On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 07:55:08PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > I would much prefer to generate the git log from the rpm changelog than
> > vice-versa, though. THe git log is going to contain more entries than the
> > rpm changelog as little things get fixed from time t
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 13:11 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> In principle, the system for extracting %changelog from git might work,
> with two provisos:
>
> - people understand that git changelogs have slightly different purpose
> than RPM changelogs: git records 'what' changed, while RPM shou
On 09/24/2010 01:32 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> The rpm changelog should be more like NEWS than a changelog; and usually
> a summary of NEWS, at that. (imho, no packaging guidelines currently
> mandate this, etc.)
I could swear I had written "don't copy the upstream changelog into the
rpm change
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I would much prefer to generate the git log from the rpm changelog than
> vice-versa, though. THe git log is going to contain more entries than the
> rpm changelog as little things get fixed from time to time that deserve a
> commit in git but don't deserve a mention in th
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 05:43:47PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> > Is it really necessary to in
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 17:43:47 +0100,
Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> For the fact that its gone from version X to version Y yes. For the
> actual application changed between version X and version Y they can
> see the ChangeLog that's in the %doc or alternatively check the
> release notes for the n
On 09/24/2010 12:43 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Is it really necessary to include entire package c
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > Is it really necessary to include entire package change logs in the
>> > rpm changelog? What is wron
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Is it really necessary to include entire package change logs in the
> > rpm changelog? What is wrong with referencing either the included
> > changelog or a URL
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Is it really necessary to include entire package change logs in the
> rpm changelog? What is wrong with referencing either the included
> changelog or a URL to a changelog that people can go and reference. I
> remember this being dis
> anjuta-2.31.90.0-1.fc14
> ---
> * Sun Aug 22 2010 Debarshi Ray - 1:2.31.90.0-1
> - Version bump to 2.31.90.0.
> * Initial support for Python plugins.
> * Language support for Vala got a major update.
> * Python is now fully supported.
> * Snippets plugin from Google Summe
11 matches
Mail list logo
