On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:41:38PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:04:12PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >>
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:04:12PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > It is possible that udevd is failing for whatever
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 03:04:12PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > It is possible that udevd is failing for whatever reason... but apart
> > from the fact that some of the devices links are missing you
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 27.07.16 21:35, Gilboa Davara (gilb...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I need help trying to debug a weird bug that I'm hitting.
>> I've got a server with fairly large storage (>100TB) that needs to
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> It is possible that udevd is failing for whatever reason... but apart
> from the fact that some of the devices links are missing you don't
> provide any info. At the minimum: boot logs, and information
On Wed, 27.07.16 21:35, Gilboa Davara (gilb...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I need help trying to debug a weird bug that I'm hitting.
> I've got a server with fairly large storage (>100TB) that needs to
> handle very-small-files.
> Due to performance considerations I decided to split the
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 09:35:22PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I need help trying to debug a weird bug that I'm hitting.
> I've got a server with fairly large storage (>100TB) that needs to
> handle very-small-files.
> Due to performance considerations I decided to split the
Hello all,
I need help trying to debug a weird bug that I'm hitting.
I've got a server with fairly large storage (>100TB) that needs to
handle very-small-files.
Due to performance considerations I decided to split the large array
into 128 ext4 partitions (rather than use a single xfs partition).