- Original Message -
I thought I recall reading a plan about kde moving to lightdm at one
point?
Perhaps you could mention the reasons SSDM was decided over lightdm-qt?
Not up to date comparison -
http://aseigo.blogspot.cz/2013/03/logging-into-plasma-workspaces-2.html
Martin knows
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:26:14 +0200, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
BTW, I have some more multi-seat hardware to give away to folks who want
to add true automatic multi-seat to stuff like display managers.
It's a USB box that will give you an VGA/DVI port + audio, plus
To add to this article, there are some bits in the Documentation part of
the change proposal.
Some information is already obsolete though because of fast pace of
development of SDDM.
To conclude, the main reasons are the CLA which is a participation blocker
for many people and better outlook
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 22:00:58 +0200, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
Fine, but can we please have this done *soon*? Ideally, the packages
could already have been created in Rawhide long ago, and this would be a
swap. But please at least have it in place for Alpha TC1. It's a pain
On Mon, 15.07.13 13:17, Martin Briza (mbr...@redhat.com) wrote:
BTW, I have some more multi-seat hardware to give away to folks who want
to add true automatic multi-seat to stuff like display managers.
It's a USB box that will give you an VGA/DVI port + audio, plus
connectors for kbd/mouse.
On Monday 15 July 2013 13:34:58 Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 15.07.13 13:17, Martin Briza (mbr...@redhat.com) wrote:
BTW, I have some more multi-seat hardware to give away to folks who want
to add true automatic multi-seat to stuff like display managers.
It's a USB box that will
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 18:32:51 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemà m...@marcdeop.com
wrote:
On Monday 15 July 2013 13:34:58 Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm, any chance you can connect me with somebody from the KDE community
who might need such a device and would do something nice with it?
Somebody who
I opened a package review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984700 now. The DM works, yet
there are still some issues (incomplete PAM support, you'll be able to log
in but with no sound for example) which I'm working with the upstream on
fixing.
I'm expecting to include
= Proposed Self Contained Change: SDDM as the default KDE display manager
instead of KDM =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM
Change owner(s): Martin Briza mbr...@redhat.com and KDE SIG
Retire KDM as the default display manager of the KDE Fedora Spin in favor of
SDDM.
Hi,
Due to some concerns that were raised regarding further KDM inclusion, I'm
adding this information to the change description:
KDM will still be included in the repositories of Fedora, the change
affects only new installations of Fedora 20, which will have SDDM enabled
as the default
On Thu, 11.07.13 12:34, Martin Briza (mbr...@redhat.com) wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: SDDM as the default KDE display manager
instead of KDM =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM
Change owner(s): Martin Briza mbr...@redhat.com and KDE SIG
BTW, I have some
On 07/10/2013 01:03 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Compared to the current DM, KDM, it currently lacks a few features (such as
XDMCP) but adds some other ones (QtQuick themes) or is currently adding them
(Keyboard layout switching in the greeter).
Is XDMCP on the roadmap? It's a pretty darn
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 20:03 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: SDDM as the default KDE display manager
instead of KDM =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM
Change owner(s): Martin Briza mbr...@redhat.com and KDE SIG
Retire KDM as the
I thought I recall reading a plan about kde moving to lightdm at one
point?
Perhaps you could mention the reasons SSDM was decided over lightdm-qt?
This might be of area to other spins that use lightdm currently and
might wish to look at SSDM too.
Thanks,
kevin
signature.asc
Description:
14 matches
Mail list logo
