. But fedpkg should have a RFE:
1. fedpkg checks if the branch is able to receive commits as normal,
then return status of the branch.
But here comes a problem, Fedora allows packagers to commit to the E
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 21:37:19 +0100
Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:55:26AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:42:47 +0100
> > Till Maas wrote:
>
> > > Isn't AutoQA already running these kind of checks?
> >
> > For f19 and f20 updates, yes... in an advisory manne
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> This is the one I have run in the past:
> https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/check-upgrade-paths.py
If you're going to use that script, PLEASE use this patch:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20120418/ead924dd/attachment.bin
I wr
Hi,
On 02/10/2014 08:03 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>>
>> Would folks be ok with running it weekly or something?
>>
>> and on which path? The entire f19-updates-testing to rawhide?
>>
>
> IMO, yes and yes
+1
Thanks & Regards,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:55:26AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:42:47 +0100
> Till Maas wrote:
> > Isn't AutoQA already running these kind of checks?
>
> For f19 and f20 updates, yes... in an advisory manner.
>
> But not for rawhide since it has no bodhi update to add the
Hi
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Would folks be ok with running it weekly or something?
>
> and on which path? The entire f19-updates-testing to rawhide?
>
IMO, yes and yes
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:42:47 +0100
Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:36:33AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > This is the one I have run in the past:
> > https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/check-upgrade-paths.py
> >
> > Would folks be ok with running it weekly or
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 09:36:33AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> This is the one I have run in the past:
> https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/check-upgrade-paths.py
>
> Would folks be ok with running it weekly or something?
>
> and on which path? The entire f19-updates-testing
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:46:20 +0200
Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Hans de Goede
> wrote:
> > 2) Can someone maybe write a script which automatically detects
> > this situation and files bugs with a description text aimed at not
> > only getting the issue fixed, but also e
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 13:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've just upgraded my main workstation form F-20 to rawhide, and during
>> the distro-sync I noticed that several packages in rawhide are older then
>> in F-20.
>
> That
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 13:14 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just upgraded my main workstation form F-20 to rawhide, and during
> the distro-sync I noticed that several packages in rawhide are older then
> in F-20.
>
> Although there will be some exceptions I believe that for most o
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> 2) Can someone maybe write a script which automatically detects
> this situation and files bugs with a description text aimed at not
> only getting the issue fixed, but also educating the packager?
I wrote a script to detect this and ran it
Hi all,
I've just upgraded my main workstation form F-20 to rawhide, and during
the distro-sync I noticed that several packages in rawhide are older then
in F-20.
Although there will be some exceptions I believe that for most of them this
is caused by some packages still not having a proper workf
23 matches
Mail list logo
