On 3 October 2011 08:57, Richard Hughes wrote:
> That's what it was supposed to be, but due to an oversight on my part
> the wrong keys were being set. I've fixed this upstream in
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660395 -- which will of
> course be included in 3.2.1
I've done a test b
Le Lun 3 octobre 2011 17:09, Przemek Klosowski a écrit :
> The bottom line is that the power supply is probably on the fritz and
> likely to fail altogether. Decent power supplies aren't that expensive,
> I recently got a nice, quiet one for around $30-40.
Thanks, but it's perfectly fine under l
On 10/03/2011 05:37 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> 3. uses a high efficiency low-noise PSU, which does not like power ups
> at all (in fact restarting the computer now takes a dozen tries, with
> minutes waiting for caps to drain ; yes I could change the hardware but
> it works fine under load and a
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
>> 2) The machine has a server function. In this case working wake on lan and
>> stay active on lan are a must have and until we have those it should not
>> auto suspend.
>
> WOL for a network server is madness. It shouldn't have been s
> > As you can see, suspending is the right thing to do.
>
> 1) Not for servers
> 2) This is todays hardware and with every generation the gap is getting
> smaller
> between dyn pm savings and suspend savings.
It looks like it also might not be for systems that have encrypted swap.
I think I sta
Hi,
To provide another data point, here my desktop :
1. runs network services (because webmail just works locally and remotely,
unlike evo which has been a crasher for as long as I can remember)
2. uses dyndns (evil I know) and with the systemd/networkmanager changes
ddclient does not seem to
On 10/03/2011 03:48 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> This is todays hardware and with every generation the gap is getting smaller
> between dyn pm savings and suspend savings.
"The annual life cycle energy use for a computer (3-year lifespan) is
2600 MJ [...]. The energy footprint of a computer is thus
On 1 October 2011 12:02, Hans de Goede wrote:
> I would like to suggest to change the default power policy to never suspend
> while on AC power.
That's what it was supposed to be, but due to an oversight on my part
the wrong keys were being set. I've fixed this upstream in
https://bugzilla.gnome.
Hi,
On 10/02/2011 10:13 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 02:02, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Imagine I'm running a screen session with my irc client in there on my
>> Fedora box,
>
> There has perhaps never been a better sentence written demonstrating
> why software engineers are
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 02:02, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Imagine I'm running a screen session with my irc client in there on my Fedora
> box,
There has perhaps never been a better sentence written demonstrating
why software engineers are not the target audience of any software
development. :-)
> an
Hi,
On 10/01/2011 05:07 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> The subject more or less says it all. When I startup my desktop machine
>> (which thus
>> is always on AC), and leave it at the gdm screen it will suspend after being
>> left
>> alone fo
Hans de Goede wrote:
> The subject more or less says it all. When I startup my desktop machine
> (which thus is always on AC), and leave it at the gdm screen it will
> suspend after being left alone for 30 minutes. This is not good, since I
> only leave it powered on when I intend to access it remo
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:33:13 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> but the "suspend does not work on desktop" argument is simply not true
Not replying to metoo/flames but neither suspend nor hibernate worked reliably
for me through years on notebook (T60). Depending on BIOS and kernel versions
the former or lat
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> The subject more or less says it all. When I startup my desktop machine
> (which thus
> is always on AC), and leave it at the gdm screen it will suspend after being
> left
> alone for 30 minutes. This is not good, since I only leave it power
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> And I can honestly say I've never seen a
> desktop machine where suspend worked with Linux, so suspending desktop
> machines by default seems like a bad idea.
I don't get where this is coming from, suspend has pretty much always
worked on my
Hi All,
The subject more or less says it all. When I startup my desktop machine (which
thus
is always on AC), and leave it at the gdm screen it will suspend after being
left
alone for 30 minutes. This is not good, since I only leave it powered on when I
intend to access it remotely.
I would lik
16 matches
Mail list logo